Translate this page into:
Prevalence of Postnatal Depression in Fathers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Address for correspondence H N Dhanpal, MSc(N), PhD, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Harsha Group of Institution, Bengaluru, Karnataka 562123, India (e-mail: Dhanpal2000@gmail.com)
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Background and Aim
Postnatal depression (PND) can affect both genders, but the common misconception is that it only affects mothers. Increasing literature reports that 10% of the fathers experience PND after childbirth. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine the pooled estimated prevalence of PND among fathers in the postnatal period and identify its risk factors.
Materials and Methods
The electronic databases PubMed, ProQuest, BASE, DOAJ, ResearchGate, Semantic Scholar, and BioMed Central were searched for related open-access articles published between January 2010 and March 2021. Finally, 15 articles met inclusion criteria. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals.
Results
The pooled prevalence of PND in fathers was 24.06%. Partner's depression, lack of social support, poor marital relationship, low income, and low education were all shown to raise the risk of PND in fathers.
Conclusion
PND in fathers is a serious concern. Early identification and treatment decrease the detrimental impact on mother and child while further improving quality of life.
Keywords
fathers
paternal postnatal depression
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
prevalence
risk factors
Introduction
Postnatal depression (PND) or postpartum depression (PPD) is a nonpsychotic depressive disorder that occurs within the first year after childbirth.1 PND can affect both mothers and fathers, although it has been associated with mothers in particular.2 However, increasing literature shows that PND is not uncommon in fathers, and 10% or 1 in 10 fathers around the world experience depression after childbirth.3 The prevalence of PND in fathers during the first year after childbirth has been found to range from 4 to 25%, with a 50% rise when the mother is also depressed.23 PND is most prevalent within 3 to 6 months postpartum.134 A more recent meta-estimate recorded for PND in fathers within the postpartum period was 8.4%.4 This is greater than the overall male adult population's rate of depression (4.8%).3
Several factors that precipitate PND in fathers have been reported by researches including partner's depression, previous history of depression, unemployment, low education, poor marital relationship, lack of social support, and an unplanned pregnancy.56 The strongest predictor of PND in fathers was found to be their partner's depression during the postnatal period.6 A growing body of research suggests that fathers, like mothers, are more likely to experience PPD due to the hormonal fluctuations that occur during their partner's pregnancy and postnatal period. Lower levels of hormones, including the sex hormones testosterone and estrogen, the stress hormone cortisol, and bonding hormones vasopressin and prolactin, may contribute to the risk of PND in fathers.7 PND in fathers varies from PND in women in several respects, including clinical symptoms and onset. Fathers display greater male-specific symptoms such as indecisiveness, cynicism, avoidance behavior, anger attacks, affective rigidity, self-criticism, and irritability over low mood. Other symptoms of PND in fathers include marital conflict, partner violence, substance use, negative parenting and somatic symptoms such as indigestion, changes in appetite and weight, diarrhea, constipation, headache, toothache, nausea, and insomnia.789 These symptoms are more prevalent in fathers than in mothers,10 and they can mask depression in fathers.1112 PND develops more slowly and gradually in fathers than in mothers.1
PND has a detrimental influence on the health and well-being of both fathers and their families. Failure to fulfill obligations at home and at work, lack of interest, exhaustion, stress, and an increased risk of suicide in fathers are all negative effects of PND.1314 The negative impact on their family and child includes complications in marital relationships and the development of behavioral and emotional problems in their children.7
Depression in fathers is often detected by using clinical diagnostic interviews and/or self-report measures. The clinical diagnostic interviews are done by using the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5, APA) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10, WHO). DSM-5 defines PND in mothers as a major depressive disorder that begins within 4 weeks of childbirth,15 while the ICD-10 defines it as a depressive episode that occurs within 6 weeks of childbirth.16 Several researches, however, show that PND in fathers occurs throughout the first 12 months following childbirth, with the highest rates observed at 3 to 6 months postpartum,1317 and men might display distinct depressive symptoms than women,1017 which aren't in the diagnostic criteria's list.18 Self-report measures used to detect PND in fathers include Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression.7 These tools may be less effective in assessing PND in fathers as they are gender-biased and overlook significant symptoms that depressed fathers' exhibit.12 EPDS is the most commonly used screening tool to detect PND in mothers and it has been validated for fathers as well.7
There are no known comprehensive clinical interventions that have been designed especially for fathers with PND. The existing evidence suggests that fathers with PND would benefit from pharmacological and psychological therapies alone or in combination.17 Antidepressants are used to treat moderate-to-severe levels of depression in fathers. Psychological therapies for treating mild-to-moderate depression include supportive psychotherapy, cognitive behavior therapy, interpersonal therapy, and mindfulness-based interventions.19 Other interventions include educational programs for fathers and their spouses, as well as support and recognition of the father's role and feelings from other family members to reduce or prevent PND in fathers.7
PND in fathers is a clinically significant problem with higher community-based care costs.20 Despite this, PND in fathers is under-screened, under-diagnosed, and under-treated.21 Various scholars and countries have investigated PND in fathers, but it is still in its early stages in India. The goal of this review is to raise the understanding regarding PND in fathers and its associated risk factors. Thus, this review aims to determine the pooled estimated prevalence of PND in fathers and to determine its risk factors.
Methodology
The systematic review reporting follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Search Strategy
PubMed, ProQuest, BASE, DOAJ, ResearchGate Semantic Scholar, and BioMed Central electronic databases were searched for articles published between 2010 to March 2021 by using the following terms with Boolean operators (“OR”/ “AND”): “father” OR “paternal” AND “Postnatal depression” OR “postpartum depression.”
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Articles were chosen for inclusion based on the following criteria: 1) Journal articles that examined the prevalence of PND in fathers and its associated factors, 2) Cross-sectional research design, 3) Published in the English language, 4) Published between 2010 and October 2021, 5) Original research articles, and 6) Full free and open-access articles. Exclusion criteria were 1) Journal articles abstracts, Review articles, Commentaries, Conference Reports, and Thesis, 2) Interventional articles, 3) Duplication, and 4) Articles not relevant to the study.
Data Extraction
Two authors extracted data from the studies that were included: one extracted the data, while the other validated it. Any disagreements between the authors were settled through discussion. The data extracted from the eligible studies were year of citation, author, country, research design, sample size, response rate, recruitment setting, assessment points, assessment instrument, cutoff score, and prevalence.
Methodological Quality Assessment
Two independent authors used the Mirza and Jenkins checklist to determine the methodological quality of the included studies. The critical appraisal checklist included the following criteria: 1) clear study objectives, 2) adequate sample size (or justification), 3) representative sample (with justification), 4) clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5) depression measure used is reliable and valid, 6) reported response rate and/or losses explained, 7) adequate description of data, 8) appropriate statistical analyses, and with additional criterion 9) appropriate informed consent.22 Each criterion of the checklist is answered by “yes” (1 point) or “no” (no point). Based on the points obtained by the studies were graded between 1 and 9. Regardless of their quality, all of the studies were included.
Data Analysis
In this review, the random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of PND in fathers with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The heterogeneity of the included studies was measured by using I2 statistics. Visual assessment of a funnel plot and Egger's regression test was used to detect publication bias.
Results
Search Results and Inclusion of Articles
A total of 2,857 articles were found through a database search. A total of 2,769 articles were excluded after an initial screening for a variety of reasons (Fig. 1). A total of 43 full-free text articles were chosen and screened against inclusion criteria. Finally, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria.
-
Fig. 1 Literature search flow chart based on PRISMA.
Study Characteristics
All the 15 cross-sectional studies selected232425262728293031323334353637 investigated the prevalence of PND and its associated factors. Included studies were conducted in India (3)252829 Iran (2),2326 Japan (1),24 Italy (1),27 Sweden (1),30 Ethiopia (1),35 Saudi Arabia (3),333436 Ireland (1),31 Chile (1),32 and China (1).37 The key features of the studies included are briefly listed in Table 1.
|
Study |
Study design |
Sample size |
Study setting |
Time of data collection (postpartum) |
Study tool |
Cutoff score |
Prevalence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kamalifard et al,23 Iran, 2014 |
Cross-sectional |
230 fathers |
Institution |
At 6–12 week |
EPDS |
≥ 12 |
11.7% |
|
Nishimura et al24 Japan, 2015 |
Cross-sectional |
2,032 couples |
Community |
At 4 months |
EPDS |
≥ 8 |
13.6. % |
|
Thilagavathy25 India, 2015 |
Cross-sectional |
129 fathers |
Institution |
At 4–5 months |
EPDS |
9 |
59% |
|
Ahmadi et al,26 Iran, 2015 |
Cross-sectional |
328 fathers |
Institution |
At 8th week |
EPDS |
> 12 |
59.8% |
|
Epifanio et al,27 Italy, 2015 |
Cross-sectional |
75 couples |
Institution |
At first month |
EPDS |
> 12 |
5.7% |
|
Goyal et al,28 India, 2017 |
Cross-sectional |
480 couples |
Institution |
At 48 hours |
EPDS |
>11 |
12.94% |
|
Salian and Shah,29 India, 2017 |
Cross-sectional |
128 couples |
Community |
Not mentioned |
EPDS |
>10 |
30% |
|
Carlberg et al,30 Sweden, 2018 |
Cross-sectional |
8,011fathers |
Community |
At 3–6 months |
EPDS GMDS |
≥ 10 ≥ 13 |
13.3% 8.6% |
|
Philpott and Corcoran31 Ireland, 2018 |
Cross-sectional |
100 fathers |
Community |
Up to 12months |
EPDS |
≥ 9 |
28% |
|
Pérez et al,32 Chile, 2018 |
Cross-sectional |
382 couples |
Institution |
At 2 months |
EPDS BDI |
≥ 10 13/14 |
18.5 10.5 |
|
Shaheen et al,33 Saudi Arabia, 2019 |
Cross-sectional |
347 fathers |
Institution |
Up to 6 months |
EPDS DSM-5 |
8/9 |
16.6% |
|
AlHaisoni and Ayman,34 Saudi Arabia, 2019 |
Cross-sectional |
226 fathers |
Institution |
Up to12 months |
EPDS |
≥ 9 |
32.7% |
|
Markos and Arba35 Ethiopia, 2020 |
Cross-sectional |
423 fathers |
Institution |
Above 4 weeks |
EPDS |
≥10 |
17% |
|
Alghamdi et al,36 Saudi Arabia, 2020 |
Cross-sectional |
182 fathers |
Institution |
At 4–8 weeks |
EPDS |
>10 |
27.3% |
|
Cui et al,37 China, 2021 |
Cross-sectional |
212 fathers |
Institution |
Up to 6 months |
EPDS |
10 |
24.1% |
Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; GMDS, Gotland Male Depression Scale.
Quality Assessment
According to the previously stated criterion, the quality of the included studies varied from 7 to 9 out of a possible maximum of 9, suggesting that these studies were of high methodological quality in general. Table 2 summarizes the findings of this assessment.
|
Sl. No. |
Study |
C1 |
C2 |
C3 |
C4 |
C5 |
C6 |
C7 |
C8 |
C9 |
Total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 |
Kamalifard et al23 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
|
2 |
Nishimura et al24 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
3 |
Thilagavathy25 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
|
4 |
Ahmadi et al26 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
|
5 |
Epifanio et al27 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
6 |
Goyal et al28 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
7 |
Salian and Shah et al29 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
|
8 |
Carlberg et al30 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
9 |
Philpott and Corcoran31 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
|
10 |
Pérez et al32 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
|
11 |
Shaheen et al33 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
12 |
AlHaisoni and Ayman34 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
13 |
Markos and Arba35 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
|
14 |
Alghamdi et al36 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
|
15 |
Cui et al37 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
C1-Clear study objectives; C2-Adequate sample size or justification; C3-Representative Sample (with justification); C4-Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria; C5-Depression measure used is reliable and valid; C6-Reported response rate and /or losses explained; C7-Adequate description of data; C8-Appropriate statistical analyses; C9-Appropriate informed consent.
Description of Study Subjects
Only fathers were the research subjects in 10 of the 15 studies,23252630313334353637 while couples were the study subjects in the remaining studies.24272832
Sample Size and Sampling Technique
In studies with only fathers as a sample, the sample size ranged from 100 to 80,112232526303133343536 and in studies with couples as a sample, the sample size ranged from 75 to 20322427282932 Four of the 15 studies used probability sampling techniques,23313335 five used nonprobability sampling techniques,2526282934 and the others did not mention.
Study Setting
The studies included in this review varied in terms of the time and setting in which participants were recruited. The participants of the studies were recruited at different time points from childbirth to 12 months of postpartum. Participants were recruited in five studies within 3 months of postpartum.2326272836 Three studies between 3 and 6 months,242530 four studies between birth and 12 months,31323435 and two studies within 6 months of childbirth.3337 Eleven studies recruited a sample from institutional-based setting,2325262728323334353637 and four studies from community-based setting.24293031
Tool Used to Measure Paternal Postnatal Depression
The EPDS was used in all of the studies to screen fathers for PND. However, the cutoff score for the PND screening varied. For positive PND screening, five studies used an EPDS cutoff score of more than or equal to 12,2326273031 six studies used a cutoff score of more than or equal to 10,2930323334353637 three studies used a cutoff score of more than or equal to 9,253134 two study used a EPDS cutoff score of more than or equal to 8,2433 and one study used an EPDS cutoff score of more than or equal to 11.28 The BDI with a cutoff score of 13/1432 and the Gotland Male Depression (GMD) Scale with a cutoff score of more than or equal to 1330 were also used as screening measures. To compare the screening findings, two studies used the BDI and GMD with EPDS.3032 After screening with EPDS, one study used the DSM-5 to determine a PND diagnosis.33
Prevalence of Postnatal Depression
The Pooled Prevalence of Postnatal Depression
Fifteen studies with a total of 13285 fathers were examined. The prevalence of PPD in the included studies ranged between 5.7 and 59.8%.232425262728293031323334353637 The pooled prevalence of PPD in fathers was estimated to be 24.06% (95% CI: 19.35, 28.77; Fig. 2). The studies included in the review had a high degree of heterogeneity between them (I2 = 97%, p < 0.00001).
-
Fig. 2 A forest plot of prevalence of postnatal depression among fathers. CI, confidence interval; IV, intravenous; SE, standard error.
Subgroup Analysis
Subgroup Analysis: Pooled Prevalence of PND among Fathers in India and Other Countries
The pooled prevalence of PND among fathers in India was 19.41%252829 (95% CI: 16.74, 22.08), whereas the pooled prevalence of PND among fathers in Saudi Arabia was 25.31%333436 (95% CI: 12.69, 20.51) and Iran it was 35.72%2326 (95% CI: 11.42, 82.86). The studies that were included for PND prevalence estimates in India (I2 = 98%; p < 0.00001), Saudi Arabia (I2 = 91%, p < 0.00001), and Iran (I2 = 97%, p < 0.00001) had higher heterogeneity.
Subgroup Analysis Based on the Time of Data Collection
The pooled prevalence of PND in fathers was found to be 19.26% (95% CI: 17.32, 21.21) within 3 months after the childbirth,2326272836 13.64% (95% CI: 12.98, 14.30) between 3 and 6 months242530 and 18.97% (95% CI: 15.73, 20.21) within 6 months,3337 and 20.60% (95% CI: 18.26, 22.93) from birth up to 12 months postpartum.31323435 There was a substantial heterogeneity in the studies that were included for PND prevalence estimates between birth and 3 months (I2 = 99%, p < 0.00001), 3 to 6 months (I2 = 98%, p < 0.00001), birth to 6 months (I2 = 78%, p = 0.03), and birth to 12 months postpartum (I2 = 87%, p < 0.0001). PND was shown to be more prevalent in fathers within the first year after childbirth, with the highest prevalence occurring within 3 months after childbirth.
Subgroup Analysis of the Prevalence of PND in Fathers Based on the Setting of the Study
The pooled prevalence of PND among fathers was 19.46% (95% CI: 18.09, 20.83) for the studies conducted in the institution-based setting (95% CI: 13.99, 13, 59)2325262728323334353637 and 13.49% for the studies conducted in the community setting (95% CI: 12.77, 14.22).24293031 Studies conducted in institutional-based settings showed significant heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, p < 0.00001) as well as in the community setting (I2 = 99%, p < 0.00001).
Subgroup Analysis of Pooled Prevalence of Postnatal Depression by the EPDS Cutoff Scores
Studies that utilized EPDS cutoff scores more than or equal to 9, more than or equal to 10, and more than or equal to 12 to estimate the prevalence of PND found 38.39% (95% CI: 34.07, 42.71),253134 14.07% (95% CI: 13.37, 14.77),293032353637 and 8.80% (95% CI: 8.21, 9.38),2326273031 respectively. Considerable heterogeneity was found in studies used cutoff scores more than or equal to 9 on EPDS (I2 = 94%, p < 0.00001), cutoff score more than or equal to 10 (I2 = 91%, p < 0.00001), and cutoff score more than or equal to 12 on EPDS (I2 = 99%, p < 0.00001).
Publication Bias
Subjective visualization of the funnel plot demonstrated asymmetry (Fig. 3) and p-value for Egger's test (p = 0.015) indicated possible publication bias.
-
Fig. 3 Funnel plot for publication bias.
Risk Factors
Out of 15 studies, 112324262830313233353637 studies reported risk factors for PND in fathers. Partner's depression,2432 lack of social support,233135 poor marital partnership satisfaction,243536 low income,303135 low education,2630 perceived stress,2336 and infant sleep problems3135 were the most frequently identified risk factors. Other factors reported were history of infertility treatment, economic anxiety, the experience of visiting medical institutions due to mental health problems,24 unemployment,2637 maternal distress,27 family livelihood situation,28 history of depression, no paternity leave,31 feeling isolated and disconnected from partner,33 substance use, unplanned pregnancy,35 family and work-related problems, family related problems, work–family conflict, trouble sleeping, low self-esteem,36 and vulnerable personality traits.37
Discussion
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies with a total of 13,285 participants. The pooled estimated prevalence of PND in fathers was found to be 24.06% during first year postpartum and studies had higher degree of heterogeneity between them. This study's pooled estimate is relatively higher and not consistent with previous systematic review and meta-analysis findings (10.4 and 8.4%).34 The possible reason for the observed difference in the estimate of PND in fathers might be due to the variations in the cutoff score, sample size, cultural context, assessment time, and measures used in the studies included for the analysis. The other reason for the wide variation in the prevalence estimate of this study was the use of self-reporting measures to estimate the prevalence of PND in the included studies. It has been observed that self-reporting measures provide high prevalence estimates than the interview-based methods.38 A systemic review and meta-analysis involving 14 studies with 3,819 participants found that the estimated prevalence of PND in fathers was 16.8% when self-rating scales were used to measure PND and 4.1% when interview-based method was used.39
In the subgroup analysis, the pooled prevalence of PND among fathers in India was found to be 19.41% that was relatively higher than the estimated prevalence of PND among fathers in China (13.6%)39 and surpasses the worldwide estimated prevalence of PND in fathers.3438 However, the estimated prevalence of PND in India was lower than Saud Arabia and Iran.
The higher prevalence rates of PND were observed within the 3 months of childbirth (19.26%) in this study and the finding was consistent with a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in China (28.7%)39 and inconsistent with study findings of Paulson and Bazemore, they reported higher prevalence rates of PND during 3 to 6 months of postpartum.3 The pooled prevalence of PND in fathers for studies conducted in institutional-based setting was 19.46% and for community setting it was 13.49%. This difference might be due to the large standard error and small sample size in the majority of the included studies for the analysis. The cutoff score used on the EPDS scale including more than or equal to 9, more than or equal to 10, and more than or equal to 12 reported different prevalence rates and the studies used the cutoff score more than or equal to 9 reported the higher pooled prevalence rate (38.39%) compared with the other studies used other two cutoff scores. The possible reason for this might be the use of unvalidated cutoff scores. The Matthey et al in their study found that use of empirically not validated cutoff score on EPDS might lead to significant difference in the interpretation of rates of PND.38
The most frequently found risk factors in the current review were partner's depression, lack of social support, poor marital partnership satisfaction, low income, and low education. Other common risk factors identified by previous researches such as unemployment and previous history of depression were not reported by the majority of the studies (10/15) under the current review.
It is evident from the current review and meta-analysis that prevalence rate of PND among fathers in India is higher than the global PND estimates. According to a systematic review undertaken in India, 22% of mothers experience PND.40 Mothers' PND is a strong indicator of PND in their partners. Furthermore, when their partners were depressed in the postpartum period, PND in fathers ranged from 24 to 50%.2 Nonetheless, PND in mothers gains more emphasis. There is a need for focusing on the mental health of fathers during the postnatal period, as fathers currently are under screened, underdiagnosed, and undertreated for mental health problems.
The findings of this study might benefit healthcare workers and policy makers to understand the magnitude and risk factors of PND so that necessary guidelines and protocols can be developed to screen and treat PND.
Conclusion
PND in fathers is a serious concern and must be regarded as a public health issue. The mental health of fathers should be included in postpartum mental health assessments as early diagnosis and treatment decrease the detrimental impact on mother and child while further improving quality of life.
Limitations
A small number of open-access cross-sectional studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of PND in fathers from this study must be interpreted in light of the considerable heterogeneity found across the studies, and the inclusion of two or three studies in the subgroup analysis might affect the estimates' accuracy. Furthermore, only open-access peer-reviewed articles were considered for this study. The inclusion of non-open-access articles, gray literature, and book chapters might have an impact on the current study's findings.
Conclusion
PND in fathers is a serious concern and must be regarded as a public health issue. The mental health of fathers should be included in postpartum mental health assessments as early diagnosis and treatment decrease the detrimental impact on mother and child while further improving quality of life.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
- Paternal and maternal depressed mood during the transition to parenthood. J Affect Disord. 2000;60(02):75-85.
- [Google Scholar]
- Postpartum depression beyond the early postpartum period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33(04):410-420.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers and its association with maternal depression: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;303(19):1961-1969.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence of paternal depression in pregnancy and the postpartum: an updated meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:189-203.
- [Google Scholar]
- Gender differences in postpartum depression: a longitudinal cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(04):320-326.
- [Google Scholar]
- The course and interrelationship of maternal and paternal perinatal depression. Arch Women Ment Health. 2016;19(04):655-663.
- [Google Scholar]
- Bringing birth-related paternal depression to the fore. Women Birth. 2008;21(02):65-70.
- [Google Scholar]
- Effects of paternal depression on fathers' parenting behaviors: a meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(02):167-180.
- [Google Scholar]
- The experience of symptoms of depression in men vs women: analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(10):1100-1106.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal postpartum depression: how can nurses begin to help? Contemp Nurse. 2010;34(02):199-210.
- [Google Scholar]
- Peripartum depression-does it occur in fathers and does it matter? J Men's Health. 2010;7(04):420-430.
- [Google Scholar]
- Risk of suicide and mixed episode in men in the postpartum period. J Affect Disord. 2011;132((1-2):):243-246.
- [Google Scholar]
- Depressive disorders In: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. p. :153-188.
- [Google Scholar]
- The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines 1992.
- [Google Scholar]
- Should men be screened and treated for postnatal depression? Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(01):1-3.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal Postnatal Psychiatric Illnesses: A Clinical Case Book. Gewerbestrasse Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
- [Google Scholar]
- Healthcare costs of paternal depression in the postnatal period. J Affect Disord. 2011;133((1-2):):356-360.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal postpartum depression: what health care providers should know. J Pediatr Health Care. 2013;27(06):479-485.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence and determinants of common perinatal mental disorders in women in low- and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(02):139G-149G.
- [Google Scholar]
- Relationship between fathers' depression and perceived social support and stress in postpartum period. J Caring Sci. 2014;3(01):57-66.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal postnatal depression in Japan: an investigation of correlated factors including relationship with a partner. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:128.
- [Google Scholar]
- Are first time fathers at risk for paternal postpartal non – psychotic depression? MJN. 2015;6(02):17-23.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence of parental postnatal depression in fathers and its relationship with demographic characteristics. JCCNC. 2015;1:159-164.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal and maternal transition to parenthood: the risk of postpartum depression and parenting stress. Pediatr Rep. 2015;7(02):5872.
- [Google Scholar]
- Correlation of infant gender with postpartum maternal and paternal depression and exclusive breastfeeding rates. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12(05):279-282.
- [Google Scholar]
- Psychosocial factors in post-partum parents in India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4(04):1324-1331.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal perinatal depression assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Gotland male depression scale: prevalence and possible risk factors. Am J Men Health. 2018;12(04):720-729.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal postnatal depression in Ireland: Prevalence and associated factors. Midwifery. 2018;56:121-127.
- [Google Scholar]
- Assessment of postpartum depression in a group of Chilean parents. J Men's Health. 2018;14(02):56-64.
- [Google Scholar]
- Paternal postnatal depression among fathers of newborn in Saudi Arabia. Am J Men Health. 2019;13(01):1557988319831219.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence of paternal postpartum depression among fathers visiting Well-Baby Clinic at Prince Sultan military medical city 2018. IJMSCR. 2019;2:486-497.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression among Male Partners who came to postnatal Follow-UP Clinic with their partner in selected Public Health Centers of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia, 2019. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:2307-2316.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence and correlates of paternal postpartum depression in Saudi Arabia. J Men's Health. 2020;16(01):41-52.
- [Google Scholar]
- Prevalence and factors associated with male postnatal depression in China. J Men's Health. 2021;17(01):22-27.
- [Google Scholar]
- Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: implications for clinical and research practice. Arch Women Ment Health. 2006;9(06):309-315.
- [Google Scholar]
- [Prevalence of paternal postpartum depression in China and its association with maternal postpartum depression: a meta-analysis] Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2016;41(10):1082-1089. (Med Sci)
- [Google Scholar]
- Postpartum depression in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(10):706-717C.
- [Google Scholar]