Translate this page into:
A Comparative Study on Effect of Ambulation and Birthing Ball on Maternal and Newborn Outcome Among Primigravida Mothers in Selected Hospitals in Mangalore
Address for correspondence: Sabitha Nayak, Nitte Usha Institute of Nursing Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, India
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
The study was conducted to assess the effect of ambulation and birthing ball on the maternal and newborn outcome from 01.08.2011 to 31.10.2011. This randomized control study was conducted on 60 primigravida mothers. Purposive sampling technique was used for the selection of samples followed by random allocation of 20 samples each to the three groups namely, ambulation, birthing ball and control group respectively using lottery method. Ambulation and birthing ball therapy were given to the respective samples between cervical dilatation of 1–3cm during first stage of labour, whereas the control group was not given any intervention. Here maternal outcome includes1st stage duration (Area1), 2nd stage duration (Area2), cervical dilatation rate (Area3), and type of delivery(Area4) and newborn outcome includes heart rate, respiratory rate, colour, reflex and muscle tone. Since the t calculated value in Area 1 (5.257), Area 2 (2.781), Area 3(5.438) is greater than t table value (2.042) and in Area 4, 75 % of ambulation group underwent normal vaginal delivery, it shows that there is significant improvement in maternal outcome after the use of ambulation. The t calculated value in Area 1(7.223), Area 2 (5.556), Area 3(6.178) is greater than t table value (2.030) and in Area 4, 95 % of birthing ball group underwent normal vaginal delivery. It shows that there is significant improvement in maternal outcome after the use of birthing ball therapy. Comparison of ambulation and birthing ball therapy on maternal outcome showed that, there is significant difference in second stage duration (t tab 2.031(df=36)< t cal 2.231= S) and type of delivery. In this study ambulation and birthing ball were found to be effective to improve maternal outcome and there was no harm to the baby. Both the experimental group mothers expressed that they were satisfied and comfortable.
Keywords
Ambulation
Birthing ball
Maternal outcome
Newborn outcome
Introduction
Pregnancy is a unique, exciting and often joyous time in a woman's life, as it highlights the amazing creative and nurturing powers while providing a bridge to the future. Pregnancy and birth are tremendously powerful stages of development that bring a woman to motherhood, a couple, to family and a beautiful child into the world. Labour process may be viewed as a test of womanhood, a test of personal competence, a peak of experience, and the first act of motherhood. Labour process starts with the onset of regular uterine activity associated with effacement and dilatation of the cervix and descent of the presenting part through the cervix(1).
Discomfort is one of the biggest obstacles of labour and delivery. Pregnant women don't want to experience the fierce labour that has been in store for them. So they demand for healthier labour, with less discomfort. Women in the developing countries with meagre health facilities usually lie in bed during the first stage of labour. Lying on the back (supine) puts the weight of the pregnant uterus on abdominal blood vessels and contractions may be less strong than when upright. Effective contractions help cervical dilatation and the descent of the baby(1).
Being upright will make contractions stronger and more efficient. It will allow gravity to keep the baby's head pressed down, which will help the cervix to dilate faster so that labour is speeded up.(2) Birthing ball helps the mother to be in an upright position and also it opens pelvis, encouraging baby to move down. Changing positions during labour can change the shape and size of the pelvis, which can help the baby's head move to the optimal position during first stage labour, and helps the baby with rotation and descent during the second stage. Swaying motions such as walking, climbing stairs, and swaying back and forth are especially helpful with this.(3)
In the first stage of labour, the cervix will dilate to 10 cms in diameter. In mothers having their first child, this stage usually lasts 12 to 16 hours. Discomfort can often be helped by body positions that allow gravity to speed dilation, such as walking, squatting, kneeling forward on a chair or sitting on the birthing ball. This will help the baby move down in the pelvis faster and less painfully.(4)
A pilot study conducted at two Canadian hospitals where women in labour were randomly assigned to a regular labour room or to an “ambient room.” In the ambient room, the standard hospital labour bed was removed, and additional equipment was added to promote relaxation, mobility, and a calm atmosphere. The evaluations from women assigned to the ambient room were positive; they spent 50 % or less time labouring in bed and reduced the need for artificial oxytocic infusions.(5)
Birthing ball helps to shorten the first stage of labour. As one sits on the ball, they should move the hips in a circular motion. This allows the baby's head to press against the cervix, which promotes dilation.(6)
A randomised and quasi-randomised trial review was conducted to determine the effect of encouraging women to assume different upright positions (including walking, sitting, standing and kneeling) versus recumbent positions (supine, semi-recumbent and lateral) in the first stage of labour on 3706 women. Result of this review revealed that the first stage of labour was approximately one hour shorter for women randomised to upright as opposed to recumbent positions (MD -0.99, 95 % CI -1.60 to -0.39). Women randomised to upright positions were less likely to have epidural analgesia (RR 0.83 95 % CI 0.72 to 0.96). Walking and upright positions in the first stage of labour reduce the length of labour and do not have any negative effects on mothers and babies wellbeing.(7)
Research evidences have shown that ambulation and birthing ball tend to reduce the duration of first stage of labour. Thus the investigator felt the need to utilise this finding in her setting so as to reduce discomfort and duration during the first stage of labour.
Methods
The study design adopted was a randomized control trial approach with post test control group design. Population comprised of primigravida mothers in the first stage of labour in selected hospitals at Mangalore. Purposive sampling technique was used for selection of samples 60 samples, and random allocation of the samples using lottery method, was done to assign 20 samples to the ambulation, birthing ball and control groups.
Ambulation and birthing ball therapy were given to the respective samples in ambulation and birthing ball group in between cervical dilatation 1–3 cms, whereas the control group was not given any intervention. Then maternal and newborn outcome was analysed by cervicograph, and Apgar score respectively. Here maternal outcome includes^ stage duration (Area1), 2nd stage duration (Area2), cervical dilatation rate (Area3), and type of delivery (Area4) and newborn outcome includes heart rate, respiratory rate, colour, reflex and muscle tone. Data obtained in these areas were analysed by independent t-test expect in Area 4 which was analysed by frequency percentage.
Results
Main findings are discussed under the following headings
1. EFFECT OF AMBULATION ON MATERNAL OUTCOME
Since the t calculated value in Area 1 (5.257), Area 2 (2.781), Area 3 (5.438) is greater than t table value (2.042) at 0.05 level of significance (p<0.05) (Table 1) and in Area 4, 75 % of ambulation group underwent normal vaginal delivery (Table 2), it shows that there is significant improvement in maternal outcome after the use of ambulation.
| Groups | n | mean | t-value | SD | df | LOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Area 1: 1st stage duration) | ||||||
| Ambulation | 18 | 531 | 5.257 | 108.10950 | 32 | 0.000 |
| group | P<0.05 | |||||
| Control group | 16 | 763 | 148.18591 | HS | ||
| (Area 2: 2nd stage duration) | ||||||
| Ambulation | 18 | 32.7222 | 2.781 | 15.32321 | 32 | 0.009 |
| group | P<0.05 | |||||
| Control group | 16 | 49.9375 | 16.58300 | HS | ||
| Area 3: cervical dilation rate) | ||||||
| Ambulation | 18 | 0.0196 | 5.438 | 0.003712 | 32 | 0.000 |
| group | P<0.05 | |||||
| Control group | 16 | 0.0135 | 0.002683 | HS | ||
ttab(32)=2.042
HS= Highly significant
| Ambulation group | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of delivery | Frequency | Percentage | Frequency |
| Normal vaginal delivery | 15 | 75 % | 13 |
| LSCS | |||
| Instrumental delivery | 2 | 10% | 4 |
| 3 | 15% | 3 | |
2. EFFECT OF BIRTHING BALL ON MATERNAL OUTCOME
The t calculated value in Area 1(7.223), Area 2 (5.556), Area 3(6.178) is greater than t table value (2.030) at 0.05 level of significance (p<0.05)(Table 3) and in Area4, 95 % of birthing ball group underwent normal vaginal delivery(Table 4). It shows that there is significant improvement in maternal outcome after the use of birthing ball therapy.
| Groups | n | mean | t-value | SD | df | LOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Area 1: 1st stage duration) | ||||||
| Birthing ball group | 20 | 471 | 92.97849 | 0.000 | ||
| (Area 2: 2nd stage duration) | ||||||
| Birthing ball group | 20 | 23.9000 | 8.40363 | 0.000 | ||
| 5.556 | 34 | P<0.05 | ||||
| Control group | 16 | 49.8125 | 18.67697 | HS | ||
| Area 3: cervical dilation rate) | ||||||
| Birthing ball group | 20 | 0.02230 | 6.178 | 0.005048 | 34 | 0.000 |
| Control group | P<0.05 | |||||
| HS | ||||||
| 16 | 0.01363 | 0.002729 | ||||
ttab(34)=2.030
HS= Highly significant
| Ambulation group | Control group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of delivery | Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | |
| Normal vaginal delivery | 19 | 95 % | 13 | |
| LSCS | ||||
| Instrumental delivery | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1 | 5% | 3 | ||
3. COMPARING THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE OF AMBULATION AND BIRTHING BALL ON MATERNAL OUTCOME
Comparison of ambulation and birthing ball therapy on maternal outcome showed that, there is significant difference in second stage duration (t tab(36)< t cal = S), (Table 5) and type of delivery(Table 6) whereas no significant difference in first stage duration (t tab(32)> t cal = NS) and cervical dilatation rate (t taba(36)> t cal = NS).
| Groups | n | mean | t-value | SD | df | LOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ambulation | 18 | 32.7222 | 2.231 | 15.32321 | 36 | .032 |
| group | P<0.05 | |||||
| Birthing ball group | 20 | 23.9000 | 8.40363 | S |
ttab(36)=2.030
S= Significant
| Ambulation group | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of delivery | Frequency | Percentage | Frequency |
| Normal vaginal delivery | 19 | 75 % | 19 |
| LSCS | 2 | 10 % | 0 |
| Instrumental delivery | 3 | 15 % | 1 |
There were no significant improvement found on newborn outcome after the use of ambulation and birthing ball therapy and also no significant association was found between maternal and newborn outcome and the selected demographic variables.
4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTICIPANTS OPINION ON THE USEFULNESS OF AMBULATION AND BIRTHING BALL THERAPY
In ambulation group, 100 % mothers were comfortable while walking whereas in birthing ball group only 95 % were comfortable.
95 % mothers were satisfied with ambulation and birthing ball respectively.
85 % of mothers from ambulation group and 95 % of mothers from birthing ball group, would like to recommend its use to others.
With regard to family support 65 % from ambulation group & 55 % from birthing ball group felt the need of family members.
Discussion
The effect of ambulation was supported by the findings in a similar study which was conducted in which two hundred mothers were randomly assigned to one of two groups: first group (100 parturients) authorized to ambulate and second group (100 parturients) confined to bed in dorsal or lateral recumbence. The results of the study showed that ambulation reduces (for about 34 %) the duration of the first stage of labour significantly (P<0.0001).(7)
In another study conducted in two hundred and twenty-one women with uncomplicated pregnancies, were randomly divided into two groups, ambulatory and nonambulatory. The result of the study showed that there was significant difference in labour duration (2.89+/+1.83hr vs. 3.94+/-2.17hr ; P=0.001).This study concluded that walking shortens the labour duration.(9)
The effect of birthing ball was supported by the findings in a study which was conducted on effects of birth ball exercise on pain and self-efficacy during childbirth. Results revealed that birth ball exercises provided statistically significant improvements in childbirth self-efficacy and pain. And also mothers in the experimental group had shorter first-stage labour duration, less epidural analgesia, and fewer caesarean deliveries than the control group.(10)
In another study conducted on effect of birthing ball in reduction of labour pain among primigravida mothers it was noticed that birthing ball had an effect on reducing the duration of labour even though it was not statistically proved. No adverse effect on maternal or fetal wellbeing was observed as evidenced by normal FHR and maternal physiological responses like increased rate of cervical dilatation and reduction in the duration of labour.(11)
Conclusions
Labour being the end of the long expectation of pregnancy, marks the beginning of the extrauterine life of the new born. To mark a good beginning, the process and experience of labour should not be a misery for the mother There are a variety of discomforts that a woman will experience during labour. Reducing these discomforts is an important part of good nursing care. Non- pharmacologic methods like walking and birthing ball helps to decrease these discomforts as it reduces the duration of labour.
References
- Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. In: The Cochrane Collaboration. Wiley & Sons Ltd; Published Online: April 15, 2009 (cited 2010 Oct 11)
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- The Labour Progress Handbook by Penny Simkin and Ruth Ancheta. (cited 2011 Jan 3)
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- The Stages of Labor. What to expect during childbirth. (cited 2011 Feb 4) (There was no authors name found in the website and it was only an article sited)
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Healthy Birth Practice: Walk, Move Around, and Change Positions Throughout Labour. Lamaz international 2009 July (cited 2011Oct12) Available from:
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Role of deambulation during labour. In: Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction. Vol 39. 2010. p. :656-62. (2010Oct3).(cited 2010Nov17)
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Ambulatory epidural anesthesia and the duration of labour. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Franc. 2003;80((2)):117-22. (cited 2010Sep11)
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- Effects of birth ball exercise on pain and self-efficacy during childbirth: A randomised controlled trial in Taiwan. Midwifery 2011 Apri1 (2010Nov8)
- [Publisher] [Google Scholar]
- A study on effect of birthing ball in reduction of labour pain among primigravida mothers. In: PG dissertation. Mangalore: Nitte University; 2011.
- [Google Scholar]
