Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Report
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Narrative Review
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Short Communication
Short Communications
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
3 (
4
); 007-009
doi:
10.1055/s-0040-1703693

Systematic Review Of Urinary Tract Infection Caused By Acinetobacter Species Among Hospitalised Patients

Department of Microbiology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Department of Microbiology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Department of Microbiology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Department of Microbiology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018, India
Department of Microbiology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Nitte University, Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018, India

Correspondence: Sanjeev H. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy Deralakatte, Mangalore - 575 018 India +9108242204490-92 drsanjeevh@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited.
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Introduction

Acinetobacter species have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens and have been known to cause different kinds of opportunistic infections. Acinetobacter species cause a wide variety of illness in debilitated and hospitalized patients especially in intensive care units (ICU). Because of frequent resistance to aminoglycoside's, fluoroquinolone's, ureidopenicillin's and third generation cephalosporin's, carbapenem are important agents in managing Acinetobacter infections.

Material and Methods

A systematic retrospective analysis was performed on culture positive urinary tract infections among hospitalized patients between January 2010-December 2012. Significant isolates of Acinetobacter species were included in the study and was further analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility, associated risk factors, underlying debility and co-morbid conditions.

Results

Among the 2240 culture positive samples, Acinetobacter species was isolated from 46 patients with UTI. Tigecyline was found to be the antibiotic with highest susceptibility (91%) followed by Imipenem(69.5%), Meropenem (67.3%) and Gatilfoxacin (63%). The six patients who expired had disseminated infection with highly resistant strains of Acinetobacter species. Mechanical ventilation was the predominant risk factor for severe and disseminated infection.

Conclusion

Acinetobacter infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter are common in hospitals, especially in ICU's. A feasible hospital antibiotic policy and strict adherence to it, rigorous surveillance and good hospital infection control programme is needed to control the increasing incidence of highly resistant Acinetobacter infections.

Keywords

Acinetobacter species
Mechanical ventilation
Nosocomial infections
carbapenems

Introduction:

Acinetobacter species have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens and have been known to cause different kinds of opportunistic infections. Acinetobacter baumanii is now recognized to be the Acinetobacter genomic species of great clinical importance1. They are ubiquitous in nature and are highly resistant to commonly used antibiotics2. Acinetobacter species cause a wide variety of illness in debilitated and hospitalized patients especially in intensive care units (ICU). These bacteria survive for long time in the hospital environment, and there by the opportunity for cross infection are enhanced3. The main site of infection is the lower respiratory tract and urinary tract, and these distributions are very similar to that of other nosocomial pathogens4. Septicemia due to Acinetobacter species is gaining importance in neonates5. Because of frequent resistance to aminoglycoside's, fluoroquinolone's, ureidopenicillin's and third generation cephalosporin's, carbapenem are important agents in managing Acinetobacter infections. However, there has been an alarming increase in carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter species over the last decade6-9. It is difficult to explain the role of Acinetobacter acquisition in the ICU, since they are ubiquitous and have tremendous colonizing capacity. In addition, the risk factors for Acinetobacter acquisition may vary in different set up with epidemic outbreak of infection or endemic colonization1, 10. The risk factors that are involved in acquisition of Acinetobacter infection, as reported by other investigators, are artificial ventilation, broad spectrum antibiotic therapy, endotracheal intubation, parenteral nutrition and intravascular catheterization5.

This study was conducted to determine the frequency of urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by Acinetobacter species in hospitalised patients, analyse their antimicrobial susceptibility and risk factors involved.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, K S Hegde Medical College and Hospital, Mangalore. A systematic retrospective analysis was performed on culture positive urinary tract infections among hospitalized patients between January 2010-December 2012. Significant isolates of Acinetobacter species were included in the study and was further analyzed for antimicrobial susceptibility, associated risk factors, underlying debility and co-morbid conditions.

Results

During the period of January 2010 to December2012, 6909 urine samples were received by the Clinical Microbiology laboratory. Of these, 2240 samples were culture positive, showing significant growth of bacteria or yeast like fungi. Among the 2240 culture positive samples, Acinetobacter species was isolated from 46 patients with UTI.

Among the 46 patients with Acinetobacter UTI, 24 were female and 22 were male patients. The mean age of the patients was 56.2 years. Twenty five patients were admitted to any one of the ICU for variable period of time during their hospital stay. The common causes for admission to ICU were Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with diabetes mellitus (8), chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury (6), stroke (5) and RTA/head injury (2). Of these 25 patients, Acinetobacter could also be isolated from blood in 4 patients and from respiratory specimen in 6 patients. Mortality was observed in 6 patients, which included 4 patients who were on mechanical ventilation. Two of the above patients had head injury due to RTA and their respiratory specimen yielded growth of Acinetobacter species. The other two deceased patients were admitted with chronic renal failure and COPD with diabetes mellitus respectively.

The predominant risk factor was presence of urinary catheter in situ (35). The commonest reason for urinary catheterization was mechanical ventilation (11) for respiratory failure secondary to post surgical complication, chronic renal disease, acute kidney injury and neurosurgical procedures. Other risk factor included prolonged hospital stay and extended use of antimicrobial agents. Diabetes mellitus was the most common (27) co-morbid condition associated with UTI.

The antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolate is given in Table 1.

Discussion

Acinetobacter species account for a substantial proportion of endemic nosocomial infection. Multidrug resistance increasingly reported in these pathogens is posing a threat to hospitalised patients. The acquisition of multi drug resistance is related to environmental contamination and contact with transiently colonized health care providers. Carbapenem's, like Imipenem and Meropenem, have been the drug of choice for treating infection caused by Acinetobacter species11-13. In our study, Imipenem and Meropenem showed sensitivity of 69.5% and 67.3% respectively. The resistance to carbapenem may be mediated by hydrolysing enzymes such as OXA carbapenamases and metallo beta lactamases.

Tigecyline was found to be the antibiotic with highest susceptibility (91%) followed by Imipenem (69.5%), Meropenem (67.3%) and Gatilfoxacin (63%). Though no resistance to Polymyxin B and Colistin was noted in the current study, its clinical utility in treatment of UTI is very limited. Further, reporting of Polymyxin B and Colistin resistance can be made only by determining the MIC. Resistance to 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporin's (82%) and aminoglycoside's (74-78%) was uniform and very high.

Nitrofurantoin, which is widely used in treatment of uncomplicated UTI caused by Enterobactericeae, was not found efficacious in treatment of Acinetobacter UTI.

The six patients who expired had disseminated infection with highly resistant strains of Acinetobacter species. Mechanical ventilation was the predominant risk factor for severe and disseminated infection. Four of the expired patients had Ventilator associated Pneumonia (VAP). Similar findings have been reported by studies, where Acinetobacter was responsible for 35% of VAP and majority of the patients were from ICU14.

Conclusion

Acinetobacter infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Multidrug resistant Acinetobacter are common in hospitals especially in ICU's. Though carbapenem are drug of choice in treating these infections, such resistance profiles, as seen in the study, is alarming. Alternate drugs such as Tigecyline and Polymyxin B have their own limitation.

Thus, control measures should be taken that addresses the source of infection. Attention needs to be given to simple but effective hospital infection control practices such as hand hygiene, barrier precaution, environmental cleaning and strict disinfection of patient care equipments. Unwarranted and unrestricted use of antibiotics should be checked as extended use of 3rd generation cephalosporin's is known to increase carbapenem resistance. A feasible hospital antibiotic policy and strict adherence to it, rigorous surveillance and good hospital infection control programme are needed to control the increasing incidence of highly resistant Acinetobacter infections.

Table 1
Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Acinetobacter species

Antibiotic

Sensitivity (%)

Amikacin

12 (26%)

Gentamicin

10 (22%)

Norfloxacin

06 (13%)

Gatifloxacin

29 (63%)

Cotrimoxazole

05 (11%)

Nitrofurantoin

06 (13%)

Cefotaxime

08 (18%)

Cefotriaxone

08 (18%)

Ceftazidime

08 (18%)

Cefipime

08 (18%)

Piperacillin - Tazobactam

08 (18%)

Imipenem

32 (69.5%)

Meropenem

31 (67.3%)

Tigecycline

42 (91%)

Polymyxin B

46* (100%)

Colistin

46* (100%)

*Susceptibility to polymyxin B and colistin should be confirmed by MIC test.

References

  1. , . Nosocomial infections due to Acinetobacter species: Clinical findings, risk factors and prognostic factors. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24:39-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Nosocomial infections in PICU. Pediar Today 2004:783-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Mechanisms of resistance to carbapenams in Meropenem resistant Acinetobacter isolates from clinical samples. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:121-125.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Acinetobacter species as nosocomial pathogen:Microbiological, clinical and epidemiological. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9:365-366.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Acinetobacter septicemia in neonates. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2004;22(71)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Endemic carbapenam-resistant Acinetobacter species in Brooklyn, New York: Citywide prevalence, inter-institutional spread and relation to antibiotic usage. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:101-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Characterization of a nosocomial outbreak caused by a multiresistant Acinetobacter baumanii strain with a carbapene-hydrolysing enzyme: High level carbapenem resistance in A.baumanii is nit due solely to the presence of beta-lactamase. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3299-3305.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Emergence and rapid spread of carbapenam-resistance during a large and sustained hospital outbreak og multiresistant Acinetobacter baumanii. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4086-4095.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Molecular epidemiology and mechanism of Carbapenam-resistance in Acinetobacter baumanii endemic in New York city. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:214-220.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Acinetobacter species as nosocomial pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiological Infect Dis. 1998;17:73-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Acinetobacter baumanii:Emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:538-582.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Outbreaks of Imipenem resistant Acinetobacter baumanii producing OXA-23 B-lactamase in a tertiary care hospital in Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:764-770.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and distribution of blaOXA genes among Acinetobacter species isolated from patients at Tehran hospital. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008;61:274-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , . Analysis of risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:460-463.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections