Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
3 (
2
); 003-012
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703645

Development And Psychometric Evaluation Of The Tool Aptitude Towards Nursing

Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal University, Manipal
Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal University, Manipal

Correspondence: Maxie Andrade Asst. professor, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal University Manipal amaxie@hotmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Nursing is an attribute expected of every living being and every living being is capable of providing care to another in need. Few occasions especially the sickness, unawareness or disability call for special skills of nursing to substitute or supplement to the acute or chronic need of a living being. These skills can be acquired only through special training through a well planned curriculum. Hence in modern medicine, a group of health care providers called nurses are trained to care for the sick and the needy.

Nursing profession has been the attraction for many young adults, however, this attraction has become the passion for some, while for few others, it is still an occupation. The transformation into an effective nurse demands special psychomotor abilities. The transformation is easier and can happen at a faster pace if one possesses an aptitude towards nursing. This assumption led the researcher to develop a tool to identify such able candidates for the profession of nursing. This article explores researcher's two attempts in developing the tool, which were though not fruitful, they certainly have given an impression on the complexity of the measurement of the construct of nursing and caring.

Keywords

Aptitude towards nursing
caring
tool development

Introduction

Education is a human right and is open for every desiring citizen. It is the foundation for national growth. Diversity in medical education has opened newer courses and professional groups in health sector. Indian universities admit good number of medical and paramedical students to various courses, producing a large number of graduates. There are many who choose a profession out of their own interest, whereas some desire to explore a particular field and quit, thinking, that is not what they are good at. There are a few who leave their decisions on their loved ones and take up the profession but remain totally dissatisfied to continue in the same profession or struggle to exist in the same.

Aptitude is a condition, a quality or a set of qualities in an individual which is indicative of the probable extent to which one will be able to acquire under suitable training some knowledge, skill or composite of knowledge, understanding and skill. The chief value of aptitude testing is in fact that it enables us to pick out from those who do not yet have the ability to perform certain skills; those who with a reasonable amount of training will be most likely to acquire the skills in question and acquire them to a desirable level of a proficiency. Testing aptitude of students during admission to a professional course has been a far thought of the educational administrators, who strongly believe that aptitude of the students can be measured and moreover it is useful for the students to succeed in their career. Standardized Aptitude tests for several occupations are available and are in use; however nursing is in the look out of the same. 1, 2, 3.

Nursing is a practice oriented profession and the core of nursing is care. Nursing is both an art and a science and the nursing education includes the knowledge and skills from the basic, behavioural and applied sciences. There is remarkable progress in health sector and health care knowledge. Nurses remain with clients round the clock in the in-patient setting and are required to exhibit competent care. Nurses have to rationalize actions and act, because they are accountable and responsible for each action. Thus nursing is challenging and to face the challenges, one has to have a favourable attitude and aptitude towards nursing.4

High Power Committee on nursing and nursing profession, appointed by Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, in its report in 1990 stated, “Nursing personnel should have a complete say in matters of selection of students, which should be based on merit. Aptitude tests should be introduced for selection of candidates.” In a study titled, perceptions on nurses, nursing practice and nursing education system (2010),one of the physicians was of the opinion that nursing students' aptitude should be assessed. He said:“Practicing nurses need qualities like 'care and compassion' without which no amount of education can help. A study held in Bangalore, India on aptitude towards nursing among nursing professionals' recommended to test the aptitude of students at entry level. ”5, 6, 7

The alarming increase in the number of unemployed graduate nurses during the past three decades has caused the heads of professional schools to seek means of identifying students who will be able to measure up to the higher standards necessary if the profession of nursing is to maintain its position in the fields of medical and social service. Such identifications, to be effective, must be made prior to admission to schools of nursing. The alternative method of selecting qualified nurses by permitting them to "try" nursing for one, two or three years before being rejected is too wasteful of time, money, and morale. Thus the problem becomes one of testing for nursing aptitude at the time a candidate applies for admission to a school/college of nursing. It may seem that the task of identifying students with aptitude for nursing is a simple one wherein a nurse administrator looks at and talk to an applicant and differentiates the able from the unable candidates. But the task is not that easy. It becomes necessary, therefore, to use the painstaking methods of research to discover more dependable methods to identify the most suitable candidates and predict their stay in the profession. 2

A number of attempts have been made to develop tools to assess nursing aptitude. However the review reveals that these attempts are either to assess the specific ability such as math or science aptitude or for selecting students to the upper nursing division Aptitude continues to be predictive of BSN (Bachelor of Science in Nursing) students success, even as BSN student demographics and pre-nursing educational backgrounds change. Authors discuss that nurse educators should focus their attention on core predictor variables that are known and that continue to be predictive of BSN student attrition. BSN students to have holistic knowledge necessary for safe and efficient nursing practice; they must have not only a sufficient math aptitude to do clinical calculations but also the ability to read at the level demanded by the clinical questions being posed.8, 9.

The Aptitude test developed by the Asian Psychological Services and Assessment, Inc., admits that the ANP (Assessment of Nursing Potential) is a valid and reliable measure to form a strong base for selecting students for admission to the upper nursing division level. It is composed of a combination of three tests, namely: (1) Nursing attitudinal inventory (earlier known as the Nursing Quality Scale) which assesses the traits that are essential in contributing to one's success in the nursing profession; (2) Aptitude test that measures the “innate-based” learned abilities; and (3) Achievement test measuring what has been learnt in the lower nursing division level. The ANP test battery has been widely used by nursing schools in the Philippines. It is the only locally made test used for selection and placement of nursing students. It has been seen as a good preparation for the Nursing Board Examinations and foreign-based tests such as the NCLEX and CGFNS. 10

The review of literature suggested that nursing is yet to find a tool to assess the aptitude of nursing students at entry level and this encouraged the researcher to attempt development of a tool for this purpose. Currently, majority of Schools and Colleges of Nursing in India admit students purely on their pre university course marks. A very few have an entrance examination for undergraduate or diploma courses. Most of the personal interviews held at the time of admission are not true counseling sessions per se in most of the nursing schools and colleges. There is dissatisfaction expressed by experienced clinical nurses on the ability of graduated nurses to function effectively in clinical nursing practice. However, in these contexts, assessment of aptitude at the time of admission to nursing courses is believed to be useful in selection of right candidates for nursing courses.

Materials, Methods and Results:

The study assumed that aptitude is the product of innate and acquired abilities and is measurable.

Table 1 summarizes the first attempt. The subscales selected for the tool were based on the Philippines study (Assessment of Nursing Potential) and the items were developed based on those operational definitions. However these tools were not comparable as the purpose for which the tools were developed and items were different. There were eight subscales in the developed tool namely, caring, compassion, connectedness, commitment, abstract reasoning, academic aptitude, reading comprehension and verbal ability and vocational adjustment.

The items in the academic aptitude and abstract reasoning were based on the 12th standard syllabi and the items were from the Science subject including Environment and biodiversity. Content validation was done by 11 experts: Clinical Psychologist (2); Professors teaching at PU college (2); and Nursing doctorates (7). Two validators suggested to use care scenarios than the likert scale alone, thus two scenario based subscales for caring were developed and revalidated among 5 nursing experts. The samples were first year nursing students (diploma and B. Sc.) who were admitted to the course a month ago, in the Schools and Colleges of Nursing in Udupi and South Canara districts of Karnataka. Official permission from Heads of Institutions and informed consent from partcipants were obtained. The average time taken by the participants to complete the questionannire was 85 minutes. The Cronbach's alpha for the overall likert scale for 108 items was r= 0.932; overall scale test retest reliability (with a gap of 8 days between tests) was r= 0.7. The overall Split half reliability of MCQ items (caring scenario 1 &2, abstract reasoning, academic aptitude, reading comprehension, verbal ability) was r = 0.42.

Though the overall scale and test retest reliability were in the acceptable range, it was decided to condense the tool as time for administration was nearly 85 minutes. There were three decisions taken after the first attempt for the modification of the tool as follows.

  1. An opinion on excluding the subscale of academic aptitude was considered apt as the same is projected in the report card (pre-university) of the student. Moreover, as these items were based on 'science' subjects, there is likelihood that the art and commerce background students (of few diploma nursing students) may either guess answers or show no interest in attempting for the items. However the pilot study scores revealed that even students with science background could not perform on these items better.

  2. One of the nursing experts from USA opined that, “English is not the primary language in India, and hence assessment of verbal ability and reading comprehension at pre entry level may not be commendable.” This suggestion was considered apt as in Karnataka, there are few students (Arts, Science, Commerce) who enter nursing with Kannada as the medium of instruction in their preuniversity programme. Moreover majority of students who study nursing in Karnataka, are from the neighboring state of Kerala, where also similar options for the choice of the medium of instruction exist. Thus the suggestion of the expert was considered valid, as there is scope of development of this ability during the course even if it is not possessed at entry level. (The medium of instruction for diploma and graduate nursing programmes in India is English and English is taught as a subject in the first year of the nursing course).

  3. Nursing requires scientific knowledge but nursing is also an art. Nursing is a team work and the independent life saving decisions taken by nurses are of less complexity in public health care practice. In hospital settings, the health team is available within the reachable distance. The absence of abstract reasoning ability from nursing students at basic level will be supplemented by the health team members in clinical practice. Abstract reasoning is nurtured through experience and this will be developed as students undergo the training programme. Assessing these at pre entry level may give more importance to science than the art form of nursing.

Considering these suggestions, a second attempt was made and a tool was prepared with the components presented in Table 2. The subscale on reading comprehension was retained as it was believed that nursing students are taught the course in English. The items of the likert scale namely caring, compassion, connectedness and vocational adjustment were modified as per the item analysis findings of the first attempt. The component of commitment was clubbed with vocational adjustment in a separate section as part 2. (Part 1 was named as adaptation) Caring scenarios were framed as decision making ability items which included eight MCQ on positioning and feeding a bedridden adult in a family setting. Pictorial presentations were presented in order to assess visual-spatial abilities, e.g.: reading of a thermometer, graphic recording, selection of accessories/supplies for a equipment (based on the diameter of tips) or for simple dressing of a minor wound or hand hygiene. Abstract reasoning was replaced with Arithmetic ability, assuming nurses need to possess this ability as medication errors are considered serious errors in nursing. The items were pretested for readability and were given to seven experts for content validation (Two clinical psychologists and five nursing doctorates). The tool was administered in a group, ensuring a minimum distance of 3 feet between participants to avoid discussion and copying. Table 2 summarizes the findings.

The test-retest reliability of this scale was not tested, as the reliability of the subscales were comparatively lower as compared to the first attempt. The split half reliability of MCQ items was found to be comparatively better (r=0.7). The comparison of means of each subscale (presented in Table 3) revealed that there was significant difference between the groups in caring, reading comprehension, vocational adjustment(commitment) and mechanical ability.

The researcher planned to pretest the same tool among the public (receptionists and clerks), the students of other courses in health care (Respiratory therapy and Health Information System), the practicing nurses of a selected teaching hospital, second, third and fourth year students of diploma and B. Sc. Nursing courses of a nursing School and College attached to the same teaching hospital in Udupi District. The tool was administered after obtaining the informed consent and official permission from respective authorities, in a group under supervision, ensuring no copying or discussion among participants. The tool took 50 minutes for its completion on an average. The public group was administered only the likert scale. An analysis of the findings is presented in Table 4. Analysis of scores of students year wise is shown in Table 5 and 6 for B. Sc. Nursing and diploma nursing students respectively. Though the scale appeared handy to administer within an hour, the findings were not suggestive of acceptable reliability (at least r = 0.6 for each subscale).

Table 4 reveals that difference was found in commitment and mechanical ability among groups however the abilities of staff nurses and the final year B. Sc. Nursing students were a near match.

Table 5 shows that there was significant difference in the scores of B. Sc. Nursing students year wise. Post hoc test revealed difference in scores of caring, arithmetic and mechanical ability between all four groups; compassion between 1st and 3rd as well as 3rd and 4th year; connectedness between 1st and fourth as well as 2nd and 3rd; adaptation between 1st and 3rd as well as 1st and 4th; commitment between 1st and 3rd as well as 3rd and 4th; reading comprehension in 3rd and 4th; decision making between 1st and 4th year students. There was significant difference in total scores of reading, arithmetic, decision making and mechanical ability among all four year students, whereas in total scores of caring, compassion, commitment, connectedness and adaptation, there was difference in 1st and 3rd as well as 1st and 4th years; 2nd and 4th years as well as 3rd and 4th year students. Among diploma students in Table 6, significant difference was noted only in adaptation among all three batches and reading comprehension in 1st and 2nd year students as revealed through the post hoc test.

The assessments in second attempt revealed that nursing entrants of diploma and graduate nursing program differed in key abilities of caring and commitment wherein the mean scores of caring were higher among diploma students compared to that of graduate programme and vice versa was true with regard to commitment. The difference was notable in terms of reading and mechanical abilities which were attributable to their background in pre university education. The difference in caring and commitment was not acceptable by the researcher as these were considered important qualities of a nurse.

At the end of the second attempt, researcher thought to seek answer to a question, “What abilities one should look for among pre entry students apart from caring?” A survey was held among the Professors (n=7) of a selected college and two external experts. The experts were not comfortable to pinpoint the abilities, however agreed on the variables listed as subscales in the second attempt. There was no unanimous agreement on the assigned weightage, however five of them weighed decision making and caring 25% each. However one of the external expert (from USA) opined that though nursing is art and science, the science component of nursing should be assigned a weightage of 65%, which includes, arithmetic, decision making, mechanical and verbal abilities. One of the Professors from India (externl expert) gave a higher rating (90%) for caring and the Professors of the selected college ranked each ability between 10-20%.

Thus the section of arithmetic ability, decision making, reading comprehension and mechanical ability were retained as a part of the tool and it was decided to pretest the same with first year graduate students of arts, commerce and science stream after obtaining the official permission from the college authority and participants. As construct validity of the scale in second attempt was not testable because the items were not based on a sound theory, the third attempt was made to base it on Swanson's theory of caring, and this attempt is not described in this article.11

Discussion

The idea of measurement of aptitude towards nursing has been though suggested by the high power committee before 20 years, review reports two such attempts made in India to measure it scientifically. As discussed in the introduction, the published aptitude measurement scales outside India, had not been tested for their efficacy in selection of nursing students. The nursing institutes abroad, seem to be assessing nursing aptitude at entry level however published reports on their efficacy are not found.

Nursing Aptitude test (NAT) for students seeking admission to nursing institutes was attempted by Triza Jiwan (2011) who found the reliability () of r = 0.85 for cognitive and affective aptitude as well as 0.72 for conative aptitude. The one hour paper and pencil test was built around intelligence, emotional strength and psychomotor skills. The article reports that it was built on a theory and construct validity of the tool was tested on 10 experts. However the materials, methods used and the theory on which the tool was developed and tested is not clear in the 12 report.

A study by Pataliah used the subscales of memory, knowledge, vocabulary, judgment in nursing situation, ability to comprehend instructions and follow. The study used reading and verbal ability as well, however the assessment of these abilities in the current study did not display good aptitude. The current study found majority of the entrants to nursing courses were females (95.7% in first attempt; 98.8% in second attempt) and Christians (61% in 1st attempt; 55.6% in second attempt) which is very evident in most of the nursing studies.7, 13

Existing Aptitude tests have been well critiqued by several authors. A study of UK concludes stating UKCAT (United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test) scores are predictive of Year 1 and 2 examination performance at medical school, whereas interview scores are not. The results challenge, claims made by other authors that aptitude tests do not have a place in medical school selection in the UK.3

In an article David McDonald discussed on the role of intelligence and aptitude tests and how they are to be interpreted. The steps delineated by the author in development of an aptitude test, are commendable. In nursing, the psychomotor skills required are numerous though not complex. However, the introduction of technology in health care today especially in nursing situations, has brought in complexity thereby welcoming technical competency in nurses. The major areas which require clarity in nursing would be professional boundary and specificity of psychomotor skills. Most of the nursing responsibilities in today's health practice is shared by several allied professionals, moreover complexity of skills are not similar in different nursing units, let that be adult or pediatric, family, community or institution based settings.14

Caring has been conceptualized as the central and significant factor in nursing science and patient healing. However is caring measurable? Jean Watson, a pioneer in caring science states, “Caring instruments serve as indicators along the way and point back to a deeper dimension of human caring relational practices, which remain forever elusive and non-measurable. Deep philosophical ethical and ontological subjective dimension of caring cannot be measured, but some measurement can elucidate the manifest field of caring practices, while some pointing towards the non-manifest whole.” The complexity in finding the construct validity for the caring phenomena justifies Dr. Watson's statement however, painstaking efforts need to be ongoing and continued to capture the meaning of the construct to the extent possible and to be included as a measure towards nursing aptitude. 15

Nursing is a skill and assessment of nursing potential has been the need of the hour in Indian context. General aptitude tests are available and are widely used, however growing complex health care industry of today is in the lookout for efficient and effective nurses, who touch the lives of patients shortening their length of stay. Nurses with nursing aptitude may fit well in this caring industry and moreover nurse trainers may find it easy to mould these nurses at a faster rate to meet the increased demand for nurses worldwide. Screening entrants to nursing does not mean to close the door for those who are interested but do not have the right aptitude, however this screening is only to prevent burnout from repeated trying. The entrant when finds herself/himself capable to nurture the existing skill to the level required may find the profession enjoyable and aid growth of the profession.

Conclusion:

Measurements in psychosocial sciences have been tried to simplify the understanding of the concept or construct. The effectiveness of nursing is largely dependent on the psychosocial elements of care. Nursing is a broad concept and a construct (as a verb and noun), which employ comparatively simple motor skills. Nursing is a universal phenomena and ina broader sense it is self transcendence. The complexity of nursing is in its contextual factors, which vary in settings and from person to person. Nursing is percieved and experienced differently by different people that is how measurement of aptitude towards nursing has appeared complex.

Table 1 Components and reliability of the tool: Nursing aptitude

Subscales

Number of items

Range of scores

Sample

Reliability

Median (Range)

Mean (SD)

Caring1 (Personal attributes)

21

21-105

First year B.Sc. Nursing students (n=51)

First year diploma Nursing students (n=42)

0.726

52

(54)

52.48

(10.547)

Caring scenario 1

10

0-10

0.296

4

(8)

4.29 (1.639)

Caring scenario 2

6

2-12

0.331

9

(10)

8.83

(1.993)

Compassion1

16

16-80

0.755

45(43)

43.54(8.436)

Commitment1

22

22-110

0.833

61(72)

59.73(11.31)

Connectedness1

20

20-100

0.858

60(69)

58.48(10.389)

Abstract reasoning

10

0-10

0.219#

3(6)

3.09(1.544)

Academic aptitude

45

0-45

0.446#

11(18)

11.39(3.884)

Reading Comprehension

5

0-5

0.274#

2(4)

2.38(1.031)

Verbal comprehension

06

0-6

0.009#

3(5)

2.56(1.058)

Verbal comprehension (reading a passage)

04

0-4

0.026#

1(3)

1.32(0.874

Vocational adjustment1 (Social relationships)

11

11-55

0.810

32(35)

31.45(6.618)

Vocational adjustment1 (Academic)

10

10-50

0.795

29(35)

28.39(6.33)

Vocational Adjustment1 (Personal emotional)

8

8-40

0.734

24(28)

23.54(4.736)

Five point likert scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Most of the times, Always # Split half reliability
Table 2 Components and reliability of the tool: Nursing aptitude

Subscales

Number of items

Range of scores

Sample

Reliability

Median (Range)

Mean (SD)

Caring

15

15-75

B.Sc. Nursing first year (n=86)

Diploma nursing (n=38)

0.707

0.568

62 (34) 67(41)

61.4 (6.185)

66.53(7.234)

Compassion

18

18-90

Connectedness

22

22-110

0.543

0.594

86(35)

65(44)

84.84(6.933)

64.20(6.834)

Vocational adjustment (Part 1)

17

17-85

0.530

33(25)

32.41(4.976)

Vocational adjustment (Part 2)

9

9-45

Reading comprehension

6

0-6

0.5772

3(6)

2.96(1.605)

Decision making ability

8

0-8

0.0482

3(6)

2.85(1.338)

Mechanical ability

8

0-23

0.2962

12(19)

11.47(4.205)

Arithmetic ability

8

0-8

0.3222

3(8)

2.63(1.6)

Total#

81

81-405

0.846

311(144)

309.29(23.909)

Total##

29

0-29

0.72

20(36)

19.9(6.409)

Five point likert scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Most of the times, Always
Split half reliability
Total scores of Caring, compassion, connectedness and vocational adjustment
Total scores of Reading comprehension, decision making, mechanical and arithmetic ability.
Table 3 Comparison of diploma (n= 36)and B. Sc. Nursing students (n=86) scores

Subscales

t value (df= 120)

P value

Confidence interval

lower

upper

Caring

2.008

0.047

0.035

4.839

Compassion

1.919

0.057

-5.577

0.088

Connectedness

0.263

0.793

-2.391

3.128

Vocational adjustment(Part 1)

1.869

0.064

-5.087

0.146

Vocational adjustment (Part 2)

4.216

0.001

-5.628

-2.031

Reading comprehension

6.403

0.001

-2.327

-1.225

Decision making ability

1.482

0.141

-0.919

0.132

Mechanical ability

6.056

0.001

-5.866

-2.975

Arithmetic ability

0.572

0.568

-0.810

0.447

Total#

1.316

0.191

-15.630

3.149

Total##

6.115

0.001

-8.966

-4.580

Five point likert scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Most of the times, Always
Total scores of Caring, compassion, connectedness and vocational adjustment
Total scores of Reading comprehension, decision making, mechanical and arithmetic ability.
Table 4 Mean standard deviation of scores on nursing aptitude among health care staff

Subscales

Staff nurses (n= 58)

Clerks (n=49)

Respiratory therapy students (n=14)

Health information system students (n=27)

B. Sc. Nursing final year students (n=85)

Diploma nursing final year students (n=48)

Caring

62.16

(5.547)

60.86

(4.912)

59.79

(4.886)

60.52

(4.449)

63.04 (5.81)

62.46

(5.299)

Compassion

66.81

(6.387)

65.08 (6.010)

67.14 (5.057)

66.22 (6.002)

68.28

(5.15)

65.31 (7.6)

Connectedness

90.4

(6.64)

84.78

(6.182)

85.07

(6.367)

87.85 (6.049)

89.44 (5.88)

87.52

(5.231)

Vocational adjustment(Part 1)

64.93

(5.69)

62.16

(7.198)

64.07

(7.385)

65.11 (5.033)

65.69

(5.604)

62.17

(5.737)

Vocational adjustment (Part 2)

29.83 (3.56)

31 (5.091)

26.93 (3.54)

30.3

(3.582)

35.08

(4.124)

29.04

(5.251)

Reading comprehension

3.57

(1.788)

Not assessed

3.36

(1.55)

3.81

(1.495)

4.12

(1.524)

2.33

(1.521)

Decision making ability

3.12

(1.352)

2.79 (0,975)

1.96

(1.675)

3.66

(1.366)

2.29 (1.051)

Mechanical ability

16.05

(4.438)

11.93 (3.97)

7.93 (5.349)

15.94 (4.098)

8.58

(5.287)

Arithmetic ability

3.74

(1.702)

3.5 (1.743)

1.81

(1.841)

3.59

(1.841)

2.5 (1.238)

Total#

314.72

(20.509)

303.88

(22.568)

303 (18.794)

310 (15.214)

321.42

(19.678)

306.5

(21.5)

Total##

26.48

(7.361)

Not applicable

21.57

(5.345)

15.52 (8.045)

27.33 (6.5)

15.71

(5.946)

* Five point likert scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Most of the times, Always

#: Total scores of Caring, compassion, connectedness and vocational adjustment

##: Total scores of Reading comprehension, decision making, mechanical and arithmetic ability.

Table 5 Mean, standard deviation of scores on nursing aptitude of B.Sc. Nursing students

Subscales

1st year (n=86)

2nd year (n=48)

3rd year (n=46)

4th year (n=85)

F Value (df)

P value

Caring

60.67

(6.503)

59.33

(6.409)

58.07

(5.579)

63.07

(5.813)

7.747

(3, 261)

0.001

Compassion

67.38

(7.439)

66.65

(6.466)

63.98

(5.741)

68.18

(5.157)

4.643

(3, 261)

0.004

Connectedness

84.74

(7.346)

85.79

(5.996)

83.43

(5.905)

89.44

(5.883)

11.584

(3, 261)

0.001

Vocational

65.08

64.08

61.74

65.69

4.191

0.006

adjustment(Part 1)

(7.151)

(6.86)

(5.523)

(5.604)

(3,261)

Vocational

33.36

53.5

31.04

35.08

8.664

0.001

adjustment (Part 2)

(4.636)

(4.292)

(4.158)

(4.124)

(3,261)

Reading comprehension

3.5 (1.493)

3.96

(1.798)

3.3 (1.658)

4.12

(1.524)

3.692

(3,261)

0.012

Decision making ability

2.98

(1.447)

3.21

(1.487)

3.28

(1.486)

3.66

(1.368)

3.285

(3, 261)

0.021

Mechanical ability

12.84

(3.564)

13.79

(3.585)

12.2 (4.651)

15.94 (4.098)

12.522

(3, 261)

0.001

Arithmetic ability

2.71

(1.7)

2.42 (1.302)

2.26

(1.512)

3.59

(1.841)

8.906

(3, 261)

0.001

Total#

311.55

(21.844)

309.35

(24.455)

298.26

(19.774)

321.42

(19.678)

10.688

(3, 261)

0.001

Total##

22.02 (5.959)

23.38

(5.491)

21.04

(6.415)

27.33 (6.5)

14.852

(3, 261)

0.001

* Five point likert scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Most of the times, Always.

#: Total scores of Caring, compassion, connectedness and vocational adjustment.

##: Total scores of Reading comprehension, decision making, mechanical and arithmetic ability.

Table 6 Mean, standard deviation of scores on nursing aptitude of diploma students

Subscales

1st year (n=38)

2nd year (n=50)

3rd year (n=48)

F Value(df)

P value

Caring

63.06 (5.099)

63.08

(4.915)

62.46

(5.299)

0.22

(2, 133)

0.801

Compassion

64.61

(6.429)

66.10

(6.606)

65.31

(7.611)

0.509

(2,133)

0.603

Connectedness

85.05

(5.982)

84.96

(6.276)

87.52

(5.231)

2.894

(2,133)

0.059

Vocational adjustment(Part 1)

62.21

(5.648)

65.38

(6.233)

62.17

(5.737)

4.631

(2,133)

0.011**

Vocational adjustment (Part 2)

29.58

(4.589)

30.22

(3.328)

29.04

(5.251)

8.67

(2,133)

0.423

Reading comprehension

1.74

(1.107)

2.38 (0.987)

2.33

(1.521)

3.489

(2,133)

0.033**

Decision making ability

2.55 (1.005)

2.28

(1.278)

2.29 (1.051)

0.767

(2,133)

0.466

Mechanical ability

8.37

(3.921)

9.32

(4.963)

8.58

(5.287)

0.492

(2,133)

0.613

Arithmetic ability

2.45 (1.350)

2.16

(1.267)

2.5 (1.238)

0.983

(2,133)

0.376

Total#

304.5

(18.182)

309.74

(17.975)

306.5

(21.5)

0.831

(2,133)

0.438

Total##

15.11

(4.572)

16.14

(5.675)

15.71

(5.946)

0.383

(2,133)

0.682

* Five point likert scale: Never, Rarely, Occasionally, Most of the times, Always.

** p<0.05

#: Total scores of Caring, compassion, connectedness and vocational adjustment

##: Total scores of Reading comprehension, decision making, mechanical and arithmetic ability.

Acknowledgment

The investigators thank the participants and the validators of the tool. Special thanks to administrative authorities of institutions for permission to conduct the study and for providing the necessary physical environment for administration of the tool.

References

  1. . General Psychology. Fifteenth reprint. 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Testing for nursing aptitude. The Parrot, the yearbook of the Memorial Hospital School of Nursing.
  3. , . Has the UK clinical aptitude test improved medical studentselection? Journal of Medical Education.
  4. , , , . Kozier and Erb's fundamentals of th nursing.
  5. . 1993–95
  6. . Perceptions of health care consumers, deliverers and nurse educators on nurses, nursing practice and nursing education system. 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Aptitude towards nursing among nursing professionals. The Nursing Journal of India. 2004;95((11)):253-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Use of aptitude to understand bachelor of science in nursing student attrition and readiness for the national council licensure examination – registered nurse. Journal of professional nursing. 2009;25((5)):273-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Nursing student math aptitude and success on a medication calculation assessment. Nurse educator. 2009;34((2)):80-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. . Integrating Nursing Quality with Achievement and Aptitude: Towards Assessing Nursing Potential. The International Journal of Research and Review. 2010;4
    [Google Scholar]
  11. . Empirical development of a middle range theory of caring. Nursing research. 1991;40((3)):161-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. . Aptitude test for students seeking admission to nursing institutes. The nursing journal of India. 2011;102((8)):174-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . Choice of nursing career: Pleasure or pressure. International journal of nursing education. 2012;4((1)):42-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist 1973 Jan:1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . Assessing and measuring caring in nursing and health nd sciences.
Show Sections