Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
15 (
4
); 521-527
doi:
10.25259/JHS-2024-6-22-(1445)

Perceived Body Image and Anthropometry Among Students

Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Department of Community Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care, Federal Medical Centre Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
Department of Research, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Department of Internal Medicine, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital Irrua, Edo State, Nigeria
Department of Internal Medicine, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria
Department of Family Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria

*Corresponding author: Dr. Oladimeji Adebayo, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria. doctorladi@yahoo.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Adebayo O, Ojo OF, Ayowole D, Kanmodi KK, Oiwoh SO, Inofomoh FO, et al. Perceived Body Image and Anthropometry Among Students. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2025;15:521-7. doi: 10.25259/JHS-2024-6-22-(1445)

Abstract

Objectives

Body image dissatisfaction and anthropometry-related issues are a growing public health concern in Nigeria, particularly among young adults. Tertiary students, including those in Nigerian university campuses, may be susceptible to sociocultural influences that promote unrealistic body ideals. This study investigates the relationship between perceived body size and anthropometric measurements among this population.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 232 female university students in a selected tertiary educational institution in Ibadan, southwestern Nigeria. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and the Silhouette Rating Scale (SRS) to assess their perceived body size. Height and weight were measured to calculate the Body Mass Index (BMI). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise demographics and body image scores. Correlations were conducted to examine the relationship between perceived body size, anthropometry, and gender. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.

Results

The average age of the participants was 21.4 years. The participants reported a significant discrepancy between their perceived and actual body size. Most of them (65%) overestimated their body size, regardless of gender or BMI category. Correlations revealed a negative association between perceived body size and BMI, indicating that participants with higher BMI tended to perceive themselves as larger in body size.

Conclusion

This study found a significant body image discrepancy among Nigerian university students. Despite variations in BMI, a substantial portion of the sample overestimated their body size. These findings highlight the need for culturally sensitive interventions to promote healthy body image and aid effective anthropometry interventions among young adults.

Keywords

Anthropometry
Body image
Nigeria
Silhouette rating scale
University students

INTRODUCTION

Body image (BI) is a multidimensional construct comprising various dimensions, such as perceptual, affective, behavioural, and social validation through the opinions of others.[1,2] The quantity and quality of acceptance or rejection of external feedback may influence self-perception and evaluation.[1] Throughout their tertiary education, students encounter a range of social and academic pressures that have the potential to impact their perception of their physical appearance.

Furthermore, there is an increased burden of weight- or anthropometry-related issues among young people globally, including in Nigeria.[3] The perception of body image influences the accurate acceptance of their true anthropometry status. Negative attitudes towards one’s own body predispose one to a wide array of psychological and health issues.[4] Interestingly, studies have reported that the perception of actual body dimensions plays an important role in initiating weight-related behaviours.[4]

There is also the impact of body image and actual weight distortion. Previous studies have noted body image distortion as a form of distress connected to one’s own body. Body dissatisfaction is characterised by a perceptually distorted image of one’s shape or size and a distinct feeling of discomfort.[5] On the other hand, problems associated with weight-related issues, particularly being overweight and obese, are well-established and documented. They include type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, sleep disorders, and certain types of cancer.[5]

Gaining insight into students’ perceptions of their bodies is essential for fostering a positive body image. There is a paucity of studies that test the relationship between the figure rating scale and actual body anthropometry in the black African population.

We determined how perceived body image is related to current body size & body ideal, and related it to self-reported and actual anthropometry among tertiary students from Southwestern Nigeria using the Silhouettes Rating Scale.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design

A cross-sectional study design was used in the collection of data from participants under ThE profile of anthRopometRy And psyChosocial issuEs on campus (TERRACE) study.[6-8] A study protocol had previously been published.[7] The article was reported based on the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology(STROBE) Statement—checklist of items.[9]

Study setting

The study included five tertiary institutions in Ibadan, the capital of Oyo State in southwest Nigeria. These institutions were selected based on a multistage sampling described in previous publications.[6,7] Students were recruited from the College of Nursing and Midwifery (CNM), Federal School of Statistics (FSS), Kola Daisi University (KU), Oyo State College of Health Science and Technology (OYSCHST), and The Polytechnic (TP) between February 2021 and September 2021.[6,7]

Participants/sampling technique/data collection

Those recruited were eligible and consenting adults between 16–35 years of age. To ensure proportionality and sufficient representation of all categories of tertiary institutions in Ibadan, the study aimed to select a minimum of two institutions from each type of institution, namely universities, polytechnics, and monotechnics. Two universities were selected at random from a pool of five universities in Ibadan using a raffle draw. Two polytechnics out of the four in Ibadan were selected at random using a raffle draw. Three monotechnics were chosen from a pool of ten in Ibadan, using a random selection process known as the raffle draw. However, a total of five tertiary institutions were included because institutional approvals from school management were not obtained for a university and a polytechnic during the study period, despite approval from the ethical review board being available.

In each selected school, academic departments from the tertiary institutions were randomly selected. A random raffle draw was used to select two academic departments from each of the participating universities, while three and two academic departments/units/divisions were chosen from the polytechnics and monotechniques, respectively. A total of twenty-five students from each chosen academic department were recruited for the study through a random selection process using a table of random numbers.

The administration of the questionnaire was done by trained research assistants. All questionnaires were interviewer-administered.

Variables

Sociodemographic information, such as age (continuous variable in years), sex (male or female), and marital status (yes or no), was collected. Anthropometry-related questions were asked: (i) Self-reported weight in kilograms (Kg), (ii) Weight check in the last six months (yes or no).

Anthropometry

Objective physical characteristics were measured using standardised protocols. Common anthropometric measurements included (i) height, (ii) weight, (iii) waist circumference, (iv) hip circumference, (v) body mass index (BMI), and (vii) perceived body image.

  • i.

    Height: This measurement was recorded to the nearest 0.1 m with a stadiometer, with the participant standing erect.[7]

  • ii.

    Weight: This was measured using a weighing scale and rounded to the nearest 0.1 Kg.[7]

  • iii.

    Waist circumference: A non-stretchable but flexible measuring tape was placed in a horizontal plane around the abdomen at the level of the iliac crest.

  • iv.

    BMI (kg/m2) was categorised using the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions: (i) Normal BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 (ii) Overweight: 25-29.9 kg/m2 (iii) Obesity: ≥30 kg/m2, Obesity was further sub classified into class 1 (30-34.9 kg/m2), class 2 (35-39.9 kg/m2), and class 3 (≥40 kg/m2).

Perceived body image

The two silhouettes from the Silhouette Rating Scale with varying body dimensions (width of body parts) and shapes (the 1st is the thinnest and the 9th is the largest), were given to the participants. Participants selected silhouettes that represented their current and ideal body sizes.[2,10] The scale included two different instructions: the first was: “Please, observe the nine figures and select the one that you perceive as most accurately depicting your current body size?”. The image was ranked with (BMI in Kg/m2): 9 (21.5 ± 1), 8(20.3 ± 2), 7 (26.0 ± 3), 6(31.0 ± 4), 5(35.4 ± 8), 4(31.8 ± 2), 3(37.2 ± 10), 2(42.0 ± 4), and 1(44.3 ± 4). While the second one asked: “Please, observe the nine figures and select the one that you perceive as most accurately depicting how you would like to be?”. The image was ranked with (BMI in Kg/m2): 9 (21.5 ± 1), 8(20.3 ± 2), 7 (26.0 ± 3), 6(31.0 ±4), 5(35.4 ± 8), 4(31.8 ± 2), 3(37.2 ± 10), 2(42.0 ± 4), and 1(44.3 ± 4).[1,2,6]

Data analysis

Data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the anthropometric data and body image scores. Bivariate correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between anthropometric measurements and body image scores. Size of correlation were determined using 0.90 to 1.00 (-0.90 to -1.00) as very high positive (negative) correlation, 0.70 to 0.90(-0.70 to -0.90) as high positive(negative) correlation, 0.50 to 0.70(-0.50 to -0.70) as moderate positive(negative) correlation, 0.30 to 0.50(-0.30 to -0.50) as low positive(negative) correlation, and 0.00 to 0.30(-0.00 to -0.30) as negligible correlation. Regression analysis was used to investigate how anthropometric factors predict variations in perceived body image. Statistical significance was set at 0.05.

Ethical considerations

Approval for ethical clearance was obtained from the Oyo State Ministry of Health’s Health Research Ethics Review Committee, Ibadan, Oyo State, as the study institution was located within this body’s jurisdiction (NHREC) (AD 13/479/1776B). The study team obtained permission from the heads of the included institutions prior to recruiting eligible students and conducting the study. Prior to collecting data, written informed consent was obtained from the eligible students. The participants’ identities were not included in the instrument, and their personal information identifiers were not stored in a password-protected computer to guarantee confidentiality. The password was only accessible to the investigators and data clerks.

RESULTS

The average age of this study population was 21.4 years, and most were unmarried [Table 1]. Two out of five reported getting their weight checked in the last six months. Self-reported weight was slightly higher than measured weight. None considered themselves obese, while a body mass index (BMI) assessment revealed that one out of 20 individuals was obese.

Table 1: Table showing basic profile and anthropometry-related parameters of the participants
Basic profile N=232
Age in years (mean ± SD) 21.4 ± 3.8
Married, n(%)
 Yes 18(7.8)
 No 214(92.2)
Anthropometry-related variables, mean ± SD
Self-reported weight (Kg) 60.1 ± 9.6
Weight check in the last six months, n(%)
 Yes 95(40.9)
 No 137(59.1)
Self-perception of weight, n(%)
 Underweight 6(2.6)
 Normal 161(69.4)
 Overweight 5(2.2)
 Don’t know 40(17.2)
Obesity by BMI, n(%)
 Yes 10(4.3)
 No 222(95.7)
Classification of BMI, n(%)
 Underweight 58(25.0)
 Normal 139(59.9)
 Overweight 25(10.8)
 Obese 10(4.3)
Measured anthropometry, mean ± SD
 Weight (Kg) 56.2 ± 11.2
 Height (m) 1.61 ± 0.71
 Waist circumference (cm), mean ± SD 75.1 ± 9.3
 Hip circumference (cm), mean ± SD 89.3 ± 8.7
 Waist: Height ratio, mean ± SD 0.5 ± 0.1
 Waist: Hip ratio, mean ± SD 0.8 ± 0.6
 Body mass index (Kg/m2), mean ± SD 21.2 ± 4.0

BMI: Body mass index, SD: Standard deviation.

When asked which figure fits their weight best and which one they consider ideal, most clustered between 5-9 ratings [Figure 1], using the Silhouettes Rating Scale.

Distribution of silhouettes rating scale assessment among participants.
Figure 1:
Distribution of silhouettes rating scale assessment among participants.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of BMI assessment amongst the participants. Those underweight, overweight, and obese (class I) were 24.6%, 4.9%, and 0.8%, respectively.

Figure showing the classification of BMI among the participants. BMI: Body mass index.
Figure 2:
Figure showing the classification of BMI among the participants. BMI: Body mass index.

Table 2 showed that there were strong positive correlations between waist-to-height ratio, waist-to-hip ratio, waist circumference, self-reported weight, and BMI, while those for body image perception were generally negative and weaker.

Table 2: Correlations between the silhouettes rating scale responses and various anthropometry parameters
Waist to height ratio Waist to hip ratio Waist circumference first reading Self-reported weight in kg BMI Which figure fits best where you are now Which would be ideal for you now
Waist to height ratio Pearson correlation 1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N 232
Waist to hip ratio Pearson correlation .616** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 232 232
Waist circumference first reading Pearson correlation .942** .591** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000
N 232 232 232
Self-reported weight in kg Pearson correlation .676** .270** .724** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .005 .000
N 105 105 105 105
BMI Pearson correlation .751** .190** .724** .809** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .004 .000 .000
N 232 232 232 105 232
Which figure fits best where you are now? Correlation co-efficient -.444** -.121 -.514** -.557** -.534** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .066 .000 .000 .000
N 232 232 232 105 232 232
Which would be ideal for you now? Correlation co-efficient -.271** -.54 -.181** -.259** -.284** .654** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .46 .000 .001 .001 .000
N 232 232 232 105 232 232 232
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). BMI: Body mass index, Gender = Female, Sig.: Significance.

Table 3 shows a lack of alignment between participants’ BMI classification, their perceived body size, and their desired body image. There is a tendency to undervalue the current size and a preference for an average body type as the ideal.

Table 3: Table showing the cross-tabulation of perceived vs. ideal body image according to BMI
Ratings All BMI Classification
p-value
Underweight Normal Overweight Obese 1
Which figure fits best where you are now? 1.00 1(0.4) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) <0.0001
3.00 3(1.3) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 0(0.0) 2(20.0)
4.00 4(1.7) 0(0.0) 2(1.4) 1(4.0) 1(10.0)
5.00 19(8.2) 1(1.7) 14(10.1) 3(12.0) 1(10.0)
6.00 18(7.8) 1(1.7) 7(5.0) 8(32.0) 2(20.0)
7.00 80(34.5) 12(20.7) 57(41.0) 8(32.0) 3(30.0)
8.00 67(28.9) 17(29.3) 45(32.4) 5(20.0) 0(0.0)
9.00 40(17.2) 27(46.6) 12(8.6) 0(0.0) 1(10.0)
Which would be ideal for you now? 1.00 1(0.4) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0) 0.091
2.00 1(0.4) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
3.00 1(0.4) 0(0.0) 1(0.7) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)
4.00 7(3.0) 0(0.0) 5(3.6) 2(8.0) 0(0.0)
5.00 11(4.7) 1(1.7) 9(6.5) 0(0.0) 1(10.0)
6.00 30(12.9) 5(8.6) 19(13.7) 5(20.0) 1(10.0)
7.00 77(33.2) 12(20.7) 52(37.4) 8(32.0) 5(50.0)
8.00 86(37.1) 29(50.0) 44(31.7) 10(40.0) 3(30.0)
9.00 18(7.8) 11(19.0) 7(5.0) 0(0.0) 0(0.0)

BMI: Body mass index.

Table 4 presents a summary of how the study participants classified weight, based on perception of self (“How do you consider yourself”) in relation to their actual Body Mass Index (BMI) classification. There is a notable disparity (p-value = 0.003) between the way participants perceive their weight and their categorised BMI. Most people tend to underestimate their weight rather than overestimate it.

Table 4: Table showing self-reported body weight status compared to BMI classification
All How do you consider yourself
p-value
Underweight Normal in weight Overweight I don’t know
BMI classification Underweight 88(24.9) 5(38.5) 64(23.7) 1(16.7) 18(27.7) 0.003
Normal 224 (63.3) 8(61.5) 178 (65.9) 2(33.3) 36(55.4)
Overweight 31 (8.8) 0(0.0) 21(7.8) 1(16.7) 9(13.8)
Obese 1 11(3.1) 0(0.0) 7(2.6) 2(33.3) 2(3.1)

BMI: Body mass index

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the body image perception of young female participants compared to their actual anthropometry (body measurements). It demonstrated that there is a discrepancy between how the participants perceive their body size and their actual measurements, particularly with respect to underestimation of body size and appearance. There is poor judgement of what they consider the ideal body size for themselves. This suggested a potential disconnect between how young female students perceive their bodies and their actual anthropometry. It suggests that factors beyond physical measurements might influence body image perception. It demonstrated the weight size perception, which has a strong implication on the need for weight control intervention in this population.

Participants tended to underestimate their body size, and to a lesser degree overestimate it. This is in the context of the strong correlation between general obesity measures, such as BMI, and central obesity measures, such as waist circumference, in this population. Even those with a normal BMI were more likely to perceive themselves as fitting into a smaller size. This suggests a potential disconnect between their perception and reality, which may be due to media and sociocultural ideals, as well as Western cultural idealism. Previous studies in this environment have demonstrated discrepancies in body image perceptions, suggesting possible challenges.[11] A previous study of all age groups in the South-Eastern part of Nigeria and a single campus study found high levels of body image discontent.[11,12] This is also in agreement with another previous study, which found that Nigerian females have internalised Eurocentric beauty standards compared to their Kenyan counterparts.[13] The reverse perception of beauty, suggested by media and cultural context, may significantly influence these young people, where beauty is negatively correlated with being overweight/obesity. A higher/tertiary education is associated with exposure to Western culture, an acculturation process that may result in thinness becoming highly valued in Nigeria, especially in the southwestern region.[14]

Individuals with a healthy weight who believe they are overweight or obese may engage in weight-loss behaviours, which can result in them becoming underweight.[12] Likewise, a person who is underweight but sees themselves as larger may not feel the desire to gain weight, or may even engage in weight loss behaviours, depending on their perceived body weight.[12] In addition, individuals who are overweight or obese have a poor perception of their body size.[12] All these are associated with attendant physical and psychosocial implications.

This portrays a strong case for weight-related interventions. There is a significant proportion of malnutrition in this population, as exemplified by obese and underweight people; therefore, there is a need for targeted intervention to correct these anomalies.[7] A number of interrelated biological pathways, including imbalances in the gut microbiome, inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and impaired insulin signalling, have been linked to the long-lasting effects of malnutrition earlier in life.[15] This increases the chances of developing non-communicable diseases such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases in later adulthood.[15]

This study was limited to the female population on the campuses of five higher education institutions in the Ibadan metropolis, which may limit the possibility of exploring wider cultural variations across different populations. This, however, provides evidence for those of the Yoruba cultural background, who constitute the majority of the participants in this study. Also, the cross-sectional nature does not allow the exploration of causality. Notwithstanding its limitations, this study is one of the few that have explored body image perception in relation to actual anthropometry among the Black African population. Therefore, the finding would provide a valuable guide to conducting a bigger study across Nigeria. Furthermore, it provides the basis for further efforts to raise awareness and promote an understanding of the proper concept of body image among young adults, thereby promoting healthy anthropometry.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a significant discrepancy between how Nigerian university students perceive their body size and their actual measurements. This suggests a widespread tendency for students to overestimate their size, raising potential public health concerns. These findings highlight the need for culturally sensitive interventions that promote healthy body image and prevent dissatisfaction among young adults.

Ethical approval

The study, approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Oyo State Ministry of Health in accordance with the National Code of Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC), bearing number AD13/479/1776B, dated 20th March 2020.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

REFERENCES

  1. , , . Body image perception, body shape concern and body shape dissatisfaction among undergraduates students. Jurnal Teknologi. 2016;78:37-42.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Body image assessment: comparison of figure rating scales among urban Black women. Ethnicity & Dis. 2002;12:54-62.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Estimating the prevalence of overweight and obesity in Nigeria in 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2021;53:495-507.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . The swimsuit issue: Correlates of body image in a sample of 52,677 heterosexual adults. Body Image. 2006;3:413-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Contributions of weight perceptions to weight loss attempts: Differences by body mass index and gender. Body Image. 2009;6:90-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Fast food consumption habits among young people in south western Nigeria. Res J Health Sci. 2023;11:77-87.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. ThE profile of anthRopometRy and psyChosocial issuEs on campus (TERRACE) study: A study protocol and preliminary results. Dialogues in Health. 2022;1:100054.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Profile and correlates of sleep quality and obstructive sleep apnnoea among young persons in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2024;41:183-90.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth. 2019;13:S31-S4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Psychometric properties of a Silhouette Rating Scale assessing current and ideal body size and body dissatisfaction in adults. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity. 2022;27:1089-97.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Perception of body image satisfaction among female students in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Res Arts Soc Sci. 2020;13
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Differential perceptions of body image and body weight among adults of different socioeconomic status in a sub-urban population. J Biosoc Sci. 2014;46:279-93.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Body image and Black African women: A comparative study of Kenya and Nigeria. Body Image. 2023;45:331-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. . The impact of advertising and culture on the transformation of body image in Nigeria. University of Central Lancashire; . Availailable from https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/id/eprint/20471/. [Last accessed 2024 May 5]
  15. , , , , , , et al. The double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health. Lancet. 2020;395:75-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections