Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
7 (
2
); 42-49
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1708709

Compartment Syndrome- Controversies and where are we Today

Pro Chancellor, Nitte University & Professor, Dept. of Orthopedics, Tejasvini Hospital
Senior Consultant, Dept. of Orthopedics, Tejasvini Hospital
Professor, Dept. of Radio diagnosis, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy
Senior Resident, Dept. of Orthopedics, Tejasvini Hospital

Corresponding Author: M. Shantharam Shetty, Pro Chancellor, Nitte University & Professor, Dept. of Orthopedics, Tejasvini Hospital, Mangalore

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Compartment Syndrome in Orthopedic practice is a night mare and has to be diagnosed and treated as an emergency to save the function of the limb. Importance of different criteria of early diagnosis, compartment pressure measurement and immediate fasciotomy are the controversies even today. The review emphasizes the importance of these concerns.

Definition

Compartment syndrome occurs due to an increased interstitial tissue pressure inside a closed 1 space especially in an osseo-fascial compartment, should be treated as an acute emergency.

Historical Review

It was Volkmann2 who described for the first time Ischemia of forearm muscles due to venous stasis resulting in irreversible contracture.

Ellis, 1958 and Seddon, 1966 contributed to this entity, especially in the treatment of lower extremity. All the retrospective reviews have advised the early recognition of the syndrome and fasciotomies of the affected limbs.

Advanced compartment syndrome with contractures
Fig. 1:
Advanced compartment syndrome with contractures

The Controversies in Compartment Syndrome today are:

  1. Initial Diagnosis

  2. Whether measuring compartment pressure is useful and how often

  3. Most important is the management and timing of fasciotomy

Early or late is a very relative term and more so for compartment syndrome in a limb since every minute counts to save a limb, prevent a deformity or an amputation or rarely even to save the life of a patient.

Acute compartment syndrome with blisters
Fig. 2:
Acute compartment syndrome with blisters

Common fractures causing compartment syndrome

Schatzker's VI
Schatzker's VI
Displaced supracondylar fracture
Displaced supracondylar fracture

Etiology

Compartment syndrome can be caused due to closed or openfractures3, blunt trauma, temporary vascular occlusion, plaster/dressing, closure of fascial defects, burns/electrical, exertional states, GSW, IV/A-lines, hemophiliac/ coagulopathies, intra osseous IV(infant) snake bite and arterial injury.

Of these, 80% are due to trauma usually associated with high energy injuries like Tibial Condoyle fractures, supracondylar or pilon fractures (fig. 3), mainly due to spasm of vessels or injury to the vessel or tight constriction bandages.

Pilon C3
Fig. 3:
Pilon C3

The disastrous sequelae of compartment syndrome are infection, ischemic contractures, crush syndrome & acute renal failure, partial / complete loss of function, amputation and even death.

Controversy No. 1: Diagnosis

The 5 P's are signs and symptoms4 of compartment syndrome - pain out of proportion- stretch pain, parasthesia, pallor, paralysis and pulselessness. The pain is like a child who is deprived of its milk. Here, the muscles are deprived of its blood supply. Unfortunately, it is missed in a polytrauma situation, hypotensive or obtunded patient. It may also be a silent compartment syndrome when there is altered consciousness, spinal or epidural, neurological deficit, sometimes even in open fractures.

Pathogenesis described by Mateson & Krugmirev5

Arterial occlusion occurs at the later stages of compartment syndrome. It is important to recognize Compartment syndrome prior to this.

Skin Blisters can indicate the depth of Compartment Pressure, deep or superficial.

Skin blisters should also be differentiated between fluid filled or blood filled to know whether the pressure change is in the epidermis or deeper.

Skin blisters are a sign of impending compartment syndrome.

If Skin Blisters are

  • Fluid filled blistersindicatecleavage within epidermis itself and will heal without scar or pigmentation.

  • Blood filled blisters indicate cleavage of epidermis from dermis and heal with scar or pigmentation.

Skin blisters are a sign of impending compartment syndrome. Serial hourly pressure measurements are needed then. Plan - Wait and watch or undertake fasciotomy.

Controversy No. 2

Should we measure the intra compartment pressure? Answer is an emphatic yes, both from the diagnostic and legal point of view.

Techniques available are:

  1. Simple needle with a slit catheter.

  2. whitesides technique

  3. Hand held monitors

  4. stryker devices

  5. manometric IV pump method near infrared spectroscopy

  6. Laser dopler flowmetry etc

However, these are not substitutes for clinical diagnosis.

Pressure Measurements6

Simple Needle -18 gauge is least accurate, usually gives falsely higher reading.

Slit Catheter & Side ported needle is more accurate.

WHITESIDES TECHNIQUE HAND HELD MONITOR
WHITESIDES TECHNIQUE HAND HELD MONITOR

Muscle Perfusion Pressure

Compartment Pressurecan be gauged by diastolic blood pressure or intra compartmental pressure. If muscle perfusion pressure > 30 mm Hg, it result in Hypoxia and anaerobic cell metabolism. Blood pressure has a direct relationship to perfusion pressure.

Measurements should be done in all the compartments; especially, in the leg, forearm and thigh. For example, all four compartments in the leg. Normal compartment pressure varies from 5 - 15 mm.

Pressure measurements7,8:

Normal tissue pressure 0–4 mm Hg 8–10 with exertion
Absolute pressure theory as described 30 mm Hg -Mubarak method 45 mm Hg -Matsen method
Pressure gradient theory < 20 mm Hg of diastolic pressure - by White sides technique (McQueen, et al9)

Uliaz A et al10, reported comparing stryker, mono metric intravenous pump and white sides, latter is unreliable of the three.

Garfin, Mubarak et al11 reported 85 - 90% reduction of compartment pressure by taking off the plasters.

It is to be noted that all types of analgesia does not necessarily delay the clinical diagnosis12 of Acute compartment syndrome provided high degree of clinical suspicion and continuous monitoring of compartment pressure studies are followed.

Controversy No. 3

When do we undertake fasciotomy? Answer is as early as possible once the diagnosis is established13.

5 P’s of compartment syndrome Blood pressure Intracompartment pressure Management
Positive normotensive >30 mm Hg Immediate fasciotomy
Unequivocal findings / comatose patients hypotensive >20 mmHg Immediate fasciotomy

Indications for Fasciotomy

However withsignificant tissue injury or high risk patient, with > 6 hours of total limb ischemia, with unequivocal clinical findings, pressure within 15-20 mm hg of diastolic blood pressure, rising tissue pressure necessitates urgent fasciotomy.

Contraindication - Missed compartment syndrome especially after 24-48 hrs.

For the leg compartment syndrome, either a single or a double incision as shown in figure (6) is desirable.

ANTEROLATERAL SKIN INCISION POSTEROMEDIAL INCISION
Fig. 6:
ANTEROLATERAL SKIN INCISION POSTEROMEDIAL INCISION

Double incision technique14 is easier, faster, and safer and is recommended when all 4 compartments of leg are to be decompressed.

However, Percutaneous fasciotomy is not indicated since the skin, as long as it remains intact, acts as a limiting membrane and may sustain the compartment syndrome. All four compartments need to be released.

On opening the compartments, evaluation of muscle viability can be done by looking into color, contractility, consistency and capillary bleeding (Fig.7). In very late cases, the muscles will be darkish and no bleeding.

Fig. 7:
Done early
Done early
done late
done late
very late
very late

Compartment syndrome of thigh15

Anterior and posterior compartment can be decompressed by single lateral incision. Medial incisions may be needed if adductor compartment is to be decompressed.

In other common sites like forearm, hand, thigh and foot, the principles are the same.

Volar approach
Volar approach
Dorsal Approach
Dorsal Approach
Fig. 8:

Hand and Foot

In the hand and foot, all compartments are to be released. (Fig. 9, 10 & 11)

Fig. 9:
Fig. 10:
Fig. 11:

Foot

Is there a role for Joint spanning external fixator - a definitive YES.

Ligamentotaxis effect by the knee spanning fixators16 transiently elevates intra compartment of causing acute compartment syndrome however it's a useful tool in injuries around the knee.

Fasciotomy Closure can be done in one of the following ways:

Wound left open + VAC dressing, skin sutured 3-5 days later (when swelling subsides) +/− split skin grafts and keep limb elevated.

Fig. 12:
Fig. 13:

The publications quoted from 7 countries17,18,19,20,21,22 have emphasized early diagnosis is the key determinant in avoiding the poor outcomes in Acute compartment syndrome.

As far as tissue survival is concerned,

  • Muscle23

    • - 3-4 hours resultsreversible changes

    • - 6 hours variable damage occurs

    • - 8 hours irreversible changes

  • Nerve24

    • - Till 1 hrconducts impulses

    • - 2 hrslooses conduction

    • - 4 hrs-neuropraxia

    • - 8 hrs-irreversible damage

    • - If compartment syndrome has persisted for > 8-10 hrs, one should be aware and vigilant about the possibilities of acute renal failure (ARF) as noted by Kanlic EM et al in his study and prompt management of ARF should be considered.

    • - Skin is left intact and late reconstructive methods to be planned for sequalae25 of compartment syndrome.

Time to Fasciotomy from onset of Compartment Syndrome Percentage of patients regaining Normal function
Less than 12 hours 68%
More than 12 hours 8%

Sherdan et al26 in his case series observed that routine fasciotomy has less beneficial role in delayed diagnosed cases of acute compartment syndrome.

What is the role of fracture fixation in compartment syndrome?

First, stabilized temporarily by external fixation. Internal fixation is planned once the soft tissue equilibrium is achieved.

Hak D.J et al27 in his comparative analysis found that prior fasciotomy in proximal tibial fractures does not increase the risk of deep infection after open reduction and internal fixation. Bhargava R et al28 in his retrospective study patients with impending compartment syndrome with proximal tibial fractures treated with single stage procedure with fasciotomy and definitive internal fixation noticed to have excellent results, however large number of patient series and multi centric studies are needed to further validate this finding.

The above mentioned studies showed that definitive internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures in the presence of open fasciotomy wounds does not seem to be associated with an increased infection risk.

Fig. 1430:
Fig. 1530:

Cole et al29 in his prospective assessment of compartment pressure in legs after LISS FIXATION found out that less invasive method of fixation does not necessarily increase intra compartment pressure.

These three cases depict how one can deal with compartment syndrome either a success story or a disappointing failure.

Compartment Syndrome recognized early

Fig. 1630:
Faciotomy & Ex-fixator and skin grafting done.
Faciotomy & Ex-fixator and skin grafting done.
Definitive fixation
Definitive fixation
Final result
Final result

Case - 2: 28 years old with knee injury

Closed type VI Tibial Condyle Fractures
Fig. 17:
Closed type VI Tibial Condyle Fractures
Fasciotomy done and spanning fixator applied
Fasciotomy done and spanning fixator applied
Steps of operation
Fig. 18:
Steps of operation
With hybrid external fixature
With hybrid external fixature
Final result
Fig. 19:
Final result

Definitive conclusions for the controversies in compartment syndrome

Compartment syndrome is an acute emergency. Clinical signs of 5 Ps are paramount.when there is suspicion, be positive. Measure the perfusion pressure and act if intra compartment pressure above 30 mm (Mubarak et al) or pressure gradient within 30 mm of diastolic pressure (McQueen et al).

Fasciotomy is reliable, safe and effective provided done on time, preferably within 8 hours of onset of symptoms. All the compartments are to be released. Temporary ex-fix followed by definitive fixation is safe if the mentioned principles are adhered to. More than 12 hrs of the onset better to treat the residual problems

References

  1. , . ‘The pathophysiology of the anterior tibial compartment syndrome: an experimental investigation,’. J Trauma. 1978;18((5)):299-304.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. . ‘The ischemic muscular paralysis and trauma. ‘Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie’. 1881;vol. 8:801-803. pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . ‘Acute compartment syndrome. Who is at risk?,’. JBJS(Br). 2000;82B:200.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . ldquo;Diagnosing acute compartment syndrome,’. JBJS(Br). 2003;85:625.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . ‘Diagnosis and management of compartmental syndromes,’. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-Series A. 1980;vol. 62(no. 2):286-291. pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . ‘The reliability of measurement of tissue pressure in compartment syndrome,’. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:24.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . ‘Muscle blood flow disturbances produced by simultaneously elevated venous and total muscle tissue pressure,’. Microvasc Res. 1980;20:307.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . ‘Compartment monitoring in tibialfractures,’. JBJS (Br). 1996;78:99.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Acute compartment syndrome: who is at risk? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;82:200-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , et al.. Comparing the methods of measuring compartment pressures in acute compartment syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21:143.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Compartment syndromes of the forearm: diagnosis and treatment. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1981;161:252-261.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . ‘Acute Compartment Syndrome of the Lower Limb and the Effect of Postoperative Analgesia on Diagnosis,’. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2009;Vol. 102(No. 1):3-11. pp.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . ‘The treatment of compartment syndromes of the leg,’. JBJS (Br). 1984;66:93-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . ‘Double incision fasciotomy of the leg for decompression in compartment syndrome,’. JBJS(Am). 1977;59:184-187.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Acute morbidity amd complications of thigh compartment syndrome’: a report of 26 cases. ‘Patient Safety in Surgery. 2010;4:13.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , et al.. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA type II) treated with locked plates. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2008;22((3)):159-164.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Delayed onset of Acute Limb Compartment Syndrome with Neuropathy after Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014;38((4)):575-580.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Delayed onset of anterior tibial compartment syndrome in a patient receiving low-molecular-weight Heparin. As case Report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1998;80((12)):1789-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Delayed presentation of Compartment Syndrome of the Proximal Lower Extremity after Low-energy trauma in patients taking Warfarin. Am J Orthop. 2008;37((12)):E201-E204.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , et al.. Acute compartment syndrome of Limbs -current concepts and management. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:535-543. Brighton, UK
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Anterior compartment pressure measurement in closed fractures of leg. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42:217-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , et al.. Results of Neurolysis in Established Upper Limb Volkmann's Ischemic Contracture Indian. J Orthop. 2016;50((6)):602-609.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , . ‘Acute compartment syndrome: how long before muscle necrosis occurs?,’. CJEM. 2004;6((3)):147-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , . ‘Acute compartment syndrome of the limbs:Current concepts and management. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:535-543.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. . ‘Reconstructive surgery of sequalae of compartment syndrome of the leg and foot. Presentation of a new classification,’. Unfallchrurg. 2008;111((10)):776-784.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , . Fasciotomy in the treatment of the acute compartment syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58((1)):112-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Influence of prior fasciotomy on infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. J Trauma. 2010;(69):886-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , et al.. Proximal Tibial fractures with impending Compartment Syndrome Original Article. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2015;Vol. 49:502-509. p.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Compartment pressures after submuscular fixation of proximal tibia fractures. Injury ((34 Suppl 1)):A43-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Personal communication with illustrations Dr. P.V Jayasankar, Medical Director, Sundaram Medical Foundation and Dr. Rangaraja Hospital, Chennai
Show Sections