Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2 (
04
); 44-49
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703611

Root Cementum Invasion and Adhesion by Enterococcus Faecalis Confocal Analysis.

Ph.D. Student, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Science, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, Karnataka, India
Senior Professor & Head of the Department, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Science, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, Karnataka, India
Sr. Lecture, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Sn Hke'S Dental college, GULBARGA

Address for correspondence: Rahul Halkai, Ph.D. Student, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Science, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575018, Karnataka, India. Mobile: +919481636661 E-mail: drrahulendo@yahoo.co.in

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Aims

to know ability of Enterococcus faecalis invasion and adhesion into root cementum.

Methodology

Forty single rooted human intact teeth were selected, group I with 20 teeth as control group with no access opening and apical seal with varnish. Group II with 20 teeth, after access opening and canal debridement, all the samples were subjected for gamma sterilization to ensure complete absence of microorganisms, and then exposed to Enterococcus faecalis broth, in group II broth is placed with the help of micro pipette into root canal and at the same time apical 1/3 of tooth were immersed into broth with both groups for 8 weeks. Biomechanical preparation, obturation and coronal sealing done using GIC with group II, followed by apical 1/3 immersed in the enterococcus broth for 8 weeks, examination under confocal laser scanning microscope after splitting the teeth samples into two halfs buccolingually.

Results

This study shows only adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis to root cementum. Conclusion Adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis to root cementum may be the possible reason for persisting infection after root canal treatment.

Keywords

Enterocoocus faecalis
persisting infection
root cementum
confocal laser scanning microscope

Introduction

Bacteria are located in inaccessible areas such as complicated root canal anatomy and dentinal tubules, and it is difficult to deliver antibacterial agents to these locations1. Bacteria may survive and recolonize the root canal space whenever there is opportunity, and this may become a focal source for persistent infection, it is difficult to render the root canal free from bacteria. Although the mechanism of bacterial invasion is not completely understood, bacterial adhesion to dentinal tubule walls (TWs) is a logical early step in the process. Collagen is widely considered to be the primary substrate for specific binding of E. faecalis to dentine, and the collagen binding protein of E. faecalis (Ace) and a serine protease (Spr) have been proposed to play significant roles in binding to the root canal wall2. Ace also promotes E. Faecalis binding to collagen type I3,4, and in vitro ace gene expression at 37 _C was enhanced in the presence of collagen5. However, the interaction of E. faecalis specifically with dentinal tubules has never been investigated.

The bacteria's ability to penetrate into dentin can be determined through microbiological analyses by the number of colony forming units (CFUs)6 the number of tubules infected in the histologic samples7or the presence of bacteria in the root canal wall8. Each method has advantage and disadvantage. Microbiological sampling techniques can estimate the number of colony forming units but however this method does not give clear information about the spatial distribution of bacteria. Histological section shows the distribution of bacteria in infected dentin but not about viability of bacteria. Transmission microscope provide high resolution images of bacteria but technique spends time and requires multiple steps9. Confocal laser scanning microscope allows getting series of optical sections as thin as 0.3 um and vital staining technique to determine the viability profile10. The aim of this study is to know ability of Enterococcus faecalis invasion and adhesion to root cementum.

Methodology

The present in-vitro study was conducted in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences Mangalore. Central Research Laboratories AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental sciences. Teeth sterilization (gamma irradiation) done at Microtol, Bangalore. Data collection done using inverted confocal laser scanning microscope9 (ZEISS LSM 510 META. GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) at Indian Institute of Sciences (IISc) Bangalore. Materials used for study (fig 1) a) Effendroph b) Micropipette c) Micropipette tube d) Teeth sample in sterilization pouch. E) Trypton Soyabean Agar broth

All the material used in the study, a) Effendroph b) Micropipette c) Micropipette tube d) teeth sample in sterilization pouch. E) Trypton Soyabean Agar broth
Fig 1
All the material used in the study, a) Effendroph b) Micropipette c) Micropipette tube d) teeth sample in sterilization pouch. E) Trypton Soyabean Agar broth

Selection of Samples

Forty human single rooted teeth recently extracted for orthodontic reasons were collected for the study. After extraction the teeth were stored in chlorhexidine solution, until collection of all teeth.

Inclusion Criteria

Single rooted caries free teeth, examined under 20x magnification under a microscope to rule out any cracks, caries, fractures or craze lines and radiographed to determine the presence of a single canal were included for the present study.

Exclusion Criteria

Teeth that had already undergone root canal treatment or teeth with more than one canal, immature root apices, teeth with root caries, restorations, fracture or craze lines, thin curved roots, calcified canals were excluded from the study.

Methodology

The teeth were cleaned off soft tissue, calculus and stains with the help of sharp hand scalers and thoroughly washed under running tap water to remove any remaining tissue remnants sticking to the tooth surface and were stored in normal saline solution at room temperature until further use.

All the forty specimens were randomly divided in two experimental groups as follows and coding of samples done (fig 2).

Coding of teeth samples group I(1) &II(2).
Fig 2
Coding of teeth samples group I(1) &II(2).

Group 1(n=20): (control group): Intact teeth with no access cavity preparation and sealing of the root apex done using varnish.

Group 2 (n=20): Access cavity preparation done.

Procedure

All the samples in group 1 (controlled group), no access opening was done and from the apex to apical 1 to 2 mm of the teeth sealed with two coats of varnish followed by gamma irradiation of all the samples to eradicate bacteria which in case were existing before. All the specimens in Group 2, access opening, canal debridement was done and subjected to gamma irradiation, followed by culturing with E.faecalis within root canal and apical one third of teeth submerged in the broth with group I and group II samples and subjected for culturing for 8 weeks.

Culturing Procedure

Enterococcus Faecalis streptomycin resistant strains were cultured in Trypton Soyabean Agar broth. Broth is prepared by mixing the 1.8 grams powder in 60ml of distilled water. The prepared broth is sterilized in Autoclave, after that the strains are inoculated in the broth (fig 3) and placed in an Incubator for the bacteria to grow at 37℃ (fig 4) for 24–48hrs. For confirmation of the bacteria Gram staining was done (fig 5). The cultured broth was inoculated within root canal of the teeth samples with a micropipette, and also apical one third submerged in the broth (fig 6). The whole process was refreshed every alternative two days for a period of 8weeks.

Enteroccocus Faecalis culture and inoculation of Enterococcus Faecalis culture in broth.
Fig 3
Enteroccocus Faecalis culture and inoculation of Enterococcus Faecalis culture in broth.
Gram staining shows gram +ve Cocci agganged in chains and in clusters.
Fig 4
Gram staining shows gram +ve Cocci agganged in chains and in clusters.
Apical 1/3 of teeth samples dipped in Enterococcus Faecalis broth.
Fig 5
Apical 1/3 of teeth samples dipped in Enterococcus Faecalis broth.

Biomechanical Preparation & Obturation

After 8 weeks of culturing all the specimens of group 2 were subjected to biomechanical preparation followed by obturation up to the working length. Working length was determined by using Root ZX II (J.Morita, Japan). The teeth were instrumented using Protaper Ni-Ti rotary instrument system in a contra angle gear reduction hand piece (X-Smart Dentsply), finally obturated with gutta preach single cone using AH plus sealer.

Culture and Observation

After biomechanical preparation & obturation all the teeth specimens were again immersed into E.Feacalis broth for 8 weeks. After incubation period all the samples were washed using 1 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove nonadherent bacteria11. A vertical groove is made on bucco lingual surface starting from occlusal surface to apical tip using tapered fissure diamond point, than with the help of chisel splitted in two half's segments (fig 7). Each half of the spitted segment was observed for the type of cemento dentinal junction under spectrophotometery microscope. All the teeth samples were observed under inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (ZEISS LSM 510 META. GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After coding the samples, teeth were stained with 50 pL fluorescein diacetate (FDA sigma, st Louis, MO) and 50 pL of propidium iodide (PI, Sigma)9. FDA is nonfluorescent cell permeable dye that is converted to fluorescein (green) by intracellular esterases produced by metabolically active microorganism10. PI is a fluorescent molecule impermeable to the cellular membrane and generally excluded from viable cell thus live bacterial cells are fluorescent green, whereas dead bacteria with damaged membranes are fluorescent red12.

inoculation chamber showing teeth samples placed in controlled chamber for bacterial growth.
Fig 6
inoculation chamber showing teeth samples placed in controlled chamber for bacterial growth.
teeth sample spited into two half's
Fig 7
teeth sample spited into two half's

CLSM Analysis

The group I and II samples were examined on inverted CLSM beyond Cemento Dentinal Junction (CDJ) for the presence of E. Faecalis. Data was subjected to appropriate statistical analysis.

Results

Group I (fig 8) samples showed absence of Enterococcus faecalis in root cementum on other hand group II FDA/PI staining technique showed red and green colour coccoidal structure adhere to root cementum under inverted confocal microscope (fig 9). Separate picture of Dead (red) and live (green) staining (Fig 10) Results were subjected to statistical analysis using Z test. Z value (table 1) is 17.89 (?1.96 for p =0.05) this shows significant presence of Enterococcus Faecalis in group II.

Group I samples showing absence of Enterococcus Faecalis.
Fig 8
Group I samples showing absence of Enterococcus Faecalis.
Group II samples showed presence of Enterococcus faecalis adhering to root cementum.
Fig 9
Group II samples showed presence of Enterococcus faecalis adhering to root cementum.
Separate picture showing live (green colour) and dead (red colour) Enterococcus Faecalis.
Fig 10
Separate picture showing live (green colour) and dead (red colour) Enterococcus Faecalis.
Table 1 Data calculated applying Z test.
Group I (control group) Group II (apical 1/3 exposed to 5.5 ph)
Proportion of presence of Enterococcus Faecalis in the samples 0 1
Z value 17.89

Discussion

In this study E Faecalis was chosen as the test organism because Enterococcus faecalis found to penetrate deep into dentinal tubules in vitro13, and one among the micro organisms found in reinfection or persistent lesions14. Enterococcus faecalis produces protein during stress like Ace and serine protease (spr) protein15, which in turn helps to adhere type I & IV collagen present in root cementum3.

The adhesion of E Faecalis to type I and IV collagen is the basis of my study because, root cementum at apical one third of root is made of cellular cementum and majorly of type IV collagen.

Cementocytes are interconnected by canniculli through which nutrients from periradicular region reaches to cementocytes deep inside the cementum which help to survive. Canniculli may be the potential gateway for enterococcus faecalis to invade into root cementum in apical one third of the teeth. Other factors facilitating the presence of Enterococcus faecalis in obturated root canals with persistent lesions include, it can survive in high pH16, long starvation periods without nutrients, and in presence of serum it has the ability to recover17.

Bacteria encounters with variety of stressful conditions in the root canal, such as nutrient deficiency, other bacterial toxins, and intra canal medicaments, these conditions may regulate bacterial adhesin expression. Addition to it, when ever serum leakage into the root canal, inducing the expression of Aggregation substance (AS) and other carbohydrate moieties, thereby helping bacteria to adhere, even alkaline pH obtained by calcium hydroxide at the dentinal zone is in effective due to deeper penetration of Enterococcus faecalis19. Other mechanisms of survival may be through Lipoteichoic acids (LTA), which resist the bacterium against many lethal conditions 19.

E. faecalis prevents the growth of other bacteria with cytolysin, AS-48 (Aggregation substance), and bacteriocins. Erythrocytes are the target cells of cytolysin 20 also PMNs and macrophages and a broad range of Gram-positive but not Gram-negative organisms 21 The bacteriocin effect of cytolysin of E. faecalis helps colonization of the Gram-negatives, there could be a shift of bacterial flora related with periodontal disease22, the latter factors is non pathogenic in humans. Along with cytolysin, they facilitate the dominance of E. faecalis in a mixed infection and serve as means to obtain ecological advantages which can result in disease in man. The root canal hardly contains any nutrient-rich medium, but when required E. faecalis may derive the energy it needs from the hyaluronan present in the dentin by breaking down hyaluronidase or E. faecalis may also feed on fluid present in the dentinal tubules. So it seems that even, well obturated fluid tight seal does effect the survival of Enterococcus faecalis because it can generate energy to survive. The foci of infection is E Faecalis present deep inside the dentin or cementum that cannot be reached by host defence cells such as PNM, lymphocytes and macrophages etc, E faecalis elicits permanent provocative effect on the host defence cell mechanism which in turn damages periradicular region.

We used gamma irradiation to sterilize the teeth because it does not alter collagen characteristics which is very important for E Faecalis to adhere to collagen, other methods of sterilization of teeth samples are by autoclave, hot air oven etc. Disadvantages of autoclave is it collapses the collagen strands and use of hot air oven makes teeth dehydrated and more brittle.

Previously most of the methods like fluorescent probes used failed to detect viability of bacterial and also spatial distribution23, bacterial viability could be checked by using conventional fluorescence microscopy but it has it disadvantage of decalcification the teeth samples, creating artificial condition, high background haze makes difficult to distinguish between individual cells5. In this context, better methodologies for the identification of bacterial viability in cementum are needed. The inverted CLSM analysis has the advantage over the conventional fluorescence microscopy to visualize bacteria. In fact our research confirms ability of E Faecalis to infect root cementum and substantial improvements that show the vitality of the bacteria in root cementum. The visualisation of live and dead bacteria in root cementum using confocal microscopy, helps to determine the presence and adhesion of E.faecalis in the root cementum at the cellular level.

Conclusion

Bacterial adhesion to dentinal tubule walls (TWs) is a logical early step in the process. Collagen is widely considered to be the primary substrate for specific binding of E. faecalis to cementum, and the collagen binding protein of E. faecalis (Ace) and a serine protease (Spr) have been proposed to play significant roles in binding to the root canal wall. Ace also promotes E. faecalis binding to collagen type I and IV 16 and in vitro ace gene expression at 37°c was enhanced in the presence of collagen5. There is 40 % available collagen present in root cementum, collagen presence in root cementum might help enterococcus faecalis to inhabit in cementum, and might be possible region for treatment failure or in ability to control infection at root apex.

References

  1. , . In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1375-1379.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Influence of Enterococcus faecalis proteases and the collagen-binding protein, Ace, on adhesion to dentin. Oral Microbio Immun. 2003;18:121-126.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Diversity of ace, a gene encoding a microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules, from different strains of Enterococcus faecalis and evidence for production of Ace during human infections. Infect Immun. 2000a;68:5210-5217.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Enterococcus faecalis adhesin, Ace, mediates attachment to extracellular matrix proteins collagen type IV and laminin as well as collagen type I. Infect Immun. 2000b;68:5218-5224.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Ligand-signaled upregulation of Enterococcus faecalis ace transcription, a mechanism for modulating host-E Faecalis interaction. Infect Immun. 2006;74((9)):4982-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Octenidine in root canal and dentine disinfection EX vivo. Int Endod J. 2007;40:845-51.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Enterococcus Faecalis- a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. Int Endod J. 2001;34:399-405.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Effect of photo-activated disinfection on endodontic pathogens ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2008;41:227-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Confocal laser scanning microscopy is appropriate to detect viability of enterococcus faecalis in dentin. Int Endod J. 2008;34:1198-1201.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Confocal microscopy study of undisturbed and chlorhexidine-treated dental biofilm. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1436-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Acridine orange as an indicator of bacterial susceptibility to gentamicin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;153:199-204.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , et al. Ex vivo gingival biofilm consortia. Lett. Appl Microbiol. 2005;41:404-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1375-1379.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 1998;31:1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Ace is a collagen-binding MSCRAMM from Enterococcus faecalis. J micro Chemis. 1999;274:26939-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 2002;35:221-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Starvation survival, growth and recovery of Enterococcus faecalis in human serum. Oral Microbiol Immun. 2003;18:234-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . pH changes in dental tissues after root canal filling with calcium hydroxide. J Endod. 1981;7:17-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Morphological and physiological study of autolytic-defective Streptococcus faecium strains. J Bacterio. 1979;138:598-608.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Bacteriocin (hemolysin) of Streptococcus zymogenes. J Bacteriol. 1968;96:1895-1902.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. . Bacteriolysis and inhibition of Gram-positive bacteria by components of Streptococcus zymogenes lysine. J Bacteriol. 1971;105:156-159.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . The growth-inhibitory effect of the Enterococcus faecalis bacteriocin encoded by pAD1 extends to the oral streptococci. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1640-1645.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . Octenidine in root canal and dentine disinfection EX VIVO. Int Endod J. 2007;40:845-51.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections