Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
5 (
3
); 98-104
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703920

Obstructive sleep apnea - a review

Professor & Head, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
Junior Resident, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence S.M. Sharma Professor & Head, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575018, Karnataka, India. Mobile: +91 98453 48515 E-mail: drsharma.sm@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Sleep related problems affect large group of people of all ages around world. One of the most common disorders is Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) characterized by repetitive, complete or partial collapse of upper airway during sleep. Due to complexity of disease and associated medical conditions, a broad spectrum of clinicians play important roles in treatment of OSA. Evaluation of OSA is best performed using a multidisciplinary team approach.

This article aims to review the exhaustive current literature for relevant information regarding terminology, pathophysiology, prevalenceand treatment including conservative and surgical.

Keywords

Obstructive sleep apnea
Epworth sleepiness scale
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy
Polysomnography
Osteotomy
Palatal implants

Introduction

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) was first reported in the medical literature in 1965, although William Osler recognized the stigmata in the early 1900s and named the trait "Pickwickian Syndrome" after a character in a Charles Dickens novel.(l) It is defined as a presence of five or more apneas/hypopneas per hour of sleep with daytime symptoms. It is a common sleep-related breathing disorder of major public health importance(2)

In adults, apnea is defined as cessation of airflow for greater than 10 seconds. Hypopnea is defined as 50% or greater decrease in airflow, often accompanied by hypoxemia or arousal. OSA is also characterized by cessation of respiration during sleep, secondary to obstruction of upper airway(3).

OSA is characterized by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway collapse at the end of expiratory phase during sleep. The collapse is due to reduction in or complete cessation of airflow despite ongoing inspiratory efforts. The events are caused by multiple factors like high intra-luminal pressure, obesity, decreased dilator and increased constrictor activity, low tracheal traction, etc (4).

Review of Literature

Prevalence

It is estimated that the prevalence of OSA in general is 1-6% (5). Community based studies has shown the male to female ratio for OSA is in the range of 2:1 or 3:1 (6). In an epidemiological study by Young et. al., it was estimated that 2% of adult women and 4% of adult men fulfilled diagnostic criteria of OSA i.e. apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 and daytime hypersomnolence (7).

Differences in gender specific OSA prevalence is not uniformly the same across all ages. These differences were not observed in the pediatric and adolescent age groups. Difference in the middle age is attributed to sex hormones which play an important role in the natural history of OSA. (8)Menopause is a risk factor for sleep-disordered breathing while prevalence of OSA in elderly is similar in men and women (9). Finally the influence of other risk factors like alcohol consumption and smoking has been associated with higher prevalence of OSA in men (10).

However, the male predominance reported for OSA in epidemiological studies is more marked in the clinical setting, with estimates male/female ratio as high as 8-10:1 (11).

Pathophysiology

The upper airway is composed of bony structures and soft tissues and it can be divided into 4 sections – nasopharynx (from nasal turbinates to hard palate), velopharynx (from hard palate to tip of uvula), oropharynx (from tip of uvula to tip of epiglottis) and hypopharynx (from tip of epiglottis to level of vocal cords) (12). The most common site of upper airway collapse in OSA is velopharynx. The collapse usually extends to other sites; however, it can also begin at other locations within the upper airway (13).

Upper airway anatomy is an important consideration in understanding the pathophysiology of OSA given the relationship between its structure and function. (12)

Table 1 Factors predisposing to collapse of the upper airway and the development of OSA
  • Restriction in size of bony compartment

    • -

      Mandibular hypoplasia

    • -

      Maxillary hypoplasia

  • Increase in soft tissue volume

    • -

      Deposition of fat around upper airway (e.g., in obesity)

    • -

      Macroglossia

    • -

      Enlargement of soft palate -Thickening of lateral pharyngeal walls

    • -

      Adenotonsillar enlargement

    • -

      Pharyngeal inflammation and edema

  • Increase in pharyngeal compliance

  • Decrease in pharyngeal dilator muscle activity

    • -

      Impairment of mechanoreceptor sensitivity

    • -

      Impairment of upper airway neuromuscular reflexes

    • -

      Impairment of strength & endurance of pharyngeal dilator muscles

  • Decrease in lung volume

  • Instability of ventilatory control » Increase in surface tension

    • -

      Hormonal factors

    • -

      Presence of testosterone (e.g., male gender or testosterone replacement)

    • -

      Absence of progesterone (e.g., menopause)

  • Endocrine disorders (eg, hypothyroidism or acromegaly)

Table 2 Risk Factors
Unmodifiable Potentially modifiable Associated conditions (examples)
Increasing age Obesity Marfan's syndrome
Male gender Neck or visceral fat distribution Hypothyroidism
Ethnicity Upper airway soft tissue abnormalities Down's syndrome
Menopause Craniofacial abnormalities Acromegaly
Genetics Alcohol consumption

Symptoms and Signs

SYMPTOMS SIGNS SYMPTOMS SIGNS
Snoring Obesity Morning headaches Tonsillar hypertrophy
Witnessed Apneas Increased neck circumference Impaired concentration Macroglossia
Excessive daytime sleepiness Increased waist circumference Impaired memory Oropharyngeal narrowing
Nocturnal choking Retrognathia Nocturia Soft palate edema and erythema
Unrefreshed sleep Maxillary constriction Impotence Nasal obstruction
Poor sleep quality Increased overjet Anxiety and depression Hypertension
Insomnia Increased overbite Esophageal reflux

Evaluaution and Diagnosis

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

The ESS developed by Murray Johns at the Epworth Sleep Center, Richmond, Victoria, Australia is an excellent measure of the patient's general level of daytime sleepiness. Patients simply score their likelihood of falling asleep in 8 different situations. (14)

Questionnaire for Epworth Sleepiness Scale (14).
Fig. 1
Questionnaire for Epworth Sleepiness Scale (14).

A large range of pharmacologic approaches to treating OSA have been explored over many years, but these have been shown to be minimally or not at all effective (20).

Non-Surgical

1. Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) –

CPAP therapy for OSA was developed in the early 1980s and subsequently became the initial line of treatment for symptomatic OSA. It still continues to be used as a conservative therapy. (21)

Sleep induces collapse and reduces the diameter of the floppy-toned pharyngeal musculature, as a result of negative transmural pressure. CPAP counteracts this change by pneumatically splinting the upper airway via the application of a positive pressure across the airway walls. This prevents the narrowing (hypopnea) or complete collapse (apnea) ofthe breathingconduitduringsleep.(22)

A diagrammatic representation of a patient receiving CPAP therapy.
Fig. 2
A diagrammatic representation of a patient receiving CPAP therapy.
Table 3 Relative and absolute contraindications to the use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (23)
Clinical situation Rationale for avoiding CPAP
Tracheo-oesophageal fistula Ineffective because of loss of pressure to the gut
Upper airway abnormalities (cleft palate, choanal atresia) Technically difficult/ impossible, often traumatic
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia Leads to intestinal distension and clinical deterioration
Absent/poor respiratory effort Ineffective carbon dioxide removal
Extreme prematurity Lack of reliable evidence in the most preterm infants

1. Oral Appliances

Oral Appliance (OA) therapy for snoring, obstructive sleep apnea or for both is simple and cost-effective. It may be indicated in patients who are unable to tolerate CPAP or poor surgical risks.

Their efficacy is variable and act by a) increase in airway space by stabilizing the mandible in an anterior position, b) advancement of the tongue or soft palate and c) possibly a change in genioglossus muscle activity. The appliances should be used during sleep for life and must be comfortable for the patient (24).

Oral Appliances therapy falls into two main categories: those which hold the tongue forward (24) (Tongue retaining device - TRD) (12) and the ones which reposition the mandible forward (Mandible repositioning appliances - MRA) during sleep (24). MRA's are the most evaluated type of oral appliances (12).

Table 4 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approved Oral Appliances for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (25)
Appliances Manufacturer
Adjustable PM Positioner Jonathan Parker, DDS
Triation (EMA-T)
Elastic Mandibular Advancement Frantz Design, Inc.
Elastomeric Sleep Appliance Village Park Orthodontics
Herbst Orthodontics, SUNY at Buffalo
Equalizer Airway Device Sleep Renewal Inc.
NAPA Great Lakes Orthodontics Ltd.
Klearway Great Lakes Orthodontics Ltd.
OSAP Snorefree, Inc.
PM Positioner Jonathan A Parker, DDS
Sleep-In Bone Screw System .Influence Inc.
Silencer Silent Knights Ventures, Inc
SNOAR Open Airway Appliance Kent J Toone, DDS
Thornton Airway Appliance W. Keith Thornton, DDS

Surgical

A. Non Invasive

1. Injection Snoreplasty -

Soft Palate sclerotherapy (Injection Snoreplasty) is a popular technique as a primary treatment of palatal snoring because of its comparative advantages over other anti-snoring procedures. It is very simple during a routine office visit, minimally painful, is highly effective and is very inexpensive. After topical anesthesia, midline soft palate is injected submucosally with a small amount of sodium tetradecyl sulfate-a well described, safe sclerotherapy agent. Controlled fibrosis eliminates or significantly diminishes palatal flutter snoring (26).

2. Palatal Implants -

Relatively new procedure, the Pillar palatal implant system, consisting of a delivery system and an implant, is designed to reduce airway collapse and obstruction at the level of the soft palate by placement of 3 woven implants. The implants are flexible enough to allow full soft palate function but stiff enough to provide structural support. In addition, the porosity of the implant surface allows tissue ingrowth to anchor the implant, and the surface texture encourages formation of a fibrotic capsule that extends and connects the 3 implants, thereby further stiffening the soft palate. The implant is a segment of braided polyethylene terephthalate 18 mm long and 2 mm in diameter. Polyethylene terephthalate has been widely used in human implants and stimulates a fibrotic response (27).

A. More Invasive

Delivery Tool for the placement of palatal implants.
Fig. 3
Delivery Tool for the placement of palatal implants.

Colin Sullivan, in 1981 showed CPAP as the gold standard in the treatment of OSA. There are only minimal side effects with this mode of treatment.However, despite its high efficacy, patients frequently cannot tolerate its usage every night for life and thus long-term acceptance has been found to be low. (29)

MRDs for OSA patients is considered as another form of noninvasive therapy. A review of the literature showed that these MRDs are more acceptable than CPAP and have reasonable success rates when used in mild-to-moderate OSA.However, the long compliance rates are still not good and there are complications associated with long term usage of the MRDs, such as temporo-mandibular joint problems and changes in the occlusion. (30)

When the non-surgical therapies for OSA fail or are unacceptable to the patients, surgical options are considered. The first surgical treatment for OSA was tracheotomy in 1969 by Kuhol.Previously, in 1964, Ikematsu started treating snoring with a soft palate procedure known as uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP). Following that, Fujita published results on UPPP in OSA.However, Sher's review in 1996 showed the successrate to be close to 40%.Since then, anumber of procedures were developed totreat OSA. They are all designed to improve the posterior airway from the nasal aperture to the larynx. These procedures are shown in Table 5.(31)

Table 5 Range of surgical techniques for OSA in adults (28)
Surgical site E.g. of surgical techniques available Advantages Potential difficulties
Nasal Septoplasty Adjunct for better tolerance of CPAP and lower pressures Septal perforation can adversely affect future CPAP use.
Septorhinoplasty
Turbinate reduction
Endoscopic sinus surgery Improve nasal airway Requires expert assessment of nasal symptoms/examination to identify pathology
Oropharyngeal surgery Tonsillectomy Prevent retropalatal restriction Pain
Uvulo-Palatopharyngoplasty Combined with other procedures in multi-level approach May affect future CPAP tolerance
Laser assisted Uvulo-palatoplasty
Radiofrequency thermo-therapy (Soft palate) Absence of long-term data in OSA.
Hypopharyng-eal surgery Radiofrequency thermotherapy (Tongue base) Combined with other procedures in multilevel approach Absence of long-term data in OSA.
Hyoid suspension
Midline glossectomy Directly deals with anatomical abnormality
Epiglottic wedge resection Morbidity associated includes dysphagia, odynophagia, dysphonia and aspiration. Robotic approach is resource intensive and restricted to specialised centres. May require ‘covering’ tracheostomy in post-op period
Maxillofacial Maxillo-mandibular advancement Highly effective Highly Invasive Need for prolonged fluid diet. Velopharyngeal incompetence.
Tracheal Tracheostomy Bypasses obstructive segment Highly efficient Invasive Technically difficult to perform in obese individuals
Bariatric surgery Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Objective improvement demonstrated-decrease CPAP requirements Maintenance in weight loss required for benefits
Vertical banded gastroplasty Further health benefits May not be deemed curative

Most of the soft-tissue procedures only augment one part of the posterior airway and thus were limited in their success rate when used individually. Derived from Moore's concept,two principles of therapy were developed.The first principle states that the entire upper airway is affected, especially in moderate and severe OSA. The second principle states that the more severe the disorder, the more aggressive the surgical therapy has to be to achieve success. Modern surgical reasoning suggests that severe OSA affects the entire airway and that multilevel procedures are necessary to achieve good results. Riley et al found the success rate for UPPP, genioglossusadvancement (GGA), and hyoid suspension(HS) to be 61% and Friedman, et alachieved a 41% success for UPPP. (31)

Hard tissue surgical procedures have shown better success rates but are more tedious and may have higher morbidity. Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) which is modeled after conventional orthognathic surgery has achieved remarkable success rates of 97- 100%.Therefore, it is important to examine the patients carefully before deciding on the most appropriate surgical procedures. (32)

Fig. 4 Positioning of various OSA treatment classes in a matrix comparing efficacy and acceptability of treatments. (33)

A diagrammatic representation showing typical osteotomy cuts with fixation by mini plates after Maxillo-mandibular advancement.
Fig. 4
A diagrammatic representation showing typical osteotomy cuts with fixation by mini plates after Maxillo-mandibular advancement.

Conclusion

Obstructive Sleep Apnea is a relatively common condition that predisposes the patient to physical harm, significant social discord and poor quality of life. Conservative and surgical techniques are components of multimodal algorithm of OSA which focuses on modifying skeletal or soft tissue anomaly. It is important to understand intended goal of procedure, some procedures have been shown to independently improve the quality of life as well as acceptance of therapy. Emphasis on modifying the treatment procedure is key factor to achieve best and long term effects .Team effort and collaborated approach gives the optimal result for patient.

References

  1. , , . Current Therapy in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. .
  2. , . Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Lancet. 2002;360:237-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . Obstructive sleep apnea in adults: epidemiology, clinical presentation and treatment options. Adv Cardiol. 2011;46:1-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . Physiology of Breathing During Sleep. Basel: Karger; . p. :21-28.
  5. , , , . Prevalence of sleep apnoea syndrome in the Spanish adult population. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:381-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . Analytic epidemiology studies of sleep-disordered breathing: what explains the gender difference in sleep disordered breathing? Sleep. 1993;16:S1-2.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . The occurrence of sleep disordered-breathing among middle aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1230-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Sleep- related breathing disorders in adolescents aged 12 to 16 years. Clinical and polygraphic findings. Chest. 2001;119:1393-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Morbidity, mortality and sleep- disordered breathing in a community dwelling elderly. Sleep. 1996;19:277-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea. A population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:277-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Gender differences in sleep-disordered breathing in a community based sample. Am J Crit Care Med. 1994;149:722-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Sleep Medicine for Dentists:A Practical Overview. Canada: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc; .
  13. , . Pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:2440.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. . Reliability and factor analysis of the of the Epworth Sleepinss Scale. Sleep. 1992;15(4):376-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. . A new method for measuring daytime symptoms: The epworth sleepinss scale. Sleep. ;14(6):540-545.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendations for syndrome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. The report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. Sleep. 1999;22(5):667-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications. Westchester (IL): American Academy of Sleep Medicine;
  18. , , , , , . Medical therapy for obstructive sleep apnea. A review by the Medical Therapy For Obstructive Sleep Apnea Task Force of the Standards of Practice Committee of the American Academy. of Sleep Medicine. Sleep. 2006;29:1036-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Positional treatment vs continuous positive airway pressure in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Chest. 1999;115:771-781.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Neuropharmacology of obstructive sleep apnea. In: , , eds. Clinical Pharmacology of Sleep. Basel,Switzerland: Birkhauser; . p. :21-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Reversal of obstructive sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure applied through the nares. Lancet. 1981;1(8225):862-865.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Pathogenesis of upper airway occlusion during sleep. J Appl Physiol. 1978;44:931-938.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . The rational use of nasal continuous positive airway. Current Paediatrics. 2003;13:190-195.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Oral appliances for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep. 2006;29(2):244-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Petersons Principles of of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2nd). Ontario: BC Decker Inc; .
  26. , . Operative techniques in Otolaryngology. Head and Neck Surgery. 2002;13(3):185-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . One-year results: Palatal implants for the treatment. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2007;136:818-822.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Role of surgery in adult obstructive sleep apnoea. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2014;18(5):405-413.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Objective measurement of patterns of nasal CPAP use by patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147:887-895.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. . Review of oral appliances for treatment of sleep- disordered breathing. Sleep Breath. 2007;11:1-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Semin Orthod. 2009;15:94-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. . Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in a site-specific treatment approach for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:1256-1261.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , . Medical devices for the diagnosis and management of obstructive sleep apnea. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:749-763.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections