Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JHS-2024-9-27-R1-(1589)

Optimising Labour Outcomes: The Impact of the Semi-Fowler’s Position on Labour Duration and Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Primigravida Mothers

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Parul University, Post Limda, Waghodia, Gujarat, India
Faculty of Medicine, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

* Corresponding author: Neha N Parmar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Parul University, Post Limda, Waghodia, Gujarat, India. gops05@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Parmar NN, Gohil JT. Optimising Labour Outcomes: The Impact of the Semi-Fowler’s Position on Labour Duration and Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Primigravida Mothers. J Health Allied Sci NU. doi: 10.25259/JHS-2024-9-27-R1-(1589)

Abstract

Objectives

Maternal positioning during labour can significantly affect the birthing process and outcomes. The semi-Fowler’s position, in particular, is favoured for its comfort and its potential to reduce interventions. This study assesses maternal and neonatal outcomes following Semi Fowler’s positioning and identifies associations between demographic variables and labour outcomes.

Material and Methods

A Quasi- experimental was employed with 100 primigravida mothers in hospitals of Kheda-Anand district, Gujarat, India. Data were collected using a demographic interview schedule, the WHO (World Health Organization) partograph, and APGAR (activity, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration) scores. Participants were encouraged to maintain the semi-Fowler’s position for 20 minutes at a time, repeated six times until full cervical dilation. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, t tests.

Results

The semi-Fowler’s position significantly reduced the duration of the first stage of labour (P = 0.031), improved cervical dilation rates, and increased the intensity of uterine contractions. Significant associations were observed between food patterns, gestational age, BMI, and labour outcomes (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The semi-Fowler’s position substantially improves labour outcomes in primigravida mothers, reducing labour duration and enhancing cervical dilation and contractions.

Keywords

Birth outcomes
Labour positioning
Maternal health indicators
Postural influence on labour
Primigravida mothers

INTRODUCTION

Labour is a natural process, yet it is intricate, involving numerous physiological and psychological variables. The care provided during childbirth can significantly impact women both physically and emotionally.[1]

The childbirth experience is an intensely dynamic, physical, and emotional event with lifelong implications. Women who are provided with continuously available support during labour have improved outcomes compared with women who do not have one‐to‐one, continuously available support.[2] Effective management of labour is crucial, as it is one of the most common medical challenges for healthcare providers. Proper management is closely linked to the normal progression of labour. Mismanagement can result in prolonged or obstructed labour, leading to issues such as maternal exhaustion, uterine rupture, postpartum bleeding, and infection. Therefore, early detection and prevention of deviations from normal labour are essential to reduce the incidence of complications.[2,3]

Maternity care provider clinicians have been aware for many decades that the maternal supine position and pregnancy are not a good mix. This is probably because when the woman lies on her back, the gravid uterus is known to compress the inferior vena cava.[4] This can result in a range of negative sequelae, such as maternal hypotension and reduced blood flow to the foetus.[5] The supine position may be disadvantageous for foetal wellbeing and in compromised pregnancies may be a sufficient stressor to contribute to foetal demise.’ This fits well with the triple risk model for stillbirth; these results certainly support the findings from earlier epidemiological studies, that supine sleep in pregnancy increases the risk of stillbirth, particularly in the growth‐restricted foetus.[6]

In the context of childbirth, the semi-Fowler’s position is a beneficial posture where a woman’s back is inclined at a 45° angle from the horizontal plane, resembling a modified sitting position. This positioning is advantageous as it enhances the expulsive force, directing it towards the pelvis and leveraging the effect of gravity. Additionally, this posture is conducive to modern obstetric care, providing comfort and ease of access for healthcare providers.[7]

Conversely, the lithotomy position, despite its widespread use among care providers, has been associated with several risks. Research suggests that this position not only increases the likelihood of perineal lacerations but also elevates the risk of lumbosacral spine and lower extremity nerve injuries. These findings underscore the importance of considering alternative positions, like the semi-Fowler’s, to mitigate such risks and improve overall birthing experiences.[7]

Semi Fowler’s position during labour and birth can increase the available space within the pelvis by 28-30%, giving more room to the baby for rotation & descent. There is also a 54% decreased incidence of foetal heart rate abnormalities when the mother is upright.[6] Semi Fowler’s position decreases the need for epidural analgesia and reduces the risk for emergency caesarean section by 29%.[8]

The body of evidence supporting the benefits of the semi-Fowler’s position during labour is substantial. In light of this evidence, the present study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the semi-Fowler’s position on selected maternal and neonatal outcomes among Primigravida mothers and to find out the association between selected demographic variables with labour outcomes in the semi-Fowler’s group. From shortening the duration of labour to enhancing foetal well-being and reducing the likelihood of surgical interventions, the semi-Fowler’s position offers multiple advantages that contribute to improved outcomes for both mother and child. As maternity care practices continue to advance, the integration of evidence-based positioning strategies such as the semi-Fowler’s position should be prioritised by healthcare providers aiming to enhance the birthing experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study employed a quantitative research approach, specifically utilising a quasi-experimental design. This design was chosen to evaluate the effects of the semi-Fowler’s position on labour outcomes among primigravida mothers. The target population for this study comprised primigravida mothers recruited from four hospitals within the Kheda-Anand district of Gujarat. These hospitals were selected through convenience sampling based on their geographical proximity and feasibility for data collection. The sample size was determined using power analysis to achieve 80% power with a significance level (alpha) of 0.05. Based on the calculation, 91 participants were required. To account for an expected dropout rate of 10%, the study included a total of 100 participants. Participants were selected using an enumerative sampling technique to ensure unbiased and representative samples. The study was carried out over a period from December 2021 to November 2022.

Inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: 1) primigravida mothers (first pregnancy); 2) single foetus with cephalic presentation; 3) gestational age between 35 to 40 weeks; 4) cervical dilation between 3 to 5 cm; 5) no known pregnancy complications or risk factors; 6) willingness to adopt the semi-Fowler’s position during the first stage of labour; and 7) Undergoing spontaneous vaginal delivery at term. Exclusion criteria included: 1) multiparous mothers; 2) multiple gestations; 3) high-risk conditions such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, precipitate labour, placenta previa, or known fetal anomalies; 4) induced or augmented labour; 5) caesarean deliveries (elective or emergency); 6) any condition limiting the ability to maintain the Semi-Fowler’s position; and 7) non-consent or withdrawal from the study. In the semi-Fowler’s group, participants received positioning interventions after informed consent and collection of personal data, which occurred before full cervical dilation. The intervention began when the mother reached 3-5 cm of cervical dilation, with the semi-Fowler’s position introduced at the initiation of the first stage of labour till the full cervical dilation (10 cm).

During the intervention, primigravida mothers were encouraged to maintain the semi-sitting position for 20 minutes, followed by a 10-minute rest in the left lateral position. This cycle was repeated six times until full cervical dilation was achieved. Once full dilation was confirmed, the mother was shifted to the labour bed. Uterine contractions were assessed using abdominal palpation by evaluating the hardness of the fundal area during contractions. Additionally, the intensity was assessed based on the mother’s subjective experience of pain and pressure. Both findings were systematically recorded using the WHO Partograph. Labor progression was monitored using observation methods, and cervical dilation was evaluated by the obstetrician through per vaginal (PV) examinations every 6 hours. The status of the rupture of membranes, whether spontaneous or artificial, was also observed and recorded. All findings were documented using a modified WHO Partograph. For neonatal outcomes, the Apgar score was checked at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth in collaboration with the paediatrician and staff nurse. Additionally, the newborn’s weight was recorded, and any need for assistance, such as NICU admission, was evaluated. Post-test evaluations were conducted during the labour process and after delivery to measure both maternal and neonatal outcomes. The maternal outcomes assessed were duration of all three stages of labour, cervical dilation, intensity of uterine contractions, and rupture of membranes; while neonatal outcomes included APGAR score, birth weight, and the need for resuscitation or NICU admission. The findings demonstrated that the semi-Fowler’s position was effective in significantly improving maternal outcomes, with a marked reduction in labour duration across all stages (1.27 hours in the first, 1.88 hours in the second, and 2.05 hours in the third), along with enhanced cervical dilation and stronger uterine contractions. Although a few preterm deliveries were observed in late 36 weeks, all neonatal outcomes remained within healthy parameters, with no adverse effects, further supporting the safety and benefit of the semi-Fowler’s position during labour.

Ethical considerations

The study received approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (Approval No. EC/767/2021) on November 23, 2021. All participants were informed about the study’s objectives and the interventions used. Initially, coding was performed, and informed consent was obtained from each participant. Participants were assured of confidentiality and were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time during data collection.

Data analysis

The data were analysed using IBM SPSS software, version 20.0 for Windows 10. Descriptive statistics included frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. For inferential analysis, a one-sample t-test was applied to continuous variables, while the Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and to determine the association of labour outcomes with demographic variables. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Frequency and percentage distribution of demographic variables of primigravida mothers

In the semi-Fowler’s group, the majority of Primigravida mothers (41%) were aged 18–21 years, followed by 33% in the 22-25 age group, 24% in the 26–29 age group, and 2% aged 30 years or older. Most had secondary education (42%), with others being graduates (28%), having primary education (25%), postgraduates (2%), or no formal education (3%). A large proportion were housewives (60%), while 25% were in private employment, 14% in labour work, and 1% in government service. The majority were Hindu (75%), followed by Muslim (18%) and Christian (7%). Most resided in rural areas (59%), with 38% in urban areas and 3% in slum areas. Joint families were the most common living arrangement (63%), followed by nuclear (32%) and extended families (5%). Dietary habits showed that 57% followed a vegetarian diet and 43% a mixed diet. Regular exercise during pregnancy was reported by 44% of participants. Nurses assisted 76% of mothers during labour, while only 6% reported using complementary alternative medicine. All mothers experienced a spontaneous onset of labour.

Frequency and percentage distribution of clinical variables of primigravida mothers

Clinically, the majority had a normal BMI (18.5-24.9) (78%), while 15% were overweight, 6% obese, and 1% extremely obese. Most mothers (57%) delivered at 37–38 weeks of gestation, with others delivering at 39-40 weeks (29%), 35-36 weeks (9%), or 40-41 weeks (5%). At admission, most were in the active phase of cervical dilation (57%). Most newborns (59%) weighed 2.6-3.0 kg, followed by 24% with 3.1-3.5 kg, 16% with 2.1-2.5 kg, and 1% with 3.6-4.0 kg, reflecting a generally healthy birth weight distribution with some variations requiring monitoring.

Analysis of labour outcomes among primigravida mothers in semi-Fowler’s position

Table 1 summarises the duration of labour. The mean durations for the first, second, third, and total stages of labour were 1.27 hours, 1.88 hours, 2.05 hours, and 1.48 hours, respectively, all showing statistically significant reductions (p < 0.0001). Rate of cervical dilation: a significant increase in cervical dilation rate was observed (Mean: 2.01 cm/hour, p < 0.0001). Intensity of uterine contractions: the mean intensity was 0.57, with a significant t-test value (p < 0.0001), indicating improved contraction strength. Rupture of membranes: the timing and nature of membrane rupture showed significant associations (Mean: 1.49, p < 0.0001). Mode of delivery: the intervention significantly influenced the mode of delivery (Mean: 1.88, p < 0.0001).

Table 1: Effectiveness of semi-Fowler’s position on maternal outcome in primigravida mothers (N = 100)
Maternal parameters Mean Std. deviation t-test (cv) p values (TV) Significant/Non-significant
Duration of labour/hr- first stage 1.27 0.468 27.13 <0.0001 Significant
Duration of labour/hr – second stage 1.88 0.573 32.809 <0.0001 Significant
Duration of labour/hr - third stage 2.05 0.575 35.47 <0.0001 Significant
Duration of labour/hr - Total 1.48 0.522 28.35 <0.0001 Significant
Rate of cervical dilatation 2.01 0.628 16.08 <0.0001 Significant
Intensity of uterine contractions 0.57 0.495 8.68 <0.0001 Significant
Rupture of the membrane 1.49 0.502 9.76 <0.0001 Significant
Mode of delivery 1.88 0.608 14.47 <0.0001 Significant

p < 0.0001 is considered highly statistically significant. N represents number of participants.

The semi-Fowler’s position significantly improved maternal outcomes, including reduced labour duration, enhanced uterine efficiency, and favourable delivery outcomes. This position is recommended as an effective strategy to optimise labour progression and maternal comfort.

Analysis of neonatal outcome among primigravida mothers in semi-Fowler’s position

Table 2 represents APGAR scores at both 1 minute (6.62) and 5 minutes (8.23), which were significantly higher, with p-values of <0.0001 for both, indicating a statistically significant improvement in neonatal health following the intervention. The t-test values (56.59 for 1 minute and 62.70 for 5 minutes) further confirm the significant difference, suggesting that the intervention positively impacted neonatal outcomes. These results highlight that the intervention contributed to better neonatal well-being, as reflected in the improved APGAR scores shortly after birth.

Table 2: Effectiveness of semi-Fowlers position on neonatal outcome in primigravida mothers (N = 100)
Neonatal parameter Mean Std. deviation t- test (calculated value) p values (tabulated value) Significant/Non-significant
APGAR score - 1 min 6.62 .993 56.59 <0.0001 Significant
APGAR score - 5 min 8.23 1.153 62.70 <0.0001 Significant

p < 0.0001 is considered highly statistically significant. N represents number of participants APGAR: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration.

Analogy of the normal range of parameters with maternal/foetal outcome

Table 3 summarises the impact of labour parameters on maternal and neonatal outcomes. For the first stage of labour, 54% of women had durations within the normal 8-12 hours range, and 52% had a second stage duration of 1 hour, both showing improved outcomes. The third stage was within the 10-15 minutes norm for 84% of participants, and the total labour duration was within the 12-16 hours range for 46%, indicating enhanced results.

Table 3: Analogy of normal range of parameters with maternal/foetal outcome (N=100)
Parameters Normal range during labour Maternal/Neonatal outcome n (%) Remarks
Duration of labour/hr - first stage 8-12 hours 54% Improved
Duration of labour/hr - second stage 1 hour 52% Improved
Duration of labour/hr - third stage 10-15 minutes 84% Improved
Duration of labour/hr - Total 12-16 46% Enhanced
Rate of cervical dilatation 1cm/hour 66% Enhanced
Intensity of uterine contractions Severe 14% Impaired
Rupture of the membrane Spontaneous 51% Enhanced
Mode of delivery Normal vaginal delivery 100% Enhanced
Neonatal outcome
APGAR score - 1 min 7-10 (excellent condition) 50% Improved
APGAR score - 5 min 7-10 (excellent condition) 96% Enhanced

N represents number of participants. APGAR: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration.

The cervical dilatation rate met the 1 cm/hour standard for 66% of women. Severe uterine contractions were reported in only 14% of cases, suggesting fewer complications. Spontaneous rupture of membranes occurred in 51% of women, and all participants had normal vaginal deliveries.

For neonatal outcomes, 50% of newborns had an APGAR score of 7-10 at 1 minute, with 96% scoring in the same range at 5 minutes, reflecting improved and enhanced conditions.

Supplementary Table S1 presents the association of selected demographic variables with labor outcomes. In the semi-Fowler’s group, food pattern and gestational age (in weeks) showed a significant association with the intensity of uterine contractions. Gestational age was also significantly associated with rupture of membranes. Furthermore, the presence of a support person during labor and the mother’s BMI demonstrated significant associations with the mode of delivery (p ≤ 0.05).

Supplementary Table S1

DISCUSSION

The findings demonstrated a significant impact of this position in shortening the duration of the first, second, and third stages of labour. Several studies have corroborated these results, indicating that the semi-Fowler’s position is associated with a reduced duration of labour in the second and third stages.[9,10] Additionally, the study findings revealed that the semi-Fowler’s position significantly improved labour outcomes, with shorter second-stage duration (t=13.03, p<0.05), stronger and longer uterine contractions, and higher mean fetal heart rates at multiple observation points compared to the control group.[11] Most women (73.3%) had 2–4 contractions within 10 minutes, and the majority (93.3%) achieved normal vaginal delivery with 10episiotomy. Neonatal outcomes remained optimal, with all foetal heart rate (FHR) values within the normal range.[12] These findings align with earlier research showing that supported semi-sitting positions enhance labour efficiency and maternal comfort. For instance, one study reported a higher rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery (83.3% vs. 46.7%, p=0.001), less pain (p=0.004), and shorter second-stage duration in the semi-sitting group[13]. Another trial demonstrated significantly shorter second-stage labour (t=5.87, p<0.001) and higher neonatal APGAR scores in the intervention group. Together, the evidence reinforces the semi-Fowler’s position as a safe, effective, and well-tolerated posture for optimising maternal and neonatal outcomes.[14]

The present study found that the semi-Fowler’s position significantly improved labour outcomes, reducing the mean durations of the first, second, third, and total stages of labour (1.27, 1.88, 2.05, and 1.48 hours, respectively; p < 0.0001). It also increased the rate of cervical dilation (2.01 cm/hour) and the intensity of uterine contractions and positively influenced membrane rupture timing and mode of delivery (all p < 0.0001). Neonatal outcomes were favorable, with APGAR scores >7, normal birth weights, and no NICU admissions, even in 9 preterm deliveries (∼36 weeks). These results highlight the semi-Fowler’s position as a safe, simple, and effective intervention yet impactful modification to routine labour management that shortens labour, enhances maternal comfort, and supports positive birth outcomes.

Limitations of this study include several factors that may affect the interpretation of the results. The intervention was primarily carried out by one researcher with the assistance of other nurses, potentially introducing variability and affecting the consistency of the results. Participants also assumed the semi-Fowler’s position based on individual comfort levels and required rest periods between contractions, which may have influenced the uniformity of the intervention. Additionally, the study was confined to hospitals within the Kheda-Anand district of Gujarat, India, limiting the generalisability of the findings to other regions or populations. Finally, the sample size was restricted to 100 participants, which may impact the statistical power and robustness of the study’s outcomes. The intervention was not compared with a standard procedure, which affects the ability to evaluate its relative efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Positioning primigravida women in the semi-Fowler’s position has demonstrated significant benefits, including shorter labour duration, improved cervical dilation, and stronger uterine contractions, thereby enhancing maternal comfort and satisfaction. Incorporating this position into routine nursing care can optimise labour outcomes and reduce complications, making it a valuable alternative to the traditional supine position. Overall, the semi-Fowler’s position holds strong potential as a standard practice in maternity care, warranting continued research and promotion to further improve maternal and neonatal well-being.

Acknowledgment

We sincerely thank the doctors of the selected hospitals for granting permission for data collection. We also extend our heartfelt gratitude to the hospital teams working in the antenatal wards and labour rooms for their unwavering support and dedication. We are deeply grateful to our guide for their invaluable guidance and insights throughout this study. Additionally, we appreciate the support and assistance provided by the students involved in this research.

Ethical approval

The research/study approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee at Muljibhai Patel Society for Research in Nephro-Urology, number EC/767/2021, dated 23rd November 2021.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate participants consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , . A narrative review of maternal physical activity during labour and its effects upon length of first stage. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013;19:44-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD003766.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Perinatal nursing (4th edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins; . p. :343-98.
  4. , , , , . The effect of supine positioning on maternal hemodynamics during late pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:3923-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. . The supine hypotensive syndrome. Anaesthesia. 1960;15:298-306.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anesthesia. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2017;5:CD002006.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Back to basics: avoiding the supine position in pregnancy. J Physiol. 2017;595:1017-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013:CD003934.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Timing of maternal mortality and severe morbidity during the postpartum period: a systematic review. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20:2119-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ganpathy T. Childbirth in supported sitting maternal position. Available from: https://www.scribd.com/document/272753209/Childbirth-in-Supported-Sitting-Maternal-Position. [Last accessed 2025 September 20].
  11. , . Effectiveness of semi-fowler’s position on maternal parameters and fetal heart rate in Primigravida women during second stage of labour. Int J Health Sci Res. 2015;5:283-289.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Effectiveness of semi-fowler’s position on outcome of labour during second stage among primigravida women. Int J Manag Soc Sci. 2023;11:50-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Comparison of effectiveness between supported sitting and conventional lithotomy position. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2021;11:181-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Effect of supported sitting position during second stage of labor on its outcome in primigravidae: A quasi-experimental study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023;12:2014-2019.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections