Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
3 (
2
); 051-057
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703654

Butt And Hit - The Heart Kidney Saga: A Snap Shot And Long Term Perspectives

Dept of Medicine, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018
Dept of Medicine, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018

Correspondence: Raghava Sharma Professor, Department of Medicine K. S. Hegde Medical Acadamy, NITTE University Deralakatte, Mangalore- 575 018 +909448770919 rrsharma1967@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Tobacco smoking is an universal problem. There are about 120 million smokers in India in the age group of 30-69 years and have an increased cardiovascular and renal risks in addition to other risks attributable to smoking..

The present study was aimed to assess the cardiovascular and renal risks especially among the young smokers in the age group of 20-40 years. After all necessary administrative and ethical clearances a cross sectional study was conducted at the tertiary care medical college hospital located at Mangalore. 75 young male smokers in the age group of 20-40 years along with equal number of age, sex matched non smokers as controls were recruited and each one were assessed for Blood pressure(BP), Electro cardiographic changes(ECG changes), and Glomerular filtration rate(GFR).

In the present study Smoking resulted in high systolic blood pressure and prolonged QT interval (QTc) as compared to the non smokers, thus increasing the risk of Sudden cardiac death among smokers. Longer duration of smoking of more than 10 years resulted in Pre hypertension and reduced GFR in comparison to smokers with lesser duration of smoking of less than 10 years.

This study highlights the need to tackle “Smoking” among young adults more aggressively to avoid the potential cardiovascular and renal complications, as Tobacco smoking is a major modifiable risk factor for the same.

Keywords

RCH
Tobacco smoking
Young adults
Cardiovascular and renal risks
Sudden cardiac death
QT interval
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR)

Introduction

Tobacco smoking is an universal problem and a malady more so among young adults. Tobacco use in different population groups is reported to have a prevalence of 15% to over 50% among men1. Large household surveys in recent years have shown that there are about 120 million smokers in India, of whom 37% are all men and 5% are all women in the age group of 30-69 years. Smoking may soon account for 20% of all male deaths and 5% of all female deaths among Indians in the age group of 30-69 1 years

More than 4000 compounds have been identified in the tobacco smoke. This complex mixture of chemical substances has unique pro inflammatory and cyto toxic effects2

Ill effects of smoking (Nicotine) on cardiovascular and renal systems can be attributed to the following mechanisms:

  • Smoking (Nicotine) exerts effect on the proximal tubule and renal haemo dynamics resulting in increased GFR, sodium chloride excretion, and urine flow3,4.

  • Smoking(Nicotine) causes marked attenuation of alpha and beta adrenergic blockade, prolonged increase in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine, thus leading to a marked and prolonged increase in heart rate and blood pressure5

  • Smoking (Nicotine) accelerates atherosclerotic process by its pro sclerotic and pro thrombotic effects.

  • Smoking (Nicotine) has an unfavorable influence on autonomic balance leading to QT prolongation and prolonged QTc with a lowered ventricular threshold and occurrence of sudden cardiac death6.

Materials and Methods

The present cross sectional study conducted at the tertiary care medical college hospital at Mangalore, coastal Karnataka comprised of 75 young male smokers in the age group of 20-40 years, who smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day for more than 5 years. Age and sex matched controls were also drawn. Females, hypertensives, diabetics, patients with known renal diseases, patients taking drugs that affect QT interval and patients taking drugs affecting GFR were excluded from the study.

After obtaining written informed consent from each participant a detailed history with particular emphasis on duration and number of cigarettes smoked was sought and a thorough clinical examination was performed. Blood pressure (BP) was recorded from the right arm in sitting posture using mercury sphygmomanometer by a single person (to avoid inter personal variability). An average of two BP readings taken five minutes apart was considered for analysis. Blood sample for creatinine estimation was drawn soon after BP measurement and GFR was calculated using creatinine clearance rate using the cockroftt gault formula. Ccr =(140- Age ) X weight [kg] Cr?[mg/dl]72

Electro cardiograph (ECG) was obtained at the same time and analyzed for any abnormalities in terms of rate, rhythm, axis deviation, chamber hypertrophy, ischaemia, and QT prolongation.

Chi square test was employed for analysis of observations and conclusions were drawn from the same.

Observations and Results

  • In the present study, mean age of smokers was 31.27 years while it was the same 31.78 years for the non smoker control group also (Table 1).

  • Maximum smokers belonged to the age group of 26-30 years (Table 2).

  • Raised systolic BP in the pre hypertension range of 121130 mmHg was noted in the 61.2% of smokers as compared to 38.8% among non smokers.(Table 3, Fig 1). Out of this 65.2% had a smoking history of more than 10 years while 28.8% had less than 10 years of smoking history, thus demonstrating a clear statistically significant (P < 0.0001) correlation between smoking, duration of smoking and raised systolic BP (Table 4, Fig 2) There was no significant correlation with respect to diastolic BP between smokers and non smokers and with respect to duration of smoking.( Table 5, Fig 3 ).

  • QTc interval was significantly prolonged in smokers as compared to non smokers, which was statistically significant with P < 0.05. However no correlation was found in relation to the duration of smoking. (Table 6, Fig 4).

  • GFR decreased with increased duration of smoking ( > 10 years ) as compared to lesser duration of smoking ( < 10 years ), which was statistically significant with P = 0.042. However there was no statistically significant difference of GFR between smokers and non smokers. (Table 7&8, Fig 5&6).

Discussion

Effect of smoking on cardiovascular and renal system is very vital and forms a long term perspective particularly among young adults. The present study being unique has addressed this issue by involving young adults in the age group of 20-40 years only.

Wang et al7 had observed that young smokers were at higher risk of developing cardiovascular risks as compared to older adults. Study by Paola et al8 on older men demonstrated a higher systolic BP among smokers as compared to non smokers ( 144 mmhg Vs 140 mmhg ), but with no such differences in diastolic BP among the two groups. However our study conducted on young men also confirms the same, which was statistically significant too (P < 0.05).

Study by Okubo et al9 found lesser systolic BP in light to moderate smokers as compared to non smokers (121 mmhg Vs 123 mmhg). However Our study contradicts the above findings as higher percentage of smokers were in the Pre hypertension range (defined as systolic BP of 121-139 mmhg or diastolic BP of 81-89 mmhg by JNC 7) compared to non smokers and systolic hypertension was evident in smokers with prolonged duration of smoking ( > 10 years ) as compared to lesser duration of smoking (<10 years ). The above findings of our study may be attributed to chronic smoking induced atherogenesis in large capacitance vessels which is easily amenable to correction by modifying the risk factor of smoking.

Study by Mehmet illeri et al6,9 demonstrated smoking predisposes to prolongation of QT interval and QTc dispersion, thus increasing the risk of sudden cardiac death in them due to lowered ventricular fibrillation threshold and pro arrhythmic effect of catecholamine and nor epinephrine spillover. Our present study reconfirms the same and was statistically significant too with P < 0.05.

Halimi et al10 in his study on the effects of smoking on renal function concluded that creatinine clearance was higher in smokers as compared to non smokers (100.6ml/min Vs 98.8ml/min) and the glomerular hyper filtration was associated with increased intra glomerular pressure and proteinuria. Our present study also confirmed a higher GFR among smokers compared to non smokers but was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05 ).

Conclusions

From the present study we conclude the following:

  • Smoking predisposes to pre hypertension, systolic hypertension and prolonged QT interval among young smokers as compared to age, sex matched non smokers, thus increasing their risk to develop overt hypertension and associated cardiovascular complications including sudden cardiac death.

  • Prolonged duration of smoking (> 10 years) results in GFR reduction and raised systolic blood pressure, thus increasing the risk of long term cardiovascular complications and also long term deterioration of renal functions among young smokers.

  • Young smokers form an important risk group who require to be “COUNCELLED TO QUIT SMOKING” to prevent long term smoking induced cardiovascular and renal risks. THIS GOES A LONG WAY IN ACHIEVING A POLLUTION FREE ENVIRONMENT AND ALSO A PRODUCTIVE, HEALTHY YOUNG POPULATION AND SOCIETY.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics between smokers and non-smokers.

Smokers

Non smokers (mean)

P value (mean)

Age(yrs)

31.27

31.78

0.490

BMI(kg/m2)

26.55

27.66

0.066

Creatinine(mg/dl)

1.01

1.06

0.069

GFR(ml/min)

88

85

0.289

SBP mmHg

124

115

0.00

DBP mmHg

73

73.32

0.099

Pulse rate(rate/min)

81

78

0.577

Corrected QT (m s)

427

367

0.000

Number of cigarettes /day

16.2

-

-

Duration of smoking in years

9.22

-

-

Table 2 Age distribution between smokers and non smokers.

Smoker / NonSmoker

Total

Nonsmoker

Smoker

Age Group

20-25 Count

% within Age Group

2

3

5

40.0%

60.0%

100.0%

26-30 Count

% within Age Group

33

35

68

48.5%

51.5%

100.0%

31-35 Count

% within Age Group

21

19

40

52.5%

47.5%

100.0%

36-40 Count

% within Age Group

19

18

37

51.4%

48.6%

100.0%

Total    Count

75

75

150

% within Age Group

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

X2=0.386, p=0.943

Table 3 Systolic Blood pressure distribution between the two groups.

Smoker / Non Smoker

Total

Nonsmoker

Smoker

SBP group

100-110   Count

% within SBP group

27

11

38

71.1%

28.9%

100.0%

111-120   Count

% within SBP group

28

20

48

58.3%

41.7%

100.0%

121-130   Count

% within SBP group

19

30

49

38.8%

61.2%

100.0%

131-140   Count

% within SBP group

1

12

13

7.7%

92.3%

100.0%

>140     Count

% within SBP group

0

2

2

.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Total      Count     75

75

150

% within SBP group

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

X2=21.847, p=0.0001

TABLE 4 Comparison between SBP and Duration of smoking.

duration of smoking group

Total

<10 years

>10 years

SBP group 100-110   Count

% within SBP group

% within duration of smoking group

9

2

11

81.8%

18.2%

100.0%

17.3%

8.7%

14.7%

111-120   Count

% within SBP group

% within duration of smoking group

19

1

20

95.0%

5.0%

100.0%

36.5%

4.3%

26.7%

121-130   Count

% within SBP group

% within duration of smoking group

15

15

30

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

28.8%

65.2%

40.0%

131-140   Count

% within SBP group

% within duration of smoking group

7

5

12

58.3%

41.7%

100.0%

13.5%

21.7%

16.0%

<140      Count

% within SBP group

% within duration of smoking group

2

0

2

100.0%

.0%

100.0%

3.8%

.0%

2.7%

Total                   Count

52

23

75

% within SBP group

69.3%

30.7%

100.0%

X2=13.844, p=0.008

TABLE 5 Diastolic Blood pressure distribution between smokers and non smokers.

Smoker / Non Smoker

Total

Nonsmoker

Smoker

DBP group 60-70     Count

% within DBP group

29

41

70

41.4%

58.6%

100.0%

71-80     Count

% within DBP group

40

27

67

59.7%

40.3%

100.0%

81-90     Count

% within DBP group

6

7

13

46.2%

53.8%

100.0%

Total                 Count

75

75

150

% within DBP group

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

X2=4.656, p=0.097

Table 6 QTc between smokers and non smokers

Smoker / Non Smoker

Total

Nonsmoker

Smoker

QTcgroup <444     Count

% within QTcgroup

74

68

142

52.1%

47.9%

100.0%

>444     Count

% within QTcgroup

1

7

8

12.5%

87.5%

100.0%

Total      Count     75

% within QTcgroup

75

150

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

X2=4.754, p=0.029

Table 7 GFR between smokers and non smokers

Smoker / Non Smoker

Total

Nonsmoker

Smoker

GFRgroup

60 -75

Count

17

15

32

% within GFRgroup

53.1%

46.9%

100.0%

76- 90

Count

37

33

70

% within GFRgroup

52.9%

47.1%

100.0%

91-105

Count

14

22

36

% within GFRgroup

38.9%

61.1%

100.0%

106-120

Count

7

5

12

% within GFRgroup

58.3%

41.7%

100.0%

Total

Count

75

75

150

% within GFRgroup

50.0%

50.0%

100.0%

X2=2.465, p=0.482

Table 8 Comparison of GFR with duration of smoking

duration of smoking group

Total

<10 years

>10 years

GFR group 60-75     Count

% within GFR group

% within duration of smoking group

8

7

15

53.3%

46.7%

100.0%

15.4%

30.4%

20.0%

76-90      Count

% within GFRgroup

% within duration of smoking group

20

13

33

60.6%

39.4%

100.0%

38.5%

56.5%

44.0%

91-105    Count

% within GFR group

% within duration of smoking group

19

3

22

86.4%

13.6%

100.0%

36.5%

13.0%

29.3%

106-120   Count

% within GFR group

% within duration of smoking group

5

0

5

100.0%

.0%

100.0%

9.6%

.0%

6.7%

Total       Count      52

% within GFR group

% within duration of smoking group

23

75

69.3%

30.7%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

X2=8.201,p=0.042

Higher percentage of young smokers in the pre-hypertension range as compared to age matched non smokers (61.2 % VS 38.8%).
Figure 1.
Higher percentage of young smokers in the pre-hypertension range as compared to age matched non smokers (61.2 % VS 38.8%).
Diastolic Blood pressure between the two groups comparable but not statistically significant.
Figure 3
Diastolic Blood pressure between the two groups comparable but not statistically significant.
GFR between smokers and non smokers comparable but not statistically significant.
Figure 5.
GFR between smokers and non smokers comparable but not statistically significant.
SBP (pre hypertensive range) significantly higher among smokers with smoking duration more than 10 years.
Figure 2.
SBP (pre hypertensive range) significantly higher among smokers with smoking duration more than 10 years.
QTc in smokers significantly higher than non smokers.
Figure 4.
QTc in smokers significantly higher than non smokers.
GFR reduction significantly higher with prolonged duration (>10years) of smoking.
Figure 6
GFR reduction significantly higher with prolonged duration (>10years) of smoking.

References

  1. , , , , . Tobacco use in India: Prevalence and predictors of smoking and chewing in a national cross sectional household survey. Tobacco control. 2003;12((4))
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 2: chemical composition of main stream smoke. Food chem. Toxicol. 2002;40:93-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . The renal risks of smoking. Kidney international. 1997;51:1669-1677.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Smoking and kidney. Nephro Dial and transplant. 2000;15:1509-1511.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Mechanisms responsible for sympathetic activation by cigarette smoking in humans. Circulation. 1994;90:248-253.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Effect of habitual smoking on QT interval and dispersion. American journal of cardiology. 2001;88:322-325.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Nicotine depresses the function of multiple cardiac potassium channels. Life Sci;. 1999;65:143-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Association between smoking and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2001;37:187-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. . Miyamoto, Ysuwazono. An association between smoking habits and blood pressure in normotensive Japanese men. Journal of human hypertension. 2002;16:91-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , . Effects of current smoking and smoking discontinuation on renal function and proteinuria in the general population. Kidney international. 2000;58:1285-1292.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections