Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2 (
02
); 14-17
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703564

Role of Nitric Oxide and Arginase in the Pathogenesis of Oral Cancer

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Department of Biochemistry, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Central Research Laboratory, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, India

Address for correspondence: Nidarsh D. Hegde, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore - 575 018, India E-mail: drhegdedental@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the status of serum nitric oxide and arginase activity in oral cancerous condition. The study consisted of 80 individuals. The subjects were divided into normal individuals and individuals with oral cancer. Blood sample was collected from each subject and serum separated. Nitric oxide concentration was measured as total nitrates and nitrites by the Griess reaction method and arginase activity was estimated by diacetylmonoxime method.

The results of this study showed significantly increased levels of nitric oxide and arginase activity in oral cancerous condition when compared to normal individuals. From the study it can be concluded that during carcinogenesis and tumor progression, the level of nitric oxide and arginase activity increases. This could result from a generalized increased nitric oxide synthesis throughout the body of the cancer patient or reflect increased nitric oxide degradation promoted by oxidative stress.

Keywords

Nitric oxide
Arginase
Oral Cancer

Introduction

Oral cancer is part of a group of cancers called head and neck cancer. Oral cancer can develop in any part of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Risk factors for oral cancer are tobacco, alcohol use, exposure to sunlight, chronic irritation, lack of fruits and vegetables in diet, alcohol containing mouth wash, human papilloma virus infection and immune system suppression1.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays multiple roles in both intracellular and extracellular signaling mechanisms. This highly reactive, yet simple molecule is produced in the body by the isoenzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS) using L-arginine as a substrate. Three isoforms of NOS have been characterized. Two of them are constitutive NOS (cNOS) and the third is inducible (iNOS) by endotoxins and cytokines2. Reaction of nitric oxide with oxygen or other free radicals generates reactive nitrogen species (RNS), which cause multiple biological effects3. Overexpression of NOS in chronic inflammation can lead to genotoxicity. Nitric oxide may mediate DNA damage through the formation of carcinogenic nitrosamines, generation of RNS and inhibition of DNA damage repair mechanism. It can thus be considered as a tumor initiating agent4. However, Nitric oxide may also have an impact on other stages of cancer development. These effects of nitric oxide are broad, with its involvement ranging from cellular transformation and formation of neoplastic lesions to the regulation of various other aspects of tumor biology26.

Inducible nitric oxide synthase is responsible for generating high levels of nitric oxide in tissues. Increased iNOS expression has been demonstrated in a number of carcinomas including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma79. Nitric oxide up regulates cyclo-oxygenase-2 and synthesis of several other inflammatory cytokines. Inflammation and thrombotic complication are usually associated with malignancy. Threshold levels of nitric oxide required for the activation and stabilization of key proteins involved in carcinogenesis including p53, ERK, AKt and HIF10.

L-Arginine is the common substrate for two enzymes, arginase and nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Arginase converts L-arginine to L-ornithine, which is the precursor of polyamines, which are essential components of cell proliferation. Arginase modulates nitric oxide production in activated macrophages. In macrophages and many other cell types, L-arginine is used as substrate by both nitric oxide synthase and arginase to produce nitric oxide and urea, respectively11. Arginase reflects the type of inflammatory response in a specific disease process. The availability of arginine during critical illness may be regulated by arginase activity. Thus arginase expression appears to be essential in the regulation of the cellular immune response and the inflammatory process during critical illness1214.

Materials and method

This study was conducted in the Central Research Laboratory of Nitte University after the approval from institutional ethical committee.

Subjects

The study involved 80 patients reporting to the Department of oral medicine and Radiology, A.B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences

Study group

Includes total of 60 subjects with oral cancer were included.

Control group

20 healthy adults without oral cancer were included.

Inclusion criteria

Patients between age group 20–60 years.

Include clinically diagnosed cases of oral submucous fibrosis and histopathologically confirmed cases of leukoplakia and erythroplakia.

Include clinically diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed cases of oral cancer.

Exclusion criteria

Subjectswith other systemic diseases.

Subjects taking any medications/antioxidant supplementation will not be included in the study.

A detailed case history of the patient was taken. A case history format was filled, with a informed consent which was duly signed by each patient.

Collection of serum

5ml of blood samples of the subjects was collected by vein puncture, centrifuged to separate the serum and stored at 4°C.

Estimation of Nitric oxide (NO2+NO3) concentration by Griess reaction method

Nitric oxide concentration was measured as total nitrates and nitrites (NO2+NO3) by the Griess reaction method. Absorbance is read at 550nm. Concentration is determined using standard graph.

Estimation of Arginase Activity by Diacetylmonoxime method

Diacetylmonoxime reacts with urea formed by arginase action under strongly acidic conditions in the presence of ferric ion and thiosemicarbazide giving a pink coloured diacetyl complex which is read spectrophotometrically at 540nm. Concentration is determined using standard graph.

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean + standard deviation value and statistically analyzed by Student ‘t’ test. A ‘p’ value of 0.05 or less was considered significant

Result

The present study involves the estimation of the levels of nitric oxide and arginase activity in oral cancerous condition and their comparison between diseased and normal individuals. The results are expressed in Table-1 and Fig-1, 2.

Table 1 Tablel: Comparison of serum nitric oxide levels and arginase activity in patients with oral cancer and normal individuals
NORMAL N=20 ORALCANCER N=60 ‘p’ VALUE
NITRIC OXIDE 40.57±11.82 93.68±49.60 0.0025
ARGINASE 5.844± 1.328 19.3±10.02 0.0130

‘p’<0.05 is statistically significant. Statistical comparisons were performed by Student ‘t’ test. Data are expressed as mean ±SD.

Comparison of serum nitric oxide levels in patients with oral cancer and normal individual
Figure 1
Comparison of serum nitric oxide levels in patients with oral cancer and normal individual
Comparison of serum arginase activity in patients with oral cancer and normal individuals
Figure 2
Comparison of serum arginase activity in patients with oral cancer and normal individuals

In this study nitric oxide level was found to be increased significantly (p=0.0025) in oral cancerous condition when compared to normal individuals. Similarly arginase activity was found to be increased significantly (p=0.0130) in oral cancerous condition when compared to normal individuals.

Discussion

Cancer is an undifferentiated mass of cell. Cancer occurs due to the failures of the mechanisms that usually control the growth and regulation of the cell. The losers of cellular regulation that give rise to most or all cases of cancer are due to genetic damage that is often accompanied with by influences of tumor promoting chemicals, hormones and some time viruses.

The role of nitric oxide (NO) is multidimensional. It functions as an intracellular messenger and is also implicated as a deleterious agent in various pathophysiological conditions including cancer, inflammatory conditions and autoimmune diseases. Chronic inflammation can lead to the production of NO, which in turn has the potential to mediate DNA damage directly, or indirectly through the generation of more persistent RNS15.

NOS activity has been detected in tumor cells of various histogenetic origins and has been associated with tumor grade, proliferation rate and expression of important signaling components associated with cancer development. NO pathway appears to play a key role in angiogenesis and spread in patients with head and neck cancer7. Increased iNOS expression and the generation of high NO levels might have role in oral squamous cell carcinoma development. Thus NO in cancer will have preformed therapeutic implications for the diagnosis and treatment of disease. The activation of iNOS or Arginase (or both) reflects the type of inflammatory response in a specific disease process8. Arginase converts the arginine to ornithine, which is nonprotein amino acid utilized by the tumor cells as nutrient for their growth16.

In this study nitric oxide level and arginase activity is found to be increased significantly in oral cancer patients when compared with healthy subjects. This shows that, elevated level of nitric oxide and arginase, are involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Since, arginase regulates the nitric oxide production, the level of increase in arginase may be higher compared to increase in nitric oxide level.

This indicates that both nitric oxide and arginase play a role during carcinogenesis and tumor progression.

Discussion

Our study showed that serum nitric oxide level and arginase activity is higher in oral cancerous condition when compared to normal individuals. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that during carcinogenesis and tumor progression, the level of nitric oxide and arginase activity increases. This could result from a generalized increased nitric oxide synthesis throughout the body of the cancer patient or reflect increased nitric oxide degradation promoted by oxidative stress. Thus indicates that both nitric oxide and arginase play a role during carcinogenesis and tumor progression.

References

  1. , , , , . Detection and Screening of Oral Cancer and Pre-cancerous Lesions. J Chin Med Assoc. 2009;72((5)):227-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Role of nitric oxide in tumor growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:4392-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Biological aspects of reactive nitrogen species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1411:385-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . The role of glutathione in the transport and catabolism of nitric oxide. FEBS Lett. 1996;382:223-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Potential genotoxicity of chronically elevated nitric oxide: a review. Mutat Res. 1995;339:73-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Evaluation of oxidative stress and nitric oxide levels patients with oral cavity cancer. Jpn J Clin O ncol pages. ;2002:379-385.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , . Role of nitric oxide in angiogenesis and tumor progression in head and neck cancer. . (1998)1998;90((24)):587-596.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Increased NO levels and iNOS over expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. oral oncology. ;41((3)):261-267.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . The role of nitric oxide in tumor progression. Nature reviews cancer. 2006;6:521-534.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. The Effect of Nitric Oxide on Cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) Overexpression in Head and Neck Cancer Cell Lines. Int. J. Cancer. ;107:729-738.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Arginase:a limiting factor for nitric oxide and polyamine synthesis by activated macrophages. Am J Physiol regulatory integrative comp physiol. 2000;279((6)):R2237-R2242.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Macrophage arginase promotes tumor cell growth and suppresses nitric oxide-mediated tumor Cytotoxicity. Cancer Res. 2001;61((3)):1100-1106.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Arginine and Immunity. J of Nutrition. ;2007:1681-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Arginase availability, arginase, and the immune response. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2003;6((2)):223-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Potential genotoxicity of chronically elevated nitric oxide: a review. Mutat Res. 1995;339:73-89.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , , . Differential regulation of nitric oxide synthase-2 and arginase-1 by type1/type2 cytokines in vivo. J. Immunol. 2001;167((11)):6533-6544.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections