Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Media & News
Original Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Series
Media & News
Original Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JHS-2024-10-1-R1-(1586)

Psychological Well-Being and Coping Strategies Among Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Correlative Study

Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College (Yenepoya deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, India

* Corresponding author: Dr. Hezil Reema Barboza, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College (Yenepoya deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, India. hezilreemabarboza@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Vijayalaxmi, Barboza HR. Psychological Well-Being and Coping Strategies Among Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Correlative Study. J Health Allied Sci NU. doi: 10.25259/JHS-2024-10-1-R1-(1586)

Abstract

Objectives

A diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a most typical complication of diabetes mellitus that occurs due to poor glycaemic control, improper foot care, and dry skin. Well-being may be adversely affected by non-healing wounds. Inadequate coping strategies lead to adverse effects. The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between psychological well-being and coping strategies among patients with DFU.

Material and Methods

A non-experimental correlative study was conducted among patients (n=90) with DFU in a selected hospital in Karnataka. Patients were selected purposively based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data was collected using a psychological general well-being scale and brief COPE questionnaire.

Results

The findings of the study revealed that 43 (47.8%) participants showed strong distress. There was a negative correlation of psychological well-being with problem-focused coping (r=- 0.22, p=0.03) and avoidant-focused coping (r=- 0.34, p=0.01). There was a significant association between psychological well-being and age (p=0.022) and monthly income (p=0.03). Emotional coping strategies were associated with the type of family (p=0.006), and avoidant coping strategies were associated with the age of the patients (p=0.021).

Conclusion

This study showed that patients with diabetic feet were in strong distress. A negative correlation existed between psychological well-being and coping strategies such as problem-focused coping and avoidant-focused coping. The study highlights the need for behavioural therapies regarding the adaptation of coping strategies to manage their actions and emotions.

Keywords

Coping strategies
complications
Distress
Patients with diabetic foot ulcers
Psychological well being

INTRODUCTION

India is slowly progressing towards the top of the most significant number of patients with diabetes. In 2019, estimates indicated that 77 million individuals in India had diabetes, and this figure is projected to cross 134 million by 2045.[1] In India, 25% of diabetic patients develop foot ulcers, out of which 50% require hospitalisation and 20% need an amputation. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs contribute to approximately 80% of all non-traumatic amputations in India annually.[2] DFUs affect 50% of type 1 and 2 diabetic patients and make them vulnerable to developing these complications that may lead to morbidity. [3,4] A history of non-diabetic foot ulceration increases the risk of developing ulceration among diabetic patients in their lifetime. Due to this, one-third of patients suffer from clinical depression, which further leads to disturbance in psychological well-being.[5] Approximately two-thirds of foot ulcers will heal within 6-12 months until it is an emotional and physical burden for patients.[6]

DFUs seriously impact individual response and retard wound healing. The perception of disease is different from person to person based on the severity of the disease. Stress and anxiety due to the severity of the disease make the individual feel frustrated, insecure, fearful, and helpless.[6] To maintain their mental health, the person resorts to coping mechanisms in response to psychological stress. If the person adopts good coping strategies, there are fewer chances of disturbances in psychological well-being.[7,8]

The emotional, behavioural, and psychological needs of patients with diabetes are negotiated. Personal efforts to meet these challenges fail to succeed as anticipated when the complications of diabetes take their toll on physical and psychological health.[9] People using effective coping strategies are less likely to withstand the adverse effects of stressors. But if the coping strategies are inadequate, they experience negative effects.[10] Foot ulcers are agonising and expensive for every patient and the health care system. A positive outcome is vital in preventing amputation and providing a better prognosis in terms of life span.[10,11] DFUs themselves involve modification in lifestyle, diet, and frequent medical examination, thus affecting psychological well-being. Some people will adopt healthy coping strategies, and some will not use any strategy that negatively affects their health. The primary aim of the present study was to determine the correlation between psychological well-being and coping strategies among patients with DFU.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A descriptive correlational study was conducted in the diabetic units of a tertiary care hospital in Karnataka, South India. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the experts of the Scientific Review Board and Institutional Ethics Committee (Approval number: YEC2/1049 dated 27/08/2022). The study participants were informed about the purpose of the study, and informed consent was obtained. A total of 90 patients with DFU were selected purposively based on patient selection criteria. Patients who are diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) living with DFU were included in the study. Patients who were critically ill during hospitalisation were excluded.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated with a 95% confidence interval and a 9% margin of error. The following formula was used to calculate the sample size. n = ( Z 1 α / 2 σ E ) 2

Z1 – α/2=1.96, σ =6.29, E=9% (margin error)

The data collection tools used were demographic proforma, clinical proforma, psychological general well-being scale, and brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (COPE) Inventory.

Demographic variables: It includes nine items: age, gender, education, marital status, occupation, type of family, dietary pattern, place of residence, and monthly income for the family.

Clinical proforma: It includes type of DM, duration of DM, history of amputation, type of treatment for DFU, any other co-morbidities, history of psychiatric illness, hours of sleep, and degree of ulcer. Wagner’s classification of diabetic foot assesses different degrees of ulceration in the foot.

Psychological general well-being scale: This scale is a measure of subjective experience of psychological well-being that determines an individual’s emotional state.[12] This is a standardised 6-point scale consisting of 22 items that measure the psychological well-being of an individual. The sub-areas of the scale are anxiety, depression, positive well-being, self-control, general health, and vitality. The score of the psychological general well-being scale ranges from 0-110. Higher scores indicate greater psychological well-being of an individual. The tool is interpreted as strong distress (1-60), moderate distress (60-69), state of no-distress (70-89), and ≥ 90 (State of positive well-being). Permission was obtained to utilise this psychological general well-being scale.

Brief-COPE questionnaire: It consists of 28 self-reported items to measure the effective and ineffective ways to cope with troubling events, such as living with a DFU. This tool was developed by Carver and is available in the public domain.[13] The domains of the tool are problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, and avoidant coping. Problem-focused coping is active coping with the use of informational support, proper planning, and positive reframing. A higher score indicates developing coping strategies that are aimed at adjusting to the new challenges in life. Emotion-focused coping comprises venting emotions, using emotional support from family members, and accepting challenges. A high score indicates the developing coping strategies to regulate emotions associated with challenging situations in life. Avoidant coping is the avoidance of the situation and adopting self-distraction, denial, substance use, and behavioural disengagement. A higher score indicates physical or cognitive efforts developed by the individual to disengage from the stressful situation in life.

Validation and reliability of the data collection tools: All the tools were given for validation to the experts in the field of nursing, and suggestions were incorporated accordingly. The reliability (r-value) of the psychological general well-being scale was 0.84, and Brief COPE was 0.89, which indicates that the tools were reliable.

Statistical analysis: Demographic data, clinical proforma, psychological general well-being score, and brief COPE scores were analysed using descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Karl Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between psychological well-being and coping strategies. The Chi-square test was used to find the association between psychological well-being and coping strategies with selected demographic variables at a significance level <0.05.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with DFU

The majority of the patients were aged between 51-60 years (36.7%) and were males (87.8%). Majority of participants had secondary education (30.0%), and they were coolies by occupation (47.8%). The majority were married (91.1%) and belonged to nuclear families (56.7%). The majority of participants consume a mixed diet pattern (63.3%). The majority of participants belong to rural areas (63.3%), and 43.3% participants reported monthly income was between Rs.10,001-15,000.

The majority were type 2 DM (94.4%) patients living with DM for ≤5 years (30.0%) and between 6-10 years (30.0%) of age. The majority had no history of amputation in their family (54.4%), and 40.0% were receiving wound dressing treatment. The majority of participants didn’t have a family history of DM (61.1%) or psychiatric illness (95.6%). The majority of the participants had 7-8 hours of sleep (75.6%) at night [Table 1].

Table 1: Distribution of patients according to clinical proforma (n=90)
Sr.No. Clinical proforma f (%)
1 Type of DM
a) Type 1 DM 05(05.6)
b) Type 2 DM 85(94.4)
2 Duration of DM
a) ≤5 years 27(30.0)
b) 6-10 years 27(30.0)
c) 11-15 years 16(17.8)
d) >15 years 19(21.1)
3 History of amputation
a) Yes 41(45.6)
b) No 49(54.4)
4 Type of treatment
a) Wound debridement 35(38.9)
b) Negative wound pressure therapy 19(21.1)
c) Wound dressing 36(40.0)
5 Any other co-morbidities
a) Hypertension 29(32.2)
b) Cardiovascular disease 07(07.8)
c) No co-morbidities 54(60.0)
6 Family history of DM
a) Yes 35(38.9)
b) No 55(61.1)
7 History of psychiatric illness
a) Yes 04(04.4)
b) No 86(95.6)
8 Hours of sleep
a) ≤6 hours 21(23.3)
b) 7-8hours 68(75.6)
c) >8 hours 01(75.6)

The data represented is the frequency (f) with the percentage (%) in parentheses of the distribution of study participants based on their clinical characteristics. DM: Diabetes mellitus.

The degree of diabetic wounds is categorised based on the Wagner classification. The majority (45.6%) had a grade 2 diabetic wound with an exposed tendon, 36.7% with superficial ulcers, 13.3% with ulcers involving bone, and 4.4 % with forefoot gangrene.

Assessment of psychological well-being among diabetic foot ulcer patients

The psychological general well-being scale assessed the psychological well-being of patients. The results showed that 43(47.8%) of patients with DFU had strong distress, 20 (22.2%) had moderate distress, 20(22.2%) had a state of no distress, and 07(7.8%) had positive well-being.

Assessment of coping among patients with DFU

The mean score of problem-focused coping was 18.29 ± 4.19, emotional-focused coping was 28.58 ± 5.71, and avoidant-focused coping was 13.08 ± 4.21.

Correlation between psychological well-being and coping strategies

There was a negative correlation between psychological well-being and problem-focused coping strategies (p=0.03), as well as psychological well-being and avoidant-focused coping strategies (p=0.01). It indicates that active and cognitive efforts in coping lead to positive psychological well-being among patients [Table 2].

Table 2: Correlation between psychological well-being and coping strategies (n=90).
Sl. No. Study variables Statistical value
r p
1

Psychological wellbeing

Problem-focused coping

-0.22 0.03*
2

Psychological wellbeing

Emotional-focused coping

-0.18 0.08
3

Psychological wellbeing

Avoidant focused

-0.34 0.01**

The statistical test used was the Karl-Pearson correlation coefficient. *Significant at p<0.05.

Association between psychological well-being and selected demographic variables

There was a significant association of psychological well-being with age (p=0.022) and monthly income (p=0.031) in patients with DFU [Table 3].

Table 3: Association between psychological well-being and selected demographic variables (n=90).

Sl.

No

Demographic variables Median
χ2 value p-value
<60 ≥60
1 Age (in years)
a) 20-30 - - 9.641 0.022*
b) 31-40 05 03
c) 41-50 16 06
d) 51 -60 18 15
e) 61 and above 08 19
2 Gender
a) Male 40 03 0.654 0.419
b) Female 07 04
3 Educational status
a) No formal education 08 05 3.768 0.288
b) Primary education 14 11
c) Secondary education 16 11
d) PUC and above 09 16
4 Occupation
a) Coolie 25 18 1.966 0.580
b) Private 10 14
c) Government 02 01
d) Housewife /no work 10 10
5 Marital status
a) Married 41 41 2.494 0.287
b) Unmarried 04 02
c) Widow/Widower 02 -
6 Type of Family
a) Nuclear family 23 28 3.744 0.154
b) Joint family 19 14
c) Separated family 05 01
7 Dietary pattern
a) Vegetarian 17 16 0.010 0.919
b) Non-vegetarian - -
c) Mixed 30 27
8 Residence
a) Rural 19 14 0.599 0.439
b) Urban 28 29
9 Monthly income (in rupees)
a) ≤10000 23 11 6.979 0.031*
b) 10001-15000 19 20
c) >15001 5 12

The statistical test used was the chi-square test. Level of significance: p< 0.05.

Significant p-value <0.05. PUC: Pre-University course.

Association between coping strategies and selected demographic variables

A significant association was found between emotional coping strategies with the type of family (p=0.006). There was no association between problem-focused coping strategies and the demographic variables. Avoidant coping strategy was associated with age (p=0.021). Hence, it indicates that age and family support are important for coping with stressful life events.

DISCUSSION

The present study showed that most of the patients diagnosed with diabetic foot had distress regarding their health status and treatment outcomes. It is important to recognise the psychological status among patients with DFUs and how they cope with stressful situations. Few previously published studies revealed that the co-existence of depression and anxiety among diabetic foot patients is more compared to other diabetic patients [14-16], and treatment for diabetic ulcers aids in reducing patients’ stress.[17-18] Maheshwari et al. reported a significant association between diabetes, DFUs, and psychological distress.[19]

Coping style is an important strategy to maintain the healthy psychological status of an individual during stressful life situations. It helps in improving adaptability when an individual experiences difficulties and challenges in life. Different coping styles, such as confrontation coping, giving up coping, spiritual coping, and avoidance coping, have an impact on an individual’s emotional and mental health status.[20] A qualitative study reported that most of the patients with DFU were afraid of losing their feet and found difficulties in coping with the current situation due to multiple factors. To better understand the needs and problems of patients, healthcare workers should work with these patient groups to educate them in self-care management.[21] However, many patients adopt different kinds of coping strategies to overcome the current situation. Hidayah et al. revealed a patient living with DFU adopting positive spiritual coping.[22]

The quality of life of patients with DFU was negatively correlated with self-stigma but positively correlated with social support and giving up coping styles. Social support involves various social interactions, including information support and spiritual support given to patients. It can reduce patients’ stress and significantly improve social and psychological well-being, thus improving their quality of life. In addition, social support is one of the most important resources in the management of disease, ensuring patient compliance. Social support could be obtained from family, friends, and other people to help them overcome the challenges in life. The higher the utilisation of social support, the better the overall living status of patients.[23]

The present study results showed an association between emotional coping strategies and type of family (p=0.006). Perceived family support is the main factor affecting diabetes management and improving self-care behaviours. Problem-focused coping style helps to identify the needs of patients and manage the situation.[23] The present study revealed that there is a negative correlation between psychological well-being and coping strategies. Psychological well-being is significantly co-related with problem-focused and avoidant-focused coping strategies. People with DFUs need clinical intervention techniques to develop healthy coping mechanisms to maintain their quality of life.[22] Assuring emotional, social, and psychological support to patients effective actions are necessary to help them cope with the challenges of living with DFUs.[24] The present study showed a significant association between psychological well-being and age. Evidence suggests that the physical aspects of quality of life decline with advanced age, but mental health remains stable across age categories and may even improve in patients with advanced age.[25,26] A study conducted in South India also supports the necessity of developing multiple strategies for diabetic patients to prevent complications.[27] Patients with DM should be screened for psychological and other factors regularly during their visits to diabetic clinics.[28] The present study helps future researchers to understand and develop strategies for managing distress and adopting effective coping strategies. This study has certain limitations, including data collection from a single setting at a single point in time, and no follow-up was made to understand patients’ coping abilities. Hence, this study recommends replication on a larger sample size, including multiple settings, among caregivers and patients with DFUs. Intervention studies, including counselling sessions for those with moderate to severe distress to improve psychological well-being, can be conducted.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that patients with diabetic feet were in strong distress. A negative correlation existed between psychological well-being and coping strategies such as problem-focused coping and avoidant-focused coping. The study highlights the need for behavioural therapies and counselling in adopting coping strategies to manage their emotions and actions in every stage of life.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank all the participants for their support and cooperation in conducting this study.

Ethical approval

The research/study approved by the Yenepoya Ethics Committee 2 at Yenepoya Deemed to be University, number YEC2/1049, dated 27th August 2022.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

REFERENCES

  1. , . Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:2932-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . A review on contemporary nanomaterial-based therapeutics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) with special reference to the indian scenario. Nanoscale Adv. 2022;4:2367-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The current burden of diabetic foot disease. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;17:88-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . The development and complications of diabetic foot ulcers. Am J Surg. 1998;176:11S-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. The association between history of diabetic foot ulcer, perceived health and psychological distress: Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. BMC Endocr. 2009;9:18.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Patient perspectives on the physical, psycho-social, and financial impacts of diabetic foot ulceration and amputation. J Diabetes Complications. 2021;35:107960.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Profiles of psychological well-being and coping strategies among university students. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1554.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:377-401.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Patients’ perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:191-206.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. . Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosom Med. 1993;55:234-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: Qualitative systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66:e114-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , . Psychological general wellbeing index (PGWB) In: , ed. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Brandon (Canada): Springer; . p. :5152-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4:92-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Anxiety and depression among adult patients with diabetic foot: Prevalence and associated factors. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10:411-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Predictors of quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: The role of anxiety, depression, and functionality. J Health Psychol. 2018;23:1488-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Anxiety, depression and their associated risk factors among patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A two center cross-sectional study in Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15:237-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . High levels of anxiety and depression in diabetic patients with charcot foot. J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7:22.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Coping style and depression influence the healing of diabetic foot ulcers: Observational and mechanistic evidence. Diabetologia. 2010;53:1590-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Study on health outcomes in diabetic patients-association between diabetic foot ulcer and psychological distress. Rese. Jour. of Pharm. and Technol.. 2017;10:44.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , . Relationships among social support, coping style, self‐stigma, and quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A multicentre, cross‐sectional study. Int Wound J. 2023;20:716-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: a qualitative meta‐synthesis. Int. Wound J. 2019;16:183-210.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Description of spiritual coping in patients with diabetic foot ulcer at the wound care clinic in Makassar city. Indonesian Contemporary Nursing Journal.. 2020;5:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Measuring caregiver activation to identify coaching and support needs: Extending MYLOH to advanced chronic illness. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205153.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Relationship between perceived social support and self-care behavior in type 2 diabetics: A cross-sectional study. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:48.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Foot care, ‘spousal’ support and type 2 diabetes: An exploratory qualitative study. Psychol Health. 2018;33:1191-1207.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . Associations between chronic disease, age and physical and mental health status. Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29:108-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Understanding the dynamic relationship of diabetes distress and glycemic indicators in foot ulcer patients: A correlative study. Cureus. 2024;16:e57328.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Psychological predictors of adherence to self-care behaviour amongst patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) visiting public hospital, north India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2022;26:558-64.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections