Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
3 (
1
); 17-20
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703627

Prevalence Of Refractive Errors In Adolescents In Out- Patient Attendees Of The Preventive Ophthalmology Clinic Of Community Medicine, S K I M S, Kashmir, India

Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, DHP Multispeciality Hospital, Pulwama, J&K, India
Junior Resident (Preventive Ophthalmology),Department of Community Medicine, DHP Multispeciality Hospital, Pulwama, J&K, India
B Grade/Consultant Medicine Department of Medicine, DHP Multispeciality Hospital, Pulwama, J&K, India
Senior Resident, Department of Community Medicine, S K I M S, J&K, India
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, DHP Multispeciality Hospital, Pulwama, J&K, India
B-Grade Surgeon, Health Department, J&K, Srinagar, J&K, India

Correspondence: Syed Arshad Hussain Andrabi B-Grade/Consultant (Internal Medicine), Tropical Medicine Unit, D H P, Multispeciality Hospital Pulwama, J&K, India +91 96974 50431 +91 99069 69733 India syed.arshadhussain@yahoo.co.in

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Blindness is one of the most significant social problems in India with uncorrected refractive errors as the second major cause accounting for 19.7% of blindness and low vision.

All adolescents (12-18 years) attending the eye clinic from Jan 2007-Jan 2009 for any eye ailment were examined and screened for refractive error using Snellen's chart.

Out of total 930 adolescents, 508(54.62%) of adolescents had refractive errors. Of the total males and females examined 57.43% and 52.12% respectively had refractive errors. The mean age of presentation was 14.3 years. Most of the adolescents presented with myopia 257(50.59%) followed by astigmatism (35.23%) and hypermetropia (14.17%).

High prevalence of refractive errors warrants early detection and treatment.

Keywords

Refractive errors
adolescents
hypermetropia
myopia
astigmatism

Introduction

An estimated 180 million people world- wide are visibly disabled, of whom nearly 45 million are blind, four out of five of them live in developing countries. One third of the world's blind (about 15 million) are in SEAR (South east Asian region) and 50 % of world's blind children live in this region. Blindness is one of the most significant social problems in India with uncorrected refractive errors as the second major cause accounting for 19.7% of blindness and low vision. In India Adolescents constitute 23-25 % of the population. Poor vision in childhood affects performance in school or at work and has a negative influence on the future life of the child. (1)

Three main types are considered as refractive errors: hypermetropia (farsightedness), myopia (nearsightedness) and astigmatism. (2,3) The prevalence of myopia is currently attracting worldwide attention as many recent studies report dramatic increases over the last 20 years.Moreover, planning of a youth's career is very much dependent on the visual acuity, especially in jobs for navy, military, railways and aviation(4). This warrants early detection and treatment of refractive errors to prevent permanent disability. Diagnosis and treatment of these errors is relatively simple and is one of the easiest ways to reduce impaired vision.

Access this article online

Children do not complain of defective vision, and may not even be aware of their problem. They adjust to the poor eyesight by sitting near the blackboard, holding the books closer to their eyes, squeezing the eyes and even avoiding work requiring visual concentration. This warrants early detection and treatment to prevent permanent disability. (4)

The present study was carried out in the preventive ophthalmology clinic of the department of community medicine. The study was conducted with the aim of assessing the prevalence of refractive errors in adolescents (12-18 years) because any residual hypermetropia of childhood usually gets neutralized by this age and this is the age when children start using their visual system to its full extent so that even minor anomalies are noticed by the patients. It presents the prevalence of refractive errors by age, sex, class, type of error and socio-economic status in Srinagar city.

Material and methods

All adolescents (12-18 years) attending the eye clinic from Jan 2007- Jan 2009 for any eye ailment were included in the study. All of them were examined by an ophthalmologist present in the clinic. The screening was done from a six meters distance, on Snellen's chart.

Adolescents with visual acuity less than 6/9 were subjected to refraction test at the clinic. Subjective refraction was performed by achieving best corrected visual acuity, while cycloplegic refraction was advised for adolescents when best corrected visual acuity could not be achieved.

Adolescents presenting organic defects in eye such as corneal opacity, opacity of the lens, choroid and retinal disorders were excluded from study.

Results

Out of total 930 adolescents examined 493 (53.01%) were females rest were males (46.98%). 508(54.62%) of adolescents had refractive errors. Of the total males and females examined 57.43% and 52.12% respectively had refractive errors Fig -1. The mean age of presentation was 14.3 years 158 adolescents presented to the clinic in the age group 0f 17-18 years with 73% of them having refractive errors followed by 12 -13 year age group in whom 70.09% had refractive errors this was followed by other age groups showing presence of more refractive errors at two extremes of adolescence. Figure -2

Gender wise distribution of adolescents with refractive errors
Figure 1
Gender wise distribution of adolescents with refractive errors

Most of the adolescents presented with myopia 257(50.59%) followed by Astigmatism (35.23%) and hypermetropia (14.17%). Both myopia (54.48%) and Hypermetropia (52.78%) was found more in females as compared to males. Astigmatism was more prevalent in Males. Fig -3

TABLE 1 Symmetry of refractive errors

Isometropia

Anisometropia

Total

Sex

No

%

No

%

No

%

Male

201

(80.07)

50

(19.93)

251

(49.41)

Female

235

(91.60)

22

(08.40)

257

(50.59)

Total

436

(86.02)

72

(13.98)

508

Table- I: shows that 436(86.02%) of adolescents with refractive errors had isometropic error while rest had anisometropia (13.98%). More females presented with isometropia (91.60%.) than males(80.07%)

Line diagram showing age wise distribution of students with refractive errors
Figure 2
Line diagram showing age wise distribution of students with refractive errors
Type of refractive errors
Figure 3
Type of refractive errors
TABLE 2 Family history of adolescents with refractive errors

Family h/o refractive error

Type of error

Total (%)

not present

Present

Myopia

100 (38.91)

157 (61.09)

257 (50.59)

Hypermetropia

21 (29.17)

51 (70.83)

72 (14.17)

Astigmatism

36 (20.11)

143 (79.89)

179 (35.24)

Total

157 (30.90)

351 (69.10)

508

Table-2 shows that 31% had a family history of refractive errors. Family history was more in myopics (38.91%) followed by hypermetropia and Astigmatism 29.16% and 20.11% respectively.

We also found that 50.00% of adolescent's belonged to social class 11 followed by class 111,1v, and v 28.00%, 17.00%, 2.00%respectively.

Discussion

In our study the prevalence of refractive errors was quite high at 54.62%. The overall incidence in India has been reported to vary between 21% and 25% in patients attending eye outpatient departments.(5) Similar prevalence of refractive errors has been observed among children of 12-17 years in Ahmedabad city.(6 ) A (32%) prevalence rate of refractive errors has been reported among school children of age 3-18 years from South India. (7) However Matta et al reports a prevalence of 12.5%.(8) Datta et al report a low prevalence of refractive errors ( 2%) from Eastern India among primary school children (5-13 years), which could not be explained.(9) Padhye et al reports cluster-weighted prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in urban and rural children was 5.46% (95% CI, 5.445.48) and 2.63% (95% CI, 2.62-2.64), respectively. A study reports prevalence of myopia, hypermetropia and astigmatism in urban children as 3.16%, 1.06% and 0.16%, respectively. (10)

Internationally, lower prevalence of refractive errors (2.75.8%) has been reported among children of age 5-15 years from Africa, Finland, Chile and Nepal as compared to the present study.(11,12,13,14) These differences may be explained by the different diagnostic criteria used by different authors, racial or ethnic variations in the prevalence of refractive errors, different lifestyles or living conditions .High rate of refractive errors in our study population can also be attributed to racial or ethnic variations or different lifestyles or living conditions like watching TV for long hours, or using computers as most of our adolescents are confined indoors due to long standing turmoil in the valley.

Refractive errors found in our study did not differ significantly between males and females. Similarly in a study by Sonam Sethi no significant differences were found between males and females.(6),while in other studies refractive errors were found to be more common in girls than in boys.(7,15) In these studies the differences were related to the possible differences in the rate of growth between girls and boys.

It was also found that 50.59% were myopics followed by hypermetropia and astigmatism. Matta S, Laatkeinin and Sonam Seth also report that myopia was more common followed by Astigmatism and Hypermetropia. In our study 17-18 year age group presented with more refractive errors compared to studies which report higher prevalence in 1213 year age group. (6,8 )

38.91% of Myopics had a family history of myopia, various studies have also proved some relation with respect to family history particularly in myopia (11)

Conclusion

Prevalence of refractive errors in our study was found to be very high, thereby warranting early diagnosis and treatment to prevent permanent blindness.

References

  1. . Parks Text Book of Preventive and social Medicine. 2011
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 2000 1898-1899
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , . Myopia in Singapore: taking a public health approach. Br J Ophthalmol.. 2001;85:521-526.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med.. 2004;33:23-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . An epidemiological pattern of cases of refractive errors. J Indian Med Assoc. 1978;72:227-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Prevalence of refractive errors in school children (12-17 years) of Ahmedabad City. Indian J Community Med. 2000;25:181-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Visual impairment in school children in Southern India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997;45:129-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Refractive errors among adolescents attending ophthalmology OPD. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2006;31(2):114-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . An epidemiological study of ocular condition among school children of Calcutta Corporation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1983;31:505-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and other eye problems among urban and rural school children. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2009;16:69-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Prevalence of eye diseases in primary school children in a rural area of Tanzania. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1291-1297.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Refractive errors and other ocular findings in school children. Acta Ophthalmol. 1980;58:129-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Refractive error study in children: Results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:445-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Refractive error study in children: Sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:421-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Myopie and educational attainment in 421116 young Singaporean males. . 1992;21((6)):785-91.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections