Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
4 (
1
); 15-20
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703724

Relevance Of Measurement Of Hematological Parameters In Subjects With Pregnancy Induced Hypertension

Department of Physiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka, INDIA
Department of Physiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka, INDIA
Department of Physiology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka, INDIA

Correspondence: Subbalakshmi N.K. Associate Professor, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University Light House Hill Road, Mangalore-575001, Karnataka, India. E-mail: rao.subbalakshmink@rediffmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background

The pregnancy induced hypertensive (PIH) mothers are at greater risk for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and intrauterine death of foetus (IUD). But currently there are no suitable early indicators of PIH mothers at risk of IUGR and IUD.

Aims/objectives

To assess the various routinely measured hematological parameters in assessment of PIH mothers at risk of IUGR and IUD.

Methods

This was a retrospective study done in singleton mothers. Study Group: 75 subjects with PIH. They were divided in to: Group A (n=35): PIH subjects with IUGR and IUD. Group B (n=40): PIH subjects without IUGR and IUD. Controls: 62 normotensives. Blood parameters measured were: platelets, packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), differential leucocyte count. Statistical analysis was done by ANOVA and Bonferroni test. P<0.05 was taken as significant.

Results

Among the measured blood parameters, platelet count was lower in group A and group B compared to control (p<0.0001). Platelets were also lower in group A compared to group B (p<0.0001). Hemoglobin and PCV were lower in group A compared to controls and group B (p<0.001). Monocytes and ESR were lower in group A and group B compared to controls (p<0.05, p<0.001 respectively). Neutrophils were lower in group A compared to control (p<0.05). Other pairwise comparisons did not differ significantly.

Conclusions

Platelet count may be a suitable marker in monitoring subjects with PIH at risk of IUGR and IUD. Anemia may be associated with IUD and IUGR in PIH patients.

Keywords

Pregnancy induced hypertension
platelet count
hemoglobin
packed cell volume

Introduction :

The hypertensive disorders during pregnancy affect up to 8.0% of all pregnancies (1) and remain a major cause of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. (2 and 3) In women with pre-eclampsia, a history of symptoms is obtained antenatally, with the key alarming clinical symptoms being headache, vomiting, visual disturbances and epigastric pain. However the unpredictable onset and progression of these symptoms warrants the need for an early and appropriate detection. (4)

The association between proteinuria and pre-eclampsia has long been established and its presence is diagnostic of the disease and is indicative of its multisystem nature leading to maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. (5, and 6) However, recent studies on pre-eclampsia with varying levels of proteinuria have pointed out that estimation of levels of proteinuria in women with pre-eclampsia do not correlate with maternal and foetal outcomes. (7 and 8) Thus urinary protein estimation may not be a clinically useful predictive test, disputing the practice of deciding on delivery based on the severity of proteinuria.

Over the years, a lot of interest has been directed at studies on the role of serum uric acid, urea and creatinine in the pathogenesis of pregnancy induced hypertension. (9 and10) At the same time hypertensive disorders account for 21% of cases of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy (11) and the risk of anemia may also increase with the severity of hypertensive disorders. (12) Thus, though the roles of serum urea, uric acid and creatinine have been studied by many researchers, (13) there is a constant ongoing search for better predictors and prognostic factors to assess the progress and severity of the disease, hematological parameters being one among them. (14) Currently there are no individual screening tests that are reliable, valid, and economical. (15) With this background of knowledge, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the relevance of routinely done renal functions and hematological parameters in assessment of pregnancy induced hypertension.

Materials And Methods :

The present study was a retrospective, descriptive type. It was carried out at the Lady Goschen Hospital, Mangalore. Study was done in eligible pregnancy induced hypertensive singleton mothers of whom relevant medical reports were available until they were discharged from the hospital after delivery.

Study subjects : 140 consecutive eligible cases were enrolled into the study. They were divided into two groups: 1. study group: Comprised of 75 subjects with pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and 2. Control group: Comprised of 65 normotensive mothers. The study group was further subdivided into:

Group A (n = 35): PIH subjects with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and intra uterine death of the foetus (IUD).

Group B (n= 40): PIH subjects without IUGR and IUD of foetus.

Inclusion criteria: 1) Booked cases; 2) 25-35 years; 3) No history of hypertension in the past from twentieth week.

Exclusion criteria: 1) Subjects suffering from hemorrhagic diseases; 2) Thromboembolic episodes; 3) Epileptics; 4) on long term treatment with steroids, anticoagulants.

The following parameters were assessed: Hematological parameters: platelets, packed cell volume (PCV), hemoglobin, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), total leucocyte count (TLC) and differential leucocyte count (DLC). Renal function parameters: serum urea, serum uric acid, serum creatinine, and urine protein. Apart from measurement of these parameters, random blood sugar, body mass indexes (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure were noted.

Data analysis: Analysis of one way analysis followed by multiple comparisons (Bonferroni test) was applied. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results :

Data is presented as mean ± Standard deviation (SD). Comparison of baseline characteristics of control group (n = 62) and subgroups of study subjects (Group A: PIH mothers with IUGR and IUD of foetus (n = 40); Group B : PIH mothers without IUGR and IUD of foetus (n =35) is presented in table 1. The control group, group A and group B was comparable with regard to age, body mass index and random blood sugar. Blood pressure and urine protein was significantly higher in group A and group B compared to control (p < 0.001, table1).

Among the renal function parameters measured, serum creatinine did not differ significantly among the subjects of group A, group B and control (table 2). Serum urea was significantly higher in group B compared to control (p < 0.0001) and group A (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum urea between group A and control (table 2). Serum Uric acid was significantly higher in group A and group B compared to control (p<0.0001). Serum urea of group A and group B did not differ significantly (table 2).

Total leucocyte count was significantly higher in group A and group B compared to control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 respectively, table 3). Total leucocyte count did not differ significantly between group A and group B (table 3). Neutrophil count was significantly lower in group A compared to control (p<0.05). Neutrophil count did not differ between control and group B. Neutrophil count was comparable between group A and group B. Monocyte count was significantly lower in group A and group B compared to control (p<0.05). Monocyte count did not differ significantly between group A and group B. Eosinophil count did not differ significantly between control and study subjects (table 3). Basophil count was higher in group B compared to control. Basophil count of group A did not vary compared to control and group B (table 3).

Table 1
Data on baseline characteristics of pregnancy induced hypertensive and control subjects (Values are: Mean ± SD)

Parameters

Control (n = 65)

PIH with normal foetus Group B (n= 40)

PIH with IUGR and IUD of foetus

Group A (n= 35)

AGE (years)

28.01 ± 4.48

29.9 ± 3.50 NS

29.91± 4.18 NS

BMI (kg/m2)

25.09± 2.50

26.63 ± 2.64 NS

25.65 ±2.95 NS

SBP (mmHg)

117.58 ± 6.93

158 ± 7.90 ***

159.71± 8.57 ***

DBP (mmHg)

72.74 ± 4.84

98 ± 5.16 ***

100.28 ± 8.21 ***

Urine Protein

5.5 ± 1.04

7.08 ± 1.56 ***

6.76 ± 1.51***

Random blood sugar (mg %)

102.61 ± 21.43

113.9 ± 30.37 NS

115.31 ± 27.725 NS

NS = Non-significant compared to control; Non -significant group A compared to group

B

*** p < 0.0001 compared to control

PIH = Pregnancy induced hypertension; IUGR = intrauterine growth restriction;

IUD = Intrauterine death; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP= diastolic blood pressure;

BMI = Body Mass Index

Table 2
Renal parameters - serum levels in control and study subjects (Values are Mean ± SD)

Parameters

Control (n = 65)

PIH With normal foetus

PIH With IUGR AND IUD

Group B (n= 40)

Group A (n = 35)

Creatinine (mg%)

0.61 ± 0.15

0.67± 0.18 NS

0.64 ± 0.19 NS

Urea (mg%)

16.75± 11.56

27.5 ± 16.26 ***

19.17 ± 12.98 *NS

Uric acid

4.34 ± 1.61

5.83 ± 1.61 ‡‡‡

6.46 ± 1.76 ‡‡‡

***P < 0.0001 compared to control; * p < 0.05 compared to group B

‡‡‡ p <0.0001 compared to control. NS= non-significant compared to control. IUGR = intrauterine growth retardation; IUD = intrauterine death.

Table 3
Hematological parameters in control and study subjects (values are mean ± SD)

Parameters

Control (n = 65)

PIH With normal foetus Group B (n= 40)

PIH With IUGR and IUD of foetus Group A (n = 35)

PCV

31.49± 4.08

31.42± 2.72 NS

28.01 ± 3.79 **

Hemoglobin

10.8 ± 2.72

11.39 ± 1.54 NS

8.54 ± 3.06 **

ESR

38.04± 21.93

57.87 ± 23.35 †

51.02 ± 25.84 ††

Platelets

204161.29 ± 71998.45

121625 ± 90055.44 ††

106971.4286 ± 89998.52 **

TLC

10429.83± 2828.37

12679 ± 3825.07 ‡

13248.85± 5528.81‡‡

Neutrophils

74.69 ± 7.41

77.87± 9.51 NS

79 ± 7.63 *

Lymphocytes

19.12± 7.57

17.82 ± 7.87 NS

21.37 ± 7.66 NS

Monocytes

0.45± 0.50

0.82± 0.84*

0.91± 0.81 *

Eosinophils

0.93 ± 0.97

0.75 ± 0.89 NS

0.94 ± 0.68 NS

Basophils

0.419 ± 0.5

0.675 ± 0.61*

0.6 ± 0.55 NS

PCV = Packed Cell Volume

ESR = Erythrocytes Sedimentation Rate

TLC = Total Leucocyte Count

** p < 0.001 compared to control and PIH with normal foetus (group B)

† p < 0.05 compared to control ; * p < 0.05 compared to control

† † p < 0.01 compared to control

‡ p < 0.05 compared to control

‡ ‡ p < 0.01 Compared to control; NS = Compared to control

PCV and hemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in group A compared to group B and control (p < 0.001). PCV and hemoglobin concentration did not differ significantly between control and group B (table 3).

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was significantly higher in group A and group B compared to control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05 respectively, table 3). ESR did not differ significantly between group A and group B (table 3).

Platelet count was significantly lower in group A and group B compared to control (p<0.001, p<0.01 respectively, table 3). Platelet count was significantly lower in group A compared to group B (p<0.001, table 3).

Discussion :

Pregnancy induced hypertension is associated with greater risk of IUGR and IUD of foetus. But currently there are no suitable indicators in monitoring the progression of PIH leading to IUGR and IUD of foetus. We evaluated the relevance of measurement of renal function and hematological parameters in PIH mothers.

In the present study, systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in study subjects compared to control (table 1). But blood pressure of study subjects with normal foetus did not vary compared to PIH mothers with IUGR and IUD of foetus. Our finding is in agreement with the findings of Cnossen et al. who also have observed that

systolic and diastolic blood pressures are poor predictors of pre-eclampsia. (16) However in their study pre-eclampsia was considered unlike PIH mothers with IUGR and IUD of foetus in our study.

In the present study, urine protein was significantly higher in study subjects compared to control (table 1). But study subjects with and without IUGR and IUD of foetus were comparable with regard to urine protein. This finding suggests that although raised protein is a characteristic feature of PIH, this parameter may not be involved in the progression of pathogenesis of PIH leading to IUGR and IUD of foetus. Lao TT et al and Newman MG et al too did not find correlation between estimation of levels of proteinuria with maternal and foetal outcome in women with preeclampsia. (6 and 7) Our finding is in agreement with the findings of Lao TT et al and Newman MG et al.

In the present study, serum uric acid was significantly higher in study subjects compared to control (table 2). However, serum uric acid level was comparable between PIH subjects with and without IUGR and IUD of foetus (table 2). Findings of previous research work on association between uricemia and PIH is conflicting. Wake VC et al have observed that in subjects with pre-eclampsia plasma uric acid level will help to predict those that will develop eclampsia. (17) Hawkins A et al have reported that hyperuricemia in hypertensive pregnancy remains an important finding because it identifies women at increased risk of adverse foetal outcome even women with gestational hypertension without any other features of pre-eclampsia. (18) In the study of Mustaphi R et al, high positive correlation was observed between levels of serum uric acid and severity of PIH in relation to hypertension and proteinuria. (19) However, Hickman PE et al have noted serum uric acid as an unreliable indicator of developing hypertension in the individual women. (20) Salako ABL et al have reported that single estimation of serum uric acid level early in pregnancy are of little value in the prediction of pre-eclampsia. (21) However, our study finding suggests that with PIH, uric acid metabolism may get impaired but it may not be linked with pathogenesis of the disorder

leading to IUGR and IUD of foetus.

In the present study total leucocyte count was higher in PIH mothers with or without IUGR and IUD of foetus compared to normotensive mothers (table 3). Monocyte count was significantly higher in PIH mothers irrespective of having IUGR and IUD of foetus compared to control (table 3). Neutrophil count was higher in PIH mothers with IUGR and IUD of foetus compared to control (table 3). Canzoneri BJ et al too have observed increase in total leucocyte count in PIH mothers. But in their study monocyte count did not vary between mothers with and without PIH. (22) Pregnancy induced hypertension is a multisystem disorder and may involve inflammatory response. (23) Thus variation in leucocyte count especially of neutrophils and monocytes observed in our study could be one of the clinical manifestations of underlying PIH pathogenesis. However, Sivakumar S et al have not observed any difference in total leucocyte count and differential neutrophil count in PIH mothers compared to normotensive mothers. (14) In the present study, total leucocyte count and differential leucocyte count did not differ between PIH mothers with and without IUGR and IUD of foetus (table 3). Therefore it could be said that total and differential leucocyte count may not be a reliable marker in monitoring PIH subjects at greater risk for adverse foetal outcome.

In the present study, hemoglobin concentration and PCV did not differ significantly between normotensive mothers and PIH mothers with normal foetus. But PIH mothers with IUGR and IUD of foetus had significantly lower hemoglobin concentration and PCV compared to control and PIH mothers with normal foetus (table 3). This finding suggests that anemia is an associated risk factor for IUGR and IUD of foetus in PIH mothers. Maternal anemia is a common pregnancy complication in developing countries. Zhang et al have reported that the risk of anemia increases with the severity of hypertensive disorders. (24) Therefore monitoring PCV and hemoglobin concentration may aid in better management of PIH mothers at risk of IUGR and IUD of foetus.

In the present study, platelet count was within normal range in normotensive mothers. But platelet count was lower in PIH mothers with or without IUGR and IUD of foetus compared to normotensive mothers. Further, platelet count was much lower in PIH mothers with IUGR and IUD of foetus compared to PIH mothers with normal foetus (table 3). Thus a decline in platelet count was associated with severity of PIH progressing to IUGR and IUD of foetus. Hypertensive disorders accounts for 21% of cases of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy (11) Nazli R et al too have reported high frequency of thrombocytopenia in PIH mothers. (25) In their study the severity of thrombocytopenia was proportional to the severity of pregnancy related hypertensive disorders. (25) In the study of Rahim et al 74.28 % of low birth weight babies were observed in PIH mothers with thrombocytopenia. (26) In the study by Hossain et al thrombocytopenia was associated with a higher prevalence of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation; and was also found to be an independent and important risk factor in the occurrence of maternal and perinatal complications in pregnancy related hypertensive disorders. (27) Our findings along with the observations of previous workers support the relevance of monitoring platelet count in PIH mothers especially at greater risk of adverse foetal outcome.

Thus based on our study findings, it could be concluded that among the hematological parameters measured, platelet count may be a suitable marker in monitoring subjects with PIH at risk of IUGR and IUD of foetus. Reduced hemoglobin and packed cell volume may be associated with IUGR and IUD of foetus in PIH mothers. Proteinuria, uricemia, higher ESR, higher total leucocyte count, higher neutrophil, monocyte and basophil counts are associated with PIH but does not reflect on PIH mothers at risk of IUGR and IUD of foetus.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST: No conflict of interest

References:

  1. , . Management of the obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;38:521-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. Iinternational edn 2001:567-618. chp-34
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , , , . Neonatal outcome in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev. 2011;87((6)):445-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Pathophysiology of the Clinical Manifestations of Preeclampsia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:543-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . The kidney in toxemia of pregnancy: a clinical and pathologic study based on renal biopsies. Medicine (Baltimore). 1960;39:469-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . The significance of proteinuria in preeclampsia; proteinuria associated with low birth weight only in preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1988;29((2)):121-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Perinatal outcomes in preeclampsia that is complicated by massive proteinuria. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;188((1)):264-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , . Estimation of proteinuria as a predictor of complications of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. BMC Medicine. 2009;7(10)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. . Plasma concentration of urate, urea and creatinine in Nigerian primigravidae with pre-eclampsia. Trop Geogr Med. 1986;38:11-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Hyperuricemia and pregnancy induced hypertension-reappraisal. Indian J Med Sci. 1996;50:68-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Gestational thrombocytopenia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;42:327-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Prevalence and risk factors for anaemia in pregnant women: a population-based prospective cohort study in China. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol.. 2009;23((4)):282-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Elevated levels of serum uric acid, creatinine or urea in pre-eclamptic women. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2013;2((1)):43-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Effect of pregnancy induced hypertension on mothers and their babies. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74((7)):623-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . First-trimester prediction of early preeclampsia: a possibility at last! Hypertension. . 2009;53((5)):747-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , . Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;336:1117.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Estimation of plasma uric acid in pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) Is the test still relevant? Afr J Med Med Sci. 1999;28((3-4)):155-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , . Plasma uric acid remains a marker of poor outcome in hypertensive pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119((4)):484-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Hyperuricemia and pregnancy induced hypertension—reappraisal . Indian J Med Sci. 1996;50((3)):68-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , . Serum uric acid as a marker of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.. 1982;22((4)):198-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , . Serum albumin, creatinine, uric acid and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. East Afr Med J. 2003;80((8)):424-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , . Increased neutrophil numbers account for leukocytosis in women with preeclampsia. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26((10)):729-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. . Inflammatory response in preeclampsia. Mol Aspects Med. 2007;28((2)):210-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Prevalence and risk factors for anaemia in pregnant women: a population-based prospective cohort study in China. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23((4)):282-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , , . Frequency of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy related hypertensive disorders in patients presenting at tertiary care hospitals of Peshawar. Khyber Med Univ J. 2012;4((3)):101-105.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Platelet count in 100 cases of pregnancy induced hypertension. Mymensingh Med J.. 2010;19((1)):5-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Maternal and Perinatal Outcome of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy at a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Dow Univ Health Sci. 2011;5((1)):12-16.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections