Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
4 (
1
); 118-119
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703746

An Unanticipated Cause Of Intramuscular Mass – A Case Report

Department of Microbiology, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Mangalore
Department of Microbiology, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Mangalore
Taluk Hospital, Kasaragod, INDIA

Correspondence: Rekha Rai Professor, Department of Microbiology, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018. Karnataka, India. Mobile: +918242204490/92 +9182422014162 E-mail: rairekharai@rediffmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Dirofilaria are natural parasites of various species of carnivores. Man is an accidental dead end host. Human Dirofilariasis has been reported in certain parts of Southern India and is considered as an emerging zoonotic infection. A nematode extracted from an intramuscular swelling of the right forearm was identified as Dirofilaria immitis based on the morphological and microscopic characters.The sole purpose of this article was to review the clinical course and management of an intramuscular mass.

Keywords

Dirofilaria
Intramuscular
Mass
Zoonotic

Introduction :

Cases of zoonotic filariasis caused by filarial nematodes transmitted mostly by zooanthrophilic vectors occur worldwide, apparently with increasing incidence.1 Human dirofilariasis has not been widely recognized in India, but there is probably a focus of infection in Kerala and the disease is relatively common in Srilanka which is geographically closer to southern India.2 There has been an increased occurrence of filarial worms in the subcutaneous tissues and subconjunctival space of human beings belonging to different areas of the state of Kerala.2,3 Filariasis, an accidental infection in human beings is on rise in certain parts of Southern India and is considered as an emerging zoonotic infection.

Case History :

A young tempo driver working at Calicut and hailing from Karichery in Kasargod district, Kerala reported to Taluk hospital in Kasargod with complaints of swelling and tenderness over right forearm, which gradually increased in size over a period of time. Patient did not give any history of trauma or similar swelling in the past.

Physical examination showed, a firm oval swelling measuring approximately 3.5 x 2.5 cms, on the anterior aspect of the forearm. There was no evidence of digital neurovascular defect. Clinical diagnosis of an intramuscular neoplasm was made. Exploration done under general anaesthesia revealed a 16 cm thread like worm entangled in it. The worm was sent in formalin to the microbiology laboratory for further identification. A peripheral smear done for microfilaraemia was found to be negative. The haematological and biochemical investigations were within normal limits. ELISA for filarial antigen was negative.

Parasitological findings :

The worm (Fig.1) was long, white, thread-like cylindrical measuring 16 cms in length and a maximum diameter of 0.20 mm. Microscopic examination of the worm was done by glycerin wet mount which showed a slightly curved, pointed and unarmed cephalic end. The caudal end was rounded and well pronounced. Further observation showed short oesophagus, short tail and a patent sub terminal anus with spicule and three pairs of large caudal papillae, one ofwhich was post anal. The above features were suggestive of the worm belonging to the family Dirofilaria. The cuticle appeared thick and smooth with 2-3 distinct layers. Muscles appeared to be separated into dorsal and ventral bands. Indistinct longitudinal ridges with cross striations were seen (Fig.2). Morphologically, based on the size and the arrangement of the longitudinal ridges and cross striations the worm was diagnosed as belonging to the species Dirofilaria immitis.

The patient recovered completely after the excision of the swelling and removal of the worm

Macroscopic appearence: White, thread-like cylindrical worm
Fig: I
Macroscopic appearence: White, thread-like cylindrical worm
Glycerine wet mount:Indistinct longitudinal ridges with cross striations.
Fig: II
Glycerine wet mount:Indistinct longitudinal ridges with cross striations.

Discussion :

Zoonotic filariasis occur when humans are accidentally infected by filariae normally found in animals.8 Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria of the subgenus Nochtiella are parasites found in dogs predominantly, occasionally transmitted to humans. Clinical manifestations after infection include nodules in subcutaneous tissues, muscles and visceral organs.4

The size, nature of the cuticles, ridges and arrangement of the striations discussed here were indicative of Dirofilaria immitis. Dirofilaria should be considered as a differential diagnosis for migratory subcutaneous swellings and conjunctival nodules in Kerala and elsewhere in Southern India. In human infection, parasite development is impaired and microfilaria is not produced.5 However it is important to identify the nematode as Dirofilaria to avoid treatment with antihelminthic drugs.6 Treatment by surgical removal of the worm is usually simple and effective.7There is usually no need for chemotherapeutic intervention as microfilaraemia is extremely rare.8

References:

  1. , . Zoonotic filariasis. Clinical Microbiology Rev. 1998;11:366-381.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 1978;71:123-124.
  3. , , . Dirofilariasis in dogs and humans in Kerala. Indian J Med Res. 2005;121:691-693.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Subconjunctival infection with Dirofilaria repens. IMAJ. 2006;8:139.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Dirofilariasis in man. 1998:218-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . Human Dirofilariasis. Indian journal of Medical Microbiology. 2003;21((1)):65.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Human ocular dirofilariasis in Kerala Southern India. Indian journal of pathology and microbiology. 2000;43:77-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Subcutaneous dirofilariasis in southern India: a case report. Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parsitology. 2005;99((4)):437-440.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections