Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/JHASNU_102_2025

Roles of Nurses in Palliative Care and Pain Management for Geriatrics With Colorectal Cancer: A Scoping Review for Quality Improvement

Department of Oncology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Department of Cardiology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

* Corresponding author: Dr. Jingbing Liu Department of Oncology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing 210028, Jiangsu, China. ljb0427@sina.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Wu Q, Zhou L, Lin Y, Liu J, Li L. Roles of Nurses in Palliative Care and Pain Management for Geriatrics With Colorectal Cancer: A Scoping Review for Quality Improvement. J Health Allied Sci NU. doi: 10.25259/JHASNU_102_2025

Abstract

Background and Aim

Colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients is a severe global concern, and palliative care provided by nurses is in high demand at the end-of-life stage. A review to address this critical and under-researched area is warranted, and hence, we chose this as our novel objective. This review will therefore help advance the overall knowledge on nursing education and palliative care by nurses in oncology settings for geriatrics with CRC.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were used as the search tools for the literature survey. The study adopted Arksey and O’Malley’s six-step framework, besides study identification through PRISMA-ScR flow, and adhered to Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE). A total of 18,859 articles were screened, and 65 articles were finalised for deriving the outcomes of the review.

Results

Nurses play a critical role in CRC via assisting in early detection, treatment, and improving survival. They must therefore be clinically competent. Also, experts in nursing science should take care of patients until the end of their lives at home, preferably addressing the physical needs of the patient. They must make decisions in palliative care provided to the patient and assist their family in the management and alleviation of symptoms, including pain.

Conclusion

Healthcare providers, such as nurses, can plan for caring for a cancer patient, providing mental and physical support in patient care. This will improve the overall survival of patients with limited adverse effects. Cancer rehabilitation evaluation to address the needs of elderly cancer patients must be utilised by nurses via several surveys and questionnaires. Hence, nursing education remains very important in cancer care for geriatrics.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer
Geriatrics
Nursing research
Palliative care
Survival

1. INTRODUCTION

According to 2024 projections, 1,52,810 new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and 53,010 deaths are estimated to occur in the United States. Although the survival rate for CRC has improved from 50% in 1975-77 to 64% in the 2013-2019 season, it still remains a global burden.[1] In addition, approximately 18% of these deaths occur among older adults in China (around 1.94 million deaths), and more than 68% of the total deaths are reported in China compared to the USA, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Although the incidence rate is lower in China, the mortality rate is higher among elderly Chinese people, with digestive cancer being one of the leading causes. Cancer treatment and/or management are necessary because the elderly population will be on the rise in the near future across the globe.[2] In 2020, the global CRC incidence was 44% higher in men than in women 2020 (23.4 cases in men compared to 16.2 affected women per 100,000 individuals). The patients were more prone to be affected in the colon than in the rectum, which later shifted to the proximal colon. Also, the incidence of CRC is higher in Afro-Americans, whereas Asians are more prone to rectal cancer.[3,4]

Common risk factors for CRC include familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.[5,6] It is interesting to note that more than 60% of CRC cases arise without familial history and changes in somatic mutations, copy number variations, or gene fusions, whereas the remaining percentage of CRC cases occur as a result of individuals becoming susceptible to hereditary constituents and environmental factors.[7] Loss of physical activity, increased body mass index,[8] poor dietary habits,[9] extreme intake of alcohol,[10] smoking (left colon in male and right colon in female smokers),[11] intestinal inflammation related to IBD, and gut microbiota[12] are established risk factors for CRC.

Nursing care remains pivotal in the management of cancer in affected individuals, and the knowledge on this issue is very limited. The problem associated with the limited volume of research conducted on nursing for palliative care among geriatrics with CRC remains perilous. This manuscript therefore deals with several aspects of cancer care and is one of the very few or novel of its kind about information on managing geriatrics with CRC by means of nursing.

SEARCH STRATEGY AND METHODS APPLIED

The review was prepared to establish the published works on nursing care for palliative care and pain management among geriatrics with CRC. PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were used as the search tools for the literature survey. The study adopted the Arksey and O’Malley’s six-step framework[13] and adhered to Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) for: (1) recognising the research questions; (2) classifying relevant studies; (3) choosing studies; (4) recording the data; (5) organising, summarising, and reporting the results; and (6) discussion exercises. The articles focused predominantly on articles published over the past 10 years for its discussion section. The following inclusion criteria were applied for articles used to prepare the review: (1) published in peer-reviewed scientific journals; (2) articles published in English; (3) focused on nursing-related articles; and (4) articles in which nursing focused on palliative care for CRC care in geriatrics.

Search terms in the survey sources were “The role of nurses in palliative care for elderly colorectal patients,” “palliative care by nurses,” “nursing education and CRC management,” and “nurses for caring patients with colorectal cancer.” The articles that did not focus on nursing and palliative care for geriatrics with CRC and those not published in English were excluded. Also, articles that were general on nursing care and palliative care for types of cancer other than CRC were also excluded. The impact of the review on older people with CRC alone was assessed. Overall, as shown in the PRISMA-ScR flow diagram [Figure 1],[14] 18,859 articles were screened (11,694 articles from PubMed, 7,142 articles from Web of Science, and 23 articles from Cochrane Library) using the search engines, and 78 articles were included and considered for deriving the outcomes based on their relevancy and suitability to the topic. Of these 78 selected articles based on the suitability for the topic, 13 articles were included in the introduction, besides including 24 research and meta-analyses, 37 reviews, two book chapters, and two randomised trials in the results and discussion (65 in total). The remaining articles were not included as they were not suitable for the title or core content of the article. The articles were predominantly sourced between the years 2010 to 2025, although some articles were from the previous few decades (articles published in the years 1990, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2006, and 2007). There are no full-scale randomised controlled or clinical trials (RCTs) specifically for the role of nurses in palliative care among geriatrics with CRC. Yet, there is a published audit and two pilot-scale RCTs on nursing-led follow-up through telephone intervention, involving geriatrics, along with young CRC patients, as mentioned above. Although PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines[15] were followed, the search terms were limited to a considerable extent, specific to the topic, which could improve the novelty of the work critically on palliative care by nursing in geriatrics with CRC.

Study identification PRISMA-ScR flow chart. PRISMA-ScR: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses -scoping reviews.
Figure 1:
Study identification PRISMA-ScR flow chart. PRISMA-ScR: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses -scoping reviews.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Nursing and palliative care for geriatrics with CRC

Knowledge of nurses and their roles in palliative care

A nurse with adequate knowledge of palliative care can assist in attending to a patient and their needs at the initial or critically ill stages. This can make a nurse decide on the specific needs of the patient, design, conduct, and evaluate therapeutic and non-medical interventions efficiently. Interestingly, nurses without technical knowledge of medicine can understand the processes and mechanisms and assist in pain management after certain years of experience. Hence, patient experience matters and must be given more attention in addition to technical knowledge, which can help a nurse serve the patient better. Therefore, interactions between physicians and nurses remain important for the successful implementation of this non-medical intervention. Some nurses might be unaware of the volume of pain experienced by patients; therefore, consistent training programs must be provided at regular intervals, which can aid in better palliative care.[16] The institute or hospital must assist nurses in reaching this task and in successful medical or nonmedical interventions with a positive attitude. In this regard, occupational hazards and harassment must be avoided to improve the safety of nurses in the workplace.[17]

Nurses with a master’s degree or a PhD can offer innovative practices based on the preferences of cancer patients and educate them as scientists. They can educate people at risk of cancer about the hazards associated with smoking and obesity, as well as expose the environmental and occupational risks in their locality. In this way, they can help provide ideas about preventing cancer, disease incidence, and occurrence, in addition to establishing treatment outcomes. In this regard, higher education in nursing, such as a doctoral degree, seems fruitful in providing novel options for therapy. This may also aid the early detection of cancer in the process of improved survival and/or terminal life care. Knowledge of certain types of cancer, and creating awareness about it, has helped give significant outcomes in several low- and middle-income countries. In this way, nurses can help patients die peacefully and aid their families in coping with the loss.[18]

Nursing care after palliative resection, which is deemed successful in patients with severe postoperative symptoms, seems effective when the patient’s quality of life is poor.[19] In addition, palliative resection can improve patient symptoms, increase comfort, and improve survival rates, while cancer is localised to a primary site and at distant sites to a certain extent. It is important to note that non-resection surgery does not provide significant relief from symptoms.[20] In this case, inputs from a nurse can be efficient in influencing changes at work while traveling and in communal life. In general, a nurse who is engaged in educating the patient and caregivers about the pre-operative procedures can improve the postoperative outcome concurrently.[21]

Moreover, conversations through telephone calls can improve patient care and survival even after 6 months when the length of hospice care provided to terminally ill patients is limited. Patients with higher symptom burden showed more interest in conversations with nurses, and the interventions were flexible.[22] Nurses help patients cope with the fear of the cost of therapy, as they feel guilty of the burden experienced by their family, and patients who are anxious feel that their lives are less worthy.[23] In short, patients with an early diagnosis using biomarkers have successful surgical interventions and better palliative care.[24] Thus, assessment of patient care by nurses is feasible and improves the quality of their life, as suggested by clinical studies on patients with CRC.[25-27]

An interesting study found that role-play, card games, digital games, board games, reflection games, and experimental games were effective in palliative care training.[28] The duration of palliative care is critical, along with the right dosage at the precise timing of treatment. Three months of palliative care is not enough for most patients, and therefore, prolonged care is required.[29] The spiritual dimension of care is another criterion to be considered by nurses during palliative care.[30] Collaborative care-taking via adaptive leisure nursing has the capacity to improve self-care, psychological, and psychosocial well-being of older people with CRC.[31] Query by nursing revealed that patients anticipated the facts on their survival time, to expect their way to the choice of the second line of treatment.[32] Although the patients wanted more information on their likelihood of cure, side effects, and predicted outcome, patients were allowed access to review a booklet and a video over a period of 2 weeks. Yet, it did not provide any positive output on the recovery expectation of a CRC patient, which could be studied further through related methods.[33]

Nursing and pain management

Pain is an established phenomenon in geriatric cancer patients and is often left untreated.[34] Pain management in older patients is often less frequent than expected to the required standard. The percentage of pain endured by a patient increases from approximately 40% at the treatment stage to approximately 70% at the terminal stage. Excessive medication can expose the elderly to unwanted side effects; however, limitations in medical management can result in psychological complications associated with depression. Older patients believe that pain is associated with age and is not a concern. Most patients ignored the pain linked with the use of analgesics and tried hard to maintain their integrity and freedom. To reduce pain, a self-report of pain based on a scale of 0-10 and a previous medical or pathological history must be reviewed. Furthermore, behavioural assessments (for example, non-verbal modes such as crying or yelling) must be noted. Later, inputs from caregivers, including nurses, should be received, and analgesics may be suggested for managing pain. Pain often leads to quarantined behaviour of the patient and enduring feelings and thoughts of loneliness. In such cases, patients could be given options, such as pill boxes, to take daily medicine without any hindrance or assistance.[35]

The most common or major cause of pain in older people is related to therapeutic interventions (> 80%). Pain is more frequently associated with the lower body and pelvis. Pain endurance is assessed daily and must be addressed at all times possible by healthcare providers and caregivers, including nurses. Neuropathic pain may be due to hyperalgesia and responses to causes other than pain, such as allodynia, in which pain memory is witnessed. Therefore, peripheral neuropathy can be either associated with cancer or not linked to it. Sympathetic pain in the hands, chest, head, and neck may be caused by allodynia, hyperpathia, or hypoalgesia. Changes in posture can also be used to identify the nociceptive pain associated with drug use. Besides, cancer patients exhibit behavioural changes with enhanced anxiety and depression. Patients will have low confidence, intense thoughts of negativity, enhanced dependence on external inputs, and be emotionally down.[36]

Nurses must be aware that more than 80% of patients with cancer-related pain have around two to four symptoms on average. Nurses must first consider the ability of the patient to manage pain, assess it, and identify the cause. Additionally, nurses should provide medicines based on their efficacy, ensure effective pain control, and provide personalised therapy based on their medical history. This intervention may either be pharmacological or non-pharmacological, and nurses must be aware of the therapeutic and adverse effects of the therapy. Necessary changes, if any, must be made to improve sleep in the patient.[37] Moreover, the nurse must be certain that pain relief occurs after 4 hours of drug intake, and help in the intake of medications for cancer without the consent of the patient or their complaints.[38]

Therapeutic interventions by nurses for pain management

Pharmacological interventions

Therapeutic interventions should not always be evidence-based, and extensive research is mandatory for the application of drugs in cancer care. Therefore, the positive or adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and corticosteroids must be analysed. Other non-invasive and complementary therapeutic approaches must be applied for personalised and better management of pain in cancer patients.[39,40]

Also, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin, diclofenac, ibuprofen, piroxicam, and celecoxib, nonopioid analgesics such as acetaminophen, and anticonvulsants such as neurontin, pregabalin are prescribed for pain management, irrespective of the severity. Opioid analgesics, such as codeine and tramadol, are prescribed for moderate pain in addition to the above-mentioned drugs, whereas morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, and methadone are prescribed for severe pain. In this regard, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are considered effective for pain management, and opioids may not be appropriate.[41-43] Moreover, antidepressants (e.g., duloxetine and amitriptyline), antiepileptics (e.g., oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine), and anaesthetics (e.g., lidocaine) are effective in managing neuropathic pain.[44] Besides nursing via conventional methods, like traditional Chinese medicine, can be used in addition to alleviate pain symptoms in cancer care by absorption through skin, exploring the acupoints and conductivity of meridians.[45]

Nurses are expected to administer accurate doses of therapeutic drugs to particular patients via a precise route. Since they spend more time with the patients in comparison to other healthcare providers, nurses must be experienced in both medical and non-medical interventions for the management of pain. Patients have fears or misapprehensions about being addicted to a drug, insensitivity to the drug, feeling sedated or inadequately treated, and respiratory dysfunction. Nurses should understand the fears of patients and address them appropriately on an individual case basis.[46,47] Opioids must be administered considering the threat of dependence, and nurses must deliver the optimum dose to the patient. All prescribed medicines should be verified, and suspicious use of drugs must be scrutinised and addressed.[48]

Management of non-pain symptoms

Shortness of breath as a non-pain symptom in CRC can be treated by proper surveillance of breathing across the airways by alternative positioning, providing airway adjuncts, clearing mucosal secretions, improving the symptoms of aspiration, and encouraging better breathing. In addition, oxygen demand should be minimised with limited activity, and the reduction of fever should be targeted to prevent hyperoxemia.[49,50] The inhalation of epinephrine or albuterol has been suggested in cases of wheezing.[51,52] In addition, hemodynamic support must be provided by monitoring cardiovascular distress, such as arrhythmia, if any.[53] Infections must be avoided and managed in cases of undesired events such as CRC progression.[54] Both cancer- and treatment-related factors can lead to fatigue, and enhanced physical activity can help reduce fatigue.[55,56]

Psychosocial and psychiatric distress, including delirium, panic attacks, distress, anxiety, and depression, are commonly observed in CRC patients. Consistent screening and continued follow-up can be advantageous. Increased physical activity and patient adjustment to their stoma, with advice from ostomy nurses, can support this cause too.[57,58] Educational nursing intervention can empower the CRC patients undergoing chemotherapy to take care of their own well-being with new adaptations in their lifestyle. Nurses assist doctors in helping cancer patients find a safe location for dressing comfortably. The advice of nurses on how to use an ostomy bag can promote the patient’s self-esteem, engage socially with less fear.[59-61] Cancer cachexia can be managed by treating cancer itself, which may reverse the symptoms of fat mass loss and anorexia. An elevated nutritional intake can help manage these symptoms. Several progestins, hormones, cannabinoids, immunomodulatory agents, and heart medications are used to manage cachexia and anorexia.[62,63]

Psychological distress can cause a patient to be agitated, and suicidal thoughts can arise because of frustration and feelings of dependence. Non-pain or psychological symptoms can be reduced by simultaneously reducing pain symptoms. Nurses should understand the root cause of depression, and symptoms must be screened and assessed. Precise medication must be provided, in addition to patient education and long-term follow-up. Nurses must promote a patient’s belief in passive death and reduce the feelings of anger in terminally ill conditions.[64] In addition, the use of antiemetics, such as ondansetron, fosaprepitant, and palonosetron, with regular follow-up can reduce nausea and vomiting in cancer patients.[65]

Studies indicate that nurses were usually advised to perform an evaluation of physical function in the elderly previous to chemotherapy.[66] Among CRC patients, fatigue was the most common symptom, followed by dyspnoea, drowsiness, and ascites, the conditions which worsened before death, following hospitalisation. Delirium and hallucination were near-end-of-life symptoms. These symptoms can aid in providing better palliative care by nurses.[67] It is important to note that palliative chemotherapy provides improved survival and quality of life after toxicity assessment. In this regard, World Health Organization (WHO) provides the note for performance status through grade 0 to 4: Grade 0: Normal functioning without any form of constraint; Grade 1: restricted to heavy work yet can do light work; Grade 2: Can do self-care but unable to do any other work with 50% of sleeping hours; Grade 3: Able to perform limited self-care with less than 50% of sleeping hours; Grade 4: Totally disabled and confined to bed or chair. For instance, the overall survival of patients after treatment with 5-fluorouracil is half compared to camptothecins. Hence, the choice of drug seems inevitable. The doses should be made based on the performance status of the older people.[68] A nurse navigator, allocated to be the cancer “contact nurse,” was more likely to be contacted than a nurse who is at a ward or the emergency department.[69] It was observed that patients who were attended by a cancer “contact nurse” experienced better psychosocial support, experience, and care.[70]

Non-pharmacological interventions

Non-pharmacological interventions aim to manage the effects of the disease and the psychological, social, and cultural aspects of pain. Meditating and gradual relaxation, being conscious during sleep by dreaming, recurring or uniform pattern of respiration, biofeedback, therapy by touch, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, hypnotherapy, hearing music, acupressure, and treatment with heat and cold using ice packs or heating pads are non-invasive modes of managing pain. Other non-invasive techniques, such as acupuncture, massage, reflexology, tai chi, yoga, aromatherapy, and cognitive-behavioural therapy, have also been applied to manage pain symptoms.[71-73]

PATIENT EXPERIENCE, END OF LIFE CARE, AND METHODS IN ESTABLISHING A PALLIATIVE CARE PROGRAM AT A CANCER CENTRE

The limitation of providing palliative care in the United States is that almost 50% of patients who may need hospice care are enrolled almost three weeks before the end of their life; one-third are enrolled seven days before the end of their life, and one-tenth are enrolled on the last day of their life. The average duration of end-of-life care for patients was 49 days, and less than 20% of this population received approximately 6 months of care. More than 50% of people with support for medical care were denied enrolment during their period of death. This may be due to three reasons: the eligibility criteria for hospice care, failure in the process of affording the associated expenditures, and improper conversations between physicians, nurses, and patients.[74]

New palliative care programs are initiated based on the input and necessities of physicians, nurses, and healthcare managers. Thus, financial support should be sought through a set of petitioning requests. For palliative care in patient care, the following issues must be considered: the number of clinical patients being diagnosed with cancer, admission volume, length of hospital or ICU stay, use of hospice care, frequency of symptoms, and advance directives for end-of-life care. Reports or inputs from patients, their families, and healthcare providers are critical for establishing palliative care in cancer centres. In this scenario, the needs of patients, families, healthcare providers, and cancer centres must be recognised and addressed by palliative care teams. The team’s goals should be focused on managing cancer pain via suitable drugs. In addition, the length of hospice care is expected to be as short as possible, in addition to maintaining the psychological stress associated with hospice care. Addressing these goals can help in setting successful palliative care unit. The expected deliverables are pain management, addressing patient goals and their likes, transfer from disease to a feeling of well-being, and involving non-medical interventions. Personal visits or virtual interactions between clinicians and patients are preferred by people living with terminal-stage cancer. The sign of successful care can be monitored using data retrieved from patients who have received palliative care. Research on palliative care must be shared to establish new palliative care centres in the future with better settings.[75]

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE AND FUTURE RESEARCH

Collectively presenting, it is very important to note that nursing education can improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the symptoms, and raise the chances of dying peacefully in their home as care is focused on a specific patient. Nurses can be trained even to prepare legal documents at the terminal stages. In this way, as mentioned before, nurses may engage in conversations with patients or their caregivers over phone or video chats, engaging in remote monitoring and follow-up every month. Nurses with knowledge of palliative care are better at providing support to patients than those with no training, as they can effectively determine or identify patients with terminal illness.[76]

Related to this, nurses engaged in oncological departments will provide emotional support and evaluate or advise caregivers in the management of pain inflicted on patients. Also, they can inform their caregivers about their access to the hospital and emergency services. Furthermore, this will help nurses provide patients with options for preserving their health during periods of stress and deliver information about external financial support from society. In addition, research publications on palliative care have increased the number of home care providers. In this connection, the nurses may get educated through universities or by getting shared via the proficiencies of experienced nurses working in oncological clinics.[77] In addition, shared decision making with healthcare providers can make patients engage in deciding their treatment options through active conversations with physicians and nurses to receive a patient-centred holistic approach to treatment. E-learning may also effectively assist these strategies in a cost-effective manner.[78]

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

Although the survey was focused on articles published starting from the year 1990, the articles were predominantly from the last 10 years. There were very few published reports on the role of nurses in palliative care for geriatrics with CRC, especially since there are no full-scale published RCTs on this topic. The limited availability of resources or articles on this topic, besides the absence of RCTs, affected the ability to derive the outcomes of the review. Hence, the study included both research and review articles to derive results, discussions, and conclusions. This is the limitation associated with the study, and the lack of RCT-based evidence could therefore be considered a potential bias. Although these are the limitations of the review, the data in the review, sourced, collected, and extracted all available information on the topic, which is a novel and crucial one. Therefore, there is no publication bias other than the one mentioned above, as the review has extracted all available data from the majority of the articles published on the topic, and the data were not analysed statistically. Additionally, there are no competing interests that can lead to bias in favour of a particular intervention. Also, this is a scoping review and not a systematic one. All these criteria support and remove significant potential bias during the interpretation of this article. As per quality appraisal, the review critically evaluated the 65 primary studies included to assess their trustworthiness, relevance, and methodological quality. There are no major interferences in this aspect. In addition, the outcomes were derived from articles sourced from three major databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Also, the majority of scoping reviews focus on the usage of English-only articles. This as well, did support in minimising the information overload, reducing the publication bias, and helped in providing a balanced overview of the research topic.

CONCLUSION

Treating geriatric CRC patients with limited resources remains a major concern, at which point the activities of nurses seem inevitable. Educating early phase nurses with limited experience in palliative care through experienced nurses or choosing those with higher educational qualifications can be effective in pain management. Likewise, nurses should explore emotional issues in terminally ill patients, provide emotional support, and improve their quality of life. Nurses should listen more to the patient, make use of their education, and communicate effectively with the patient and other healthcare providers.

To summarise, among healthcare providers, the role of nurses in imparting patient knowledge about pain associated with cancer and the components of pain seems crucial. During this course, nurses will develop pain management strategies and revise the questionnaires to improve patient outcomes. Their idea will be to analyse characteristics such as the severity of pain, accompanying relief, and the effect of pain on day-to-day activities, sleep, and emotions that become negative as days move towards the end of life. In addition, the adverse effects of therapy, effectiveness of pain treatment, ability of the patient to make decisions on their treatment, and application of non-pharmacological interventions can be effectively analysed by an educated nurse who can perform or assist in this research.[79] Linked to this, palliative care at the early stages of cancer is beneficial in both economic status and consent to a limited hospital stay, and decreases the chances of dying in the hospital.[80] Therefore, educating nurses and training them to engage in palliative care and hospice, besides pain management, can help geriatric patients with CRC to cope with the suffering effectively. Since research reports on palliative care and pain management in geriatrics with CRC are very limited, this review is vital, and future research on this aspect is warranted.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by Jiangsu Clinical Innovation Center of Digestive Cancer of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No.2021.6).

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by Jiangsu Clinical Innovation Center of Digestive Cancer of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No.2021.6).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , . Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Cancer statistics in Chinese older people, 2022: current burden, time trends, and comparisons with the US, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Sci China Life Sci. 2023;66:1079-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Colorectal cancer disparity in African Americans: Risk factors and carcinogenic mechanisms. Am J Pathol. 2018;188:291-303.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Increasing trend of colorectal cancer incidence in Korea, 1999-2009. Cancer Res Treat. 2012;44:219-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Current management of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2011;4:53-61.
    [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: The risk, pathogenesis, prevention and diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9872-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl Oncol. 2021;14:101174.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Effects of physical activity on colorectal cancer risk among family history and body mass index subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Association between diet-related behaviour and risk of colorectal cancer: A scoping review. J Cancer Prev. 2022;27:208-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Colorectal cancer and alcohol consumption—populations to molecules. Cancers.. 2018;10:38.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Smoking-related risks of colorectal cancer by anatomical subsite and sex. Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189:543-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Gut microbiota, inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:4053-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodology. 2005;8:19-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022;18:e1230.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Empowering nurses in providing palliative care to cancer patients: Action research study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018;24:98-103.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Recommendations to support nurses and improve the delivery of oncology and palliative care in India. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017;23:188-98.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. Nursing’s potential to address the growing cancer burden in low- and middle-income countries. JGO. 2016;2:154-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Strategies for palliative care in advanced colorectal cancer. Dig Surg. 2004;21:344-51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Palliative operations for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:846-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , . Management of stage IV rectal cancer: Palliative options. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:835-47.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Engagement, advance care planning, and hospice use in a telephonic nurse-led palliative care program for persons living with advanced cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:2310.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Kozier and Erb’s fundamentals of nursing Vol Vol 1. (ISBN 0132706547, 1st Australian edition). Pearson Australia: Prentice Hall PTR; . p. :1632.
  24. , , , , , , et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:1030-47.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Is a nurse‐led telephone intervention a viable alternative to nurse‐led home care and standard care for patients receiving oral capecitabine? Results from a large prospective audit in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Care.. 2013;22:413-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Developing and piloting a nurse-led model of follow-up in the multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11:212-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;29:115-24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . The use of games by nurses in palliative care: A scoping review. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2023;29:58-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , , , et al. Effect of an oncology nurse–led primary palliative care intervention on patients with advanced cancer. The CONNECT cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:1451-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Nurses’ performance in palliative care: spiritual care in the light of Theory of Human Caring. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , . Exploring the adaptive leisure activities of classified nursing model in elderly colon cancer patients: a perspective on interactive care. BMC Palliat Care. 2023;22:198.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , , et al. Expected survival with and without second‐line palliative chemotherapy: who wants to know? Health Expectations. 2015;18:2903-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Effectiveness of a multimedia educational intervention to improve understanding of the risks and benefits of palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:1265-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  34. . Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. JAMA. 1998;279:1877-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. . Assessment and management of cancer pain in older adults: Strategies for success. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018;5:248-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  36. . Cancer pain: A critical review of mechanism-based classification and physical therapy management in palliative care. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011;17:116-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  37. . Nurse’s role in controlling cancer pain. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011;33:S146-148.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Associated factors with the knowledge of nurses of a high complexity oncology centre in Brazil, on the management of cancer pain. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019;13:928.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Practice review: Evidence-based and effective management of pain in patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med. 2020;34:444-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , . Evidence-based management of cancer pain. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018;34:215-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , . Current aproach to cancer pain management: Availability and implications of different treatment options. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3:381-400.
    [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  42. , . Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal cancer chemoprevention. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:594.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and biomarkers: A new paradigm in colorectal cancer. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1130710.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  44. , . Pain Management Medications. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560692/. [Last accessed 2025 October 6]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , . Effectiveness of comfort nursing combined with continuous nursing on patients with colorectal cancer chemotherapy. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022;2022:9647325.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , . Nursing care and management of adverse events for patients with BRAF(V600E)-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer receiving encorafenib in combination with cetuximab: a review. Support Care Cancer: Off journal Multinational Assoc Supportive Care Cancer. 2023;31:204.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , . Role of the oncology nurse. In: , , , eds. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine (6th edition). Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK13570/. [Last accessed 2025 October 6]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , . WHO analgesic ladder. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554435/. [Last accessed 2025 October 6]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , . Nasopharyngeal airway. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513220/. [Last accessed 2025 October 6]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , . Airway management. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; . Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470403/. [Last accessed 2025 October 6]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , et al. A randomized trial of nebulized epinephrine vs albuterol in the emergency department treatment of bronchiolitis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:113-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , . Comparison of nebulized epinephrine to albuterol in bronchiolitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:305-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , . Hemodynamic support during catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiogenic shock. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1145123.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , et al. Significance of infectious agents in colorectal cancer development. J Cancer. 2013;4:227-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , . A practical approach to fatigue management in colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:275-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , , , et al. Physical activity and long-term fatigue among colorectal cancer survivors – a population-based prospective study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , . Psychosocial issues in colorectal cancer survivorship: the top ten questions patients may not be asking. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014;5:395-400.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , , . Colorectal cancer survival: prevalence of psychosocial distress and unmet supportive care needs. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:1483-91.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  59. , . The impact of palliative care and nursing intervention on the psychology and quality of life of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. J Oncol. 2022;2022:7777446.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  60. , , , , , . Nurse-led interventions among older adults affected by cancer: An integrative review. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023;10:100289.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  61. , , , , . Experience of participating in national home-based medical care project for cancer patients with a temporary stoma: A qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2025;33:525.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , . Optimal management of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. Cancer Manag Res. 2010;2:27-38.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  63. , , , , . Cancer cachexia, mechanism and treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;7:17-29.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  64. . Oncology nurse: Psychological nursing for cancer patients, what can we do? Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022;9:P133-134.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. , . Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: Optimizing prevention and management. Am Health Drug Benefits. 2012;5:232-40.
    [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  66. , , , , , , et al. Distinctions between self-report and performance-based measures of physical function in older patients prior to chemotherapy. Cancer Nurs. 2021;44:E735-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. , , , , , , et al. Physical and psychological symptoms and signs in dying digestive tract cancer patients: the East Asian collaborative cross-cultural Study to Elucidate the Dying process (EASED) Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:3603-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  68. . Campto® effective and flexible chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003;9:290-97.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. , , , , , . Preparedness for colorectal cancer surgery and recovery through a person-centred information and communication intervention – A quasi-experimental longitudinal design. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0225816.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  70. , . Exploring patient experiences of cancer services in regional Australia. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33:E25-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. , . Complementary and alternative medicine in cancer pain management: A systematic review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2015;21:105-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  72. , , . Nonpharmacological Interventions for pain management in lung cancer patients: A systematic review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2020;26:444-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  73. , , , . Psychological and non-pharmacologic treatments for pain in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022;63:E505-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. . Nurse’s role in increasing patient access to hospice care. MedSurg Nursing. 2011;20:200-2,207.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. , . Starting a palliative care program at a cancer center. In: , , , , , eds. The comprehensive cancer center: Development, integration, and implementation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; . p. :107-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. , , , . Nursing’s role in leading palliative care: A call to action. Nurse Education Today. 2018;61:216-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  77. , . Palliative care to the cancer patient: Turkish Nurses’ perspectives. J Palliat Care Med 2015:s5.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. , , , , , , et al. A blended learning for general practitioners and nurses on skills to support shared decision-making with patients about palliative cancer treatment: A one-group pre-posttest study. Patient Educ Couns. 2023;112:107712.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. , , . Nursing’s role in cancer pain management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011;15:250-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. . Palliative Care in Colorectal Cancer. In: , ed. Colorectal Cancer. London: IntechOpen; . p. :1-226.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections