Translate this page into:
A STUDY OF FOOTPRINTS OF TREE-CLIMBING COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH INDIA
Correspondence: Arunachalam Kumar, Professor, Department of Anatomy K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, India. E-mail: directorrd@nitte.edu.in.
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
The paper details the morphological adaptations of the foot shape and its arches to sustained professional tree climbing activity. Foot inversion, as required by climbers on a long term and regular basis reshapes the bony architecture of the foot and the medial longitudinal arch over a period of time. These changes can be observed and measured, noninvasively through study of footprints.
This community study on the progressive adaptation of the arch to the rigors of climbing was recorded through footprints collected from the climbers with varied experience in the profession. The collation of observations show that the medial arch continues to shrink with sustained inversion, raising the dome of the instep.
The progressive compensatory rise in arch height however, is arrested abruptly after a phase, with failure of the arch to accommodate further to more stress – leading to slipping and falls from heights. The article discusses the bio-mechanisms and kinetics of foot adaptation to the rigors of climbers and analysis the cause of accidental falls, even though most of the accidental fall victims have had a number of years of climbing experience.
Keywords
medial longitudinal arch
foot
coconut palm
community
inversion
Introduction :
The human foot, though designed to bear weight and facilitate bipedal locomotion also shows the combined effects of heredity and acquired lifestyle. Adaptation in shape and modifications in soft tissue and osteological components of the foot to large extent are dictated by kinetic stresses and strains it is subject to. Functional biomechanics play a visually verifiable and metrically quantifiable anatomical remodeling of foot structure.
The role of foot arches in aiding the early of biped to adapt to a terrestrial existenceis a landmark milestone in development of the hominid. The ligaments, joints, bones, muscles and soft tissue components of the foot, contribute in their own unique ways in making man, the only one among his mammalian cousins, to have mastered the art of walking on hind limbs as units1. The question raised here is, are these time honored evolutionary anatomical features of the foot absolute?2 Can prolonged and sustained strain induced by specific usages such as in tree climbing, influence the foot structure to revert to its simian prototype? Are these changes, if any, measurable?3
The footprint is a unique record of the weight bearing status. The print impress itself is a metrically assessable permanent database. Evaluation of the hemi-dome (hollowness) produced by the medial edge of the human foot, essentially the measurements of the components of the medial longitudinal arch4 should present us with data which can be compared and analyzed. In this paper we present our findings on the evaluation of both feet of a hundred adult males from local communities that practice tree-climbing. The results are compared with those collated from measurements in lay population of males
Material & Methods
Footprints of both feet were recorded on graph sheets, using ink pads as staining medium (Fig. 1 & 2) Adult males from Thiyya, Idiga, Billava and Namdhari communities of three contiguous districts of the southwest coast of India formed the nidus for this study. The horizontal length, breadth and surface area of the hollow semilunar space in the prints were measured using Meyer's line as reference. The height of the medial arch was measured as a perpendicular drawn from the tuberosity of the navicular to the horizontal (Fig. 3). The study was conducted across communities spread across three contiguous south India states (Tamilnadu, Kerala and Karnataka)
Tabulations and graphical records for visually identifiable gross changes and adaptations were prepared. The control group consisted of adult males drawn at random from similar age range. Field observations of the plantation industry, of palmyrah (toddy), areca and coconut were made to note the techniques of tree climbing used by professionals. The results were subject to statistical analysis and evaluation. None of the volunteers for this project was subject to any hospital-based investigation or invasive procedure. Visual observations on external features of feet in professionals were also made.
Results & Observations
The metrical values of both feet in tree climbers of varied ages and years of experience in occupation, along with the values of the control group are shown in Tables I to IV. The measurements show an average of 88.63 mms, 39.95 mms, 53.03 mms and 2538 sq mms for left side (length, breadth, height and surface area). In controls the same parameters showed 70.14 mms, 27.34 mms, 49.7 mms and 1345 sq mms for left and 72.2, 27.4, 49.81 and 1391.89 sq mms for right foot.
There is an obvious increase in all parameters, length, breadth, height and surface area in climbers compared to controls. It is also noted that the increase is directly proportional to the number of years of practice of the profession. However, oddly, the increase – trend gets arrested with the climbers attaining about 3 decades experience in profession, in fact, there is an overall dip in all dimensions thereafter. The decrease is seen in length, breadth and increase in arch height.
Visual observations showed both feet in most climbers, especially those with a number of years of adherence to profession, had ‘in-situ’ partial inversion of foot. The hallux itself was invariably separated wide from the fellow toes (hallux valgus). Calcaneovarus and adduction deformation of both feet were also seen. Callosities were found pressure spots on plantar surface and on the medial edge dermal changes could be not just due to the stresses transmitted by climbing, but also to the friction and tribadic pressures brought about by rapid descent from the tree tops.
The results of statistical analysis of data using students unpaired ‘t’ test reveals that the ‘P’ value is highly significant in the parameters of length, breadth and surface area for both feet. The P value for arch height is significant for left foot, and highly significant for the right (Table V & VI).
Discussion
The tree-climbing activity is traditionally carried out by isolated communities, the men-folk adept in the art of tree climbing. The communities engaged in this professional calling are the Idiga, Thiyya Namdhari and Billava. The trees are scaled through a series of upward hops along the vertical face of the trunk, the exercise calling for flexion, abduction extension and lateral rotation of hip, flexion extension at knee, plantar and dosiflexion at ankle, inversion at the subtalar articulations and flexion at metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the foot. To assist leverage, a ‘rattan’ loop is worn around the waist, which in turn is wound around the tree trunk. A similar loop worn across the ankles prevents the splaying of feet, keeping them approximated to the trunk surface at all times of ascent or descent5. The climb induces tremendous gravitational strain on the tibiotalar and intertarsal joints. Each professional climber works around 4 hours a day and scales 25-30 trees.
Normal (age) |
Mean |
Std. Error of Mean |
|---|---|---|
40.74 |
051 |
|
Tree Climbers (age) |
42.92 |
1.11 |
Experience(Tree climbers) |
20.14 |
1.15 |
Normal |
Left |
Right |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean |
Std. Error of Mean |
Mean |
Std. Error of Mean |
|
A. Length |
70.14± |
2.08 |
72.20 |
2.71 |
B. Breadth |
27.34 |
1.28 |
27.40 |
1.19 |
C. Height |
49.70 |
1.19 |
49.81 |
1.26 |
D. Surface Area |
1345.06 |
98.26 |
1391.00 |
99.88 |
Tree Climbers |
||||
A. Length |
88.63 |
1.19 |
89.00 |
1.15 |
B. Breadth |
39.95 |
1.00 |
39.02 |
0.74 |
C. Height |
53.03 |
0.69 |
53.29 |
0.64 |
D. Surface Area |
2538.82 |
84.28 |
2587.97 |
76.20 |
Experience (years) |
<10 years |
10-20 years |
20-30 years |
>30 years |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Side |
Parameters |
Mean |
Std.err of Mean |
Mean |
Std.err of Mean |
Mean |
Std.err of Mean |
Mean |
Std.err of Mean |
Left side |
A. Length |
85.11 |
2.49 |
87.18 |
1.90 |
92.96 |
2.20 |
91.36 |
2.95 |
B. Breadth |
35.07 |
1.67 |
39.76 |
1.36 |
44.28 |
2.37 |
42.43 |
2.63 |
|
C. Height |
51.25 |
1.43 |
53.08 |
1.19 |
53.06 |
1.41 |
56.432 |
1.28 |
|
D. Surface Area |
2232.11 |
162.85 |
2547.06 |
116.78 |
2802.6 |
189.79 |
2661.4 |
224.57 |
|
Right side |
A. Length |
87.14 |
2.28 |
88.74 |
1.68 |
93.63 |
2.35 |
92.50 |
3.56 |
B. Breadth |
35.82 |
1.28 |
38.85 |
1.20 |
42.21 |
1.33 |
4.036 |
2.36 |
|
C. Height |
52.41 |
1.32 |
53.38 |
1.13 |
52.81 |
1.27 |
55.61 |
1.25 |
|
D. Surface Area |
2304.11 |
140.12 |
2545.91 |
112.18 |
3016.42 |
158.97 |
2523.36 |
206.96 |
|
LEFT SIDE |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Experience |
<10 |
10-20 |
20-30 |
>30 |
Length (A) |
21.34 |
24.29 |
32.53 |
30.25 |
Breadth (B) |
28.27 |
45.43 |
61.96 |
55.19 |
Height (C) |
3.12 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
13.54 |
Surf. area (D) |
65.96 |
89.36 |
108.37 |
97.86 |
RIGHT SIDE |
||||
Length (A) |
20.69 |
22.91 |
29.68 |
28.12 |
Breadth (B) |
30.73 |
41.79 |
54.05 |
47.29 |
Height (C) |
5.22 |
7.19 |
6.04 |
11.66 |
Surf. area (D) |
65.64 |
83.03 |
116.85 |
81.41 |
Side |
Parameters |
'T' test for Equality of Means |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
T |
P |
Inference |
||
Left |
A. Length |
-7.844 |
0.000 |
Very highly Significant |
B. Breadth |
-6.790 |
0.000 |
Very highly Significant |
|
C. Height |
-2.434 |
0.016 |
Not significant |
|
D. Surface Area |
-7.750 |
0.000 |
Very highly Significant |
|
Right |
A. Length |
-7.063 |
0.000 |
Very highly Significant |
B. Breadth |
-8.101 |
0.000 |
Very highly Significant |
|
C. Height |
-2.647 |
0.009 |
Highly Significant |
|
D. Surface Area |
-8.440 |
0.000 |
Very highly Significant |
|
't' test for Equality of Means |
Inference |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
t |
Sig.2 tailed |
|||
Left |
A. Length |
-2.597 |
0.011 |
Significant |
B. Breadth |
-3.047 |
0.003 |
Significant |
|
C. Height |
-1.435 |
0.154 |
Not significant |
|
D. Surface Area |
-2.055 |
0.043 |
Significant |
|
Right |
A. Length |
-2.234 |
0.028 |
Significant |
B. Breadth |
-2.740 |
0.007 |
Highly Significant |
|
C. Height |
-0.681 |
0.498 |
Not significant |
|
D. Surface Area |
-2.609 |
0.009 |
Highly Significant |
|

- Footprints of normal adult male

- Footprints of tree-climber with 10-20 years experience
The percentages of the people who had fallen from coconut trees and had faced injuries in the different experience groups were with less than 10 year of experience 15%, in 11-20 years of experience, 26.6%, In 2130 years of experience it was 44% and in those with 30 years of experience the value was 41.3%. A total of 35.5 % (78 cases out of 220 climbers) fell down from coconut trees while doing their job8.
The results of this study show that with sustained and prolonged strain the foot undergoes permanent and quantifiable shape change The forced inversion, abuts on the osteo-myo-fascial bow of the medial longitudinal arch which over time, shows an increase in length, breadth, surface area and height.6. These changes through quite rapid in the first few years of climbing, level off in the second decade of engagement, after which the dimensions once again show a spurt in all parameters. However, after three decades of climbing, the percentage values of increase drops for length, breadth and surface area, but continues to rise for the height of arch.7
It is our inference that the foot dynamics and kinesiological exertions strain the factors maintaining the medial arch, the stress being overcome through a generalized augmentation in size and strength through intrinsic physiological compensatory counteractions. The failure of compensatory changes, with age and exposure (beyond 3 decades) leads to an arrest of these mechanisms, which now show a reduction in dimensions (and probably strength too.) The continued increase in arch height is mainly due to permanency of osteological changes in the foot architecture. The probable development of pressure induced epiphysis or bony spurs or buttresses in the tarsi through usage make the morphological adaptations in these bones permanent10, 11. The medial arch in experienced tree climbers is raised, not so much through fascial inputs, but remains so by the rigidity of the deformed bony arch base.

- Showing increase in length (A) and surface area (D) in climbers compared to normals
It is also interesting to note that, accidental falls and fatalities that are recorded from time to time from groves, usually involve very experienced and old climbers. The percentages of the people who had fallen from coconut trees and had faced injuries in the different experience, in those with 10 year of experience it was 15%, in those with 11-20 years of experience it was 26.6%, in those with 21-30 years of experience, it stood at 44% and in those with more than group 30 years of experience it was 41.3%. A total of 35.5 % (78 cases out of 220 climbers) fell down from coconut trees while doing their job. The mystery of why an experienced and highly skilled laborer should slip may now be explained through our observations that, there is abrupt cessation in progressive arch adaptation and functional efficiency after 30 years climbing. The bony arch alone, now divested of its resilience provided by arch-sustaining ligaments, is unable to sustain the stress and weight of the aged climbers 11.
It is hoped that anthropometric studies such as this one may serve to build up retrievable records of the anatomical and functional dynamics of the physical attributes of communities of ‘dying’ professions such as tree-climbing12.
References
- (2nd Ed). Delhi: Jaypee Brothers;
- Attempt at mechanical climbing of palms with special reference to coconut palm. Journal of Plantation Cops. 1997;5(1):31-35.
- [Google Scholar]
- Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(6):353-357.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tibialis posterior: a review of anatomy and biomechanics in relation to support of the medial longitudinal arch. Foot Ankle. 11:244-247.
- [Google Scholar]
- Measurement of medial longitudinal arch Nawoczenski DA Talbot KD. Archives of Phy. Med. Rehab. 1995;76(1):45-49.
- [Google Scholar]
- Structured components of the arch of the foot analyzed by radiogramatic and multivariate statistical method. Acta anat.. 1984;119(3):161-64.
- [Google Scholar]
- Biomechanics of climbing coconut trees and its implications in ankle-foot morphology. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2013;7(5):789-793.
- [Google Scholar]
- Foot Deformations in Coconut Tree Climbers of South India. Nitte University Journal of Health Science. 3:45-51.
- [Google Scholar]
- Health of coconut tree climbers of rural south India - Medical emergencies, body mass index and occupational marks- a quantitative and survey study. Journal of Diagnostic and Clinical Research. 6:57-60.
- [Google Scholar]
- The medial longitudinal arch in tree climbing communities, M. S. (Anatomy) Dissertation, Manipal University, 2001 George BM, Osteoarchitectural adaptations of foot in tree-climbing communities, Ph.D Thesis, Manipal University.
- [Google Scholar]
