Translate this page into:
Unfolding Various Concepts of Junctional Epithelium
Corresponding Author: Bhavana Puvvalla, Post graduate student, Department of Periodontics, D.A.P.M.R.V. Dental college, Bangalore, Mobile: +91 93424 14744 E-mail: bannuu03@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
The Gingival epithelium comprises of three different areas based on their anatomical and functional points of view 1) the oral or outer epithelium (OGE), 2) Sulcular epithelium (SE) and 3) Junctional epithelium (JE). The junctional epithelium may be regarded as the most interesting structure of the gingiva. The formation of junctional epithelium in the implant/ mucosal interface can be considered as the first barrier of defense against oral micro flora. Any kind of disruption of this barrier will lead to initiation and progression of progression of periodontal disease. Hence, in this review we made an attempt to wrap various concepts of junctional epithelium formation, its role in disease progression and its relation to the implant surface.
Keywords
Junctional epithelium
Barrier
Periodontal disease
implant surface
oral microflora
Introduction
Junctional epithelium (J.E) rather than simply providing an attachment to the tooth surface it actively participates in host defense mechanisms. Hence it is regarded as the most interesting structure of gingiva.[1] The key function of J.E is to clear and thwart the continuous bacterial challenge by allowing the cells and substances to emigrate from the sulcus into the gingival connective tissue considering it as an ‘open system’.[2] Amongst the gingival epithelium a spot light on J.E is important because of its location anatomically and as because it is the site of host-bacterial interaction in the initiation of periodontal disease.
Definitions
“A unique squamous non-keratinized epithelium that forms the base of the gingival sulcus and adheres to both tooth and the underlying lamina propria at the base of the gingival crevice formerly called as epithelial attachment” -AAP.[3]
“The Junctional epithelium is the epithelial component of the dento-gingival unit that is in contact with the tooth surface” - Bosshardt and Lang.[2]
Terminologies
Epithelial attachment - Gottelieb 1921
Epithelial cuff - Waerhaug 1952
Attached epithelial cuff - Orban 1956
Junctional epithelium - Stern 1967
Concepts of Junctional Epithelium
The history of the development, structure and dynamics of the epithelial attachment, has been reviewed and retold since many years.
G.V. Black (1915) suggested that as the tooth erupts into the oral cavity, the oral and odontogenic epithelium fuse to form a continuous lining. According to Black, at the CEJ the apical end of the sulcular epithelium was only attached.[4]
Microscopically the presence of a firm attachment around the tooth was first demonstrated by Gottelieb (1921) which he termed as “epithelial attachment”.[5]
Holton (1937) concluded that there was no real connection found to exist between enamel and epithelium with the introduction of dyes into the attachment.
Waerhaug (1952) observed that the epithelial cells attached to the surface of artificial crowns which were in contact with the pocket epithelium was due to adhesion and described this junction as the EPITHELIAL CUFF.[6]
Orban (1960) demonstrated a firm attachment of epithelial cells to the teeth in his experimental study where he inserted steel blades into the sulci of dogs and monkeys. This experiment was in agreement with the Gottelieb's concept of firm attachment.[7]
Listgarten (1966) felt that epithelial cells attach to the tooth by means of hemidesmosomes and a basement membrane (basal lamina) despite their origin, whether derived from reduced ameloblasts or oral epithelium.
Since cells move along the tooth surface from the apical portion of the epithelial attachment to the base of the sulcus this attachment is not considered static.[5]
Stern (1981) reported a width of lamina lucida is 400 A°.[6]
Sabag et al (1981) described that 4 to 8 hemidesmosomes at the coronal zone and 2 hemidesmosomes in the apical zone mediate the epithelial attachment to the cementum root surface concluding that more adhesion is exhibited by the coronal zone of cemental surface when compared to apical zone.[6]
The opinion that attachment to the tooth surface may occur even without the cuticle being present and the cuticle only represents an accumulation of material from metabolites of plaque, which was suggested by Friedman in 1993.[7]

The final conversion of reduced enamel epithelium to a stratified squamous epithelium may not occur until 3-4years after the tooth has erupted.[8]
The development of the dento-gingival junction may be regarded as complete, immediately after all the reduced enamel epithelium has been transformed into the squamous epithelium.
At this time, it extends to the cemento-enamel junction and its epithelial component consists of junctional epithelium, formed largely by transformation of reduced enamel epithelium. Interface between J.E and the tooth surface forms ? secondary epithelial attachment.[9]
Anatomy of the Junctional Epithelium
Junctional epithelium is stratified squamous non keratinizing epithelium which forms a collar like band peripheral to the cervical region of tooth. JE coronally terminates as a free surface which is located at the base of sulcus. Length of JE is 0.25 to 1.35 according to Carranza; and according to Gargiulo is 0.71 mm-1.35 mm.[10] The epithelial seal extends from CEJ to marginal gingiva under pristine conditions which is 2mm in height and is attached to the tooth surface (epithelial attachment) by the internal basal lamina and to the gingival connective tissue (basal layer) by an external basal lamina. (Figure 1)

Cellular inclusions of Junctional Epithelium
The basal cell layer and the adjacent 1 to 2 suprabasal cell layers are cuboidal to slightly spindle shaped and the remaining layers of suprabasal cell layers are flat, oriented parallel to the tooth surface, and closely resemble each other. (Figure 2)

The inner most suprabasal cells facing the tooth surface are also called as DAT cells (Directly Attached to Tooth) (Salonen et al., 1989).[12]
In general, the transformation of gingival sulcus to periodontal pocket is the result of disturbances or imbalance between microbial attack and host defence mechanisms. Locally, this process includes the degeneration and detachment of coronal DAT cells from the tooth surface. DAT cells forms and maintains the ‘internal basal lamina’ that faces the tooth surface and these cells may also share some additional characteristics with the basal cells since they have the ability to form an attachment.[13] Morphologically, DAT cells vary from low cuboidal to flatten cells. This variation in cell morphology did not correlate with the cells potential to synthesize DNA instead the prerequisite for DNA synthesis is the capability of attachment of individual suprabasal cells to the tooth surface.[14]
Along with the DAT Cells, lysosomal bodies, cytokeratins, polymorph nuclear lymphocytes are found in J.E cells.
Lysosomal bodies are found in more numbers in J.E cells. Enzymes contained within these lysosomes share a role in the eradication of bacteria.[15]
Cytokeratins belong to intermediate filament (IF) protein family that provides mechanical support and fulfil a variety of functions in epithelial cells.[16] Cytokeratin distribution varies in different epithelia; its distribution in oral epithelium is different from junctional epithelial complex which is adjacent to the tooth surface.
Various cytokeratins detected immune histochemically in J.E are CK 19, CK 16, CK 14, CK 13, CK 6, CK 5, and CK 4. According to the findings of Juhl et al CK13 is more frequently found in the coronal part of JE and is considered to be a differentiation marker for non-keratinized squamous epithelia.[17] A study was done by Feghali-Assaly et al to identify the above mentioned cytokeratins in partially erupted human dentition and concluded that the following cytokeratins are seen in PJE (Primary junctional epithelium)[18]
PJE In Basal layers - CK 19, 16, 13 and 4 mRNAs were abundant
In Supra basal layers - CK 19 less concentrated but CK 13 and 4 is abundant
Neutrophilic granulocytes are the immune defense cells of the J.E, also called as polymorphonuclear leukocytes, neutrophils and PMNs. They are abundantly found in the central region of the J.E (Schroeder and Listgarten 1997).[19] > 50% of the leukocytes infiltrating the J.E and 90% of the leukocytes isolated from the crevicular fluid are neutrophils. The periodontal tissues neutrophilic con centration exceeds the blood neutrophil concentration.[20] (Table 1)
| TISSUE | COUNT OF NEUTROPHILS |
|---|---|
| Connective tissue of minimally infiltrated gingiva | 2.5 × 107 PMN/cm3 |
| Junctional epithelium of minimally inflamed gingiva | 1.7 × 108 PMN/cm3 |
| Blood levels of neutrophils range | 1 × 106 to 4 × 106 PMN /cm3 |
The epithelial attachment: The basement membrane is made up of external and internal basal lamina. The external basal lamina lies between internal basal lamina and basal cells of J.E. The internal basal lamina is found to be continuous with the external basal lamina at the apical end of junctional epithelium.[21] By means of internal basal lamina together with the hemidesmosomes the junctional epithelium is attached to the tooth surface. This is called epithelial attachment (Figure 3 and 4).


Basement membrane operate special functions like
Compartmentalization (physical barrier function),
Filtration (selective permeability barrier function),
Cell polarization,
Migration,
Adhesion, and
Differentiation[22]
Internal basal lamina consists of;
Lamina lucida also called as Lamina rara
Lamina densa
Lamina Fibroreticularis also called as Sub-basal lamina.
Sub basal lamina faces the connective tissue and forms a layer of reticular and anchoring fibrils. Generally, basement membrane matrix typically constitutes type IV and type VII collagen, laminin, heparan sulfate, proteoglycan, fibronectin, nidogen (entactin), and the proteoglycan perlecan, while the basement membrane of J.E lacks most of these constituents like as collagen types IV and VII, most laminin isoforms, perlecan.[23] Thus, the internal basal lamina of J.E cannot be regarded as basement membrane as it has its own characteristics.
Intercellular Junctions
There are various cell junctions in epithelial tissues and play a key role in enabling communication between neighbouring cells via specialized proteins called communicating junctions.
Generally, there are three major types of cell junctions:
Anchoring junctions
Gap junctions (communicating junction)
Tight junctions (occluding junctions)[24]
Three types of anchoring junctions are noticed; they are desomosomal junctions, hemidesmosomal junctions and adherens junctions and they differ from one another in their cytoskeleton anchor and the Trans membrane linker.[25] (Table 2)
| Junction | Desmosomes | Hemides-mosomes | Adherens junctions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytoskeleton | Intermediate | Intermediate | Actin |
| anchor | filaments | filaments | filaments |
| Transmembrane | Cadherin | Integrins | Cadherin / |
| linker | Integrins | ||
| Ties cell to | Other cells | EC matrix | Other cells / EC matrix |
| HEALTHY TEETH | HEALTHY IMPLANTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sulcuar depth | Shallow in absence of disease | Sulcular depth varies, depending upon the length of abutment and restorative margin. |
| J.E | On the enamel surface | On the metal surface of the implant |
| Biologic width | Supracrestal | Subcrestal |
| Gingival fibres | Fibres inserted on to the | Collagen fibres are arranged in parallel fashion |
| cementum above the crest of the bone and arranged in a complex manner | ||
| Crest of the bone | 1-2 mm apical to CEJ | Crest of the bone varies - According to the design of the implant - If the implant surface is threaded then the crest of the bone lies about the first thread |
| Physical characteristics | Slight mobility is present and normal because of the visoelastic properties of periodontal ligament | No mobility present and resembles ankylosed unless infected |
| Adaptive characteristics | Adaptive capacity varies according to the amount of occlusal forces | No adaptive capacity present due to the abscence of periodontal ligament. |
| Proprioception | Good proprioception because of presence of high sensitive receptors | No proprioception. |
Gap junctions are also called as nexus or macula communicans and are specialized intercellular connections which directly connect the cytoplasm of two cells. These gap junctions allow various molecules, ions and electrical impulses to directly pass through a regulated gate between the cells.[26]
Tight junctions also known as occluding junctions or zonulae occludentes (Singular, Zona occludens) are composed of a branching network of sealing strands. Therefore, the efficiency of the junction in preventing ion passage increases exponentially with the number of strands.[27]
J.E cells are interconnected by few desmosomes and occasional gap junctions contrary to stratified squamous gingival epithelium whose cells are connected by all the three types of junctions.
Innervations
The junctional epithelium is well innervated by sensory nerve fibers especially the basal cell layers, which have been subsequently been confirmed by immunocytochemical studies.[28,29] These studies observed that several dense nerve plexus are distributed and detected in the apical two-thirds of the epithelium, near the gingival sulcus and the enamel surface. Tanaka and coworkers they employed substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and neurokinin-1 receptor and demonstrated the existence of nerve terminals. In the intercellular spaces between basal cells of junctional epithelium substance P- axon profiles were detected immune histochemically.[30]
Dynamics of the Junctional Epithelium
Knowledge about progressive alteration of cellular and extracellular aspects of J.E is important as these dynamics are crucial in maintaining its protective and regenerative functions.[31] The characteristic feature of J.E in primates is its high cellular turn over which is about 1 week to 10 days.[32] Turn over happens by mitotic cell division which is seen at the basal cell layers and DAT cells and the subsequent migration of cells towards the coronal direction resulting in gradual exfoliation of daughter cells from the free surface of J.E. Also, Since the DAT cells are connected to the basal lamina the DAT cells are said to migrate towards the bottom of the sulcus. Thus, the epithelial attachment is dynamic not static.[33]
Role of JE in Antimicrobial Defence
A variety of molecules are transported by the tissue fluid to the bottom of gingival sulcus through the J.E. These molecules along with PMNs they represent host immune defense mechanism against the bacterial insults. Approximately 30,000 PMNs per minute migrate into the oral cavity through the J.E in the absence of clinical signs of inflammation. Thus, gingival fluid is considered as an exudate and its flow rate is directly proportional to the degree of inflammation.
Various mechanisms involved in antimicrobial defense:
High turnover rate of J.E is crucial in antimicrobial defense
The surface area of J.E is 50 times larger and hence allows for effective flow of epithelial cells and impedes bacterial colonization and thus acts as an effective barrier. This is called as Funnelling effect.
Defensins and lysosomal enzymes produced by the cells of J.E which functions as antimicrobial defense
Chemokines which are secreted by activated epithelial cells attracts various cells like defensins and lymphocytes which activate further inflammatory process.
Role of the Junctional Epithelium in the initiation of Pocket Formation
Pocket formation initiates by detachment of DAT cells from tooth surface. A biologically relevant and clinically important question raised by Schroeder (1996) is: ‘what happens to the junctional epithelium under conditions of sub-gingival microbial attack, i.e., in context with pocket formation and deepening?’ This question still awaits resolution but meanwhile several researchers have attributed the formation of pocket to a loss of cellular continuity in the coronal-most portion of the J.E.[34]
Clinically, factors of both microbial and host origin alter the JE in several ways like the attachment apparatus between the JE and the teeth can be broken down (or) the biosynthetic function of the DAT cells can be altered (or) cell lysis can be induced (or) renewal of the DAT cells can be inhibited.[35]
Takata and Donath (1988)[36] studying pocket formation in humans, observed degenerative changes in the second or third cell layer of the DAT cells in the coronal-most portion of the junctional epithelium facing the bacterial biofilm. Similar observations were made in a dog model.[37] Several attempts to explain the reason for the cleavage within the junctional epithelium have been made. With increasing degrees of gingival inflammation, both the emigration of PMNs and the rate of gingival crevicular fluid passing through the intercellular spaces of the junctional epithelium increase.[38] Moderately distended intercellular spaces are not considered to interfere with the structural and functional integrity of the junctional epithelium. However, an increased number of mononuclear leukocytes, i.e., T- and B-lymphocytes and monocytes/ macrophages, together with PMNs, are considered as factors that contribute to the focal disintegration of the junctional epithelium.[39] Apart from the view that the host itself is the major source of factors contributing to the disintegration of the junctional epithelium, other possibilities have to be considered as well.
Various factors of both microbial and host origin which can clinically alter J.E, they are:
The attachment apparatus between the JE and the teeth can be broken down
DAT cells biosynthetic function can be altered
Stimulation of DAT cell lysis
DAT cell lysis renewal inhibited
All these mechanisms ultimately lead to degenerative changes in JE which further promote detachment of epithelium from the root surface and subsequently lead to periodontal pocket formation. But, this is not thoroughly being studied and the development of optimal model systems is still in progress. Thus, the development of pocket is attributed to detachment of the DAT cells or to the development of an intra-epithelial split.
Junctional Epithelium and Microbiota
The Junctional epithelium allows various cells and molecules to migrate into the sulcus from gingival connective tissue which helps in fighting against continuous bacterial invasion, and in contrast bacterial cells are also permeable to enter into J.E hence it is considered as “Open system”. It has already been studied that the pocket formation results due to subgingival spread of microbiota under impaired defense conditions.[40] So, various authors have further extended their studies[41,42,43] to know about various mechanisms exercised by microbiota in the destruction of J.E. However, amongst all microbiota, a keen interest is paid to know the m e c h a n i s m s p l a y e d b y A c t i n o b a c i l l u s actinomycetemcomitans (A.A comitans) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) to adhere, replicate and invade epithelial cells.
Cysteine proteinases produced by P.gingivalis commonly regarded as Gingipains[44], specially degrade cell-cell epithelial junctional complexes leading to proteolysis of focal contact components, adhesion signaling molecules, adherens junction proteins, reduced adhesion to extracellular matrices, changes in morphology, impaired motility, and apoptosis.
Various studies have also reported that Gingipains disrupts the ICAM-1-dependent adhesion of PMNs to oral epithelial cells allowing P.gingivalis to enter J.E leading to proteolytic disruption of the epithelial integrity, a significant factor in pocket formation initiation.

Junctional Epithelium adjacent to Oral Implants
Hence, it is the subject of interest whether or not these 2 J.E is identical in their structural and functional characteristics. However, although the 2 epithelia resemble similar structurally[45,46,47], few dissimilarities have been reported[48,49,50] (Figure 6)
FEW KEY SIMILARITLES BETWEEN IMPLANT-EPITHELIUM JUNCTIONE & JUNCTIONAL EPITHELIUM
-
➤
Epithelial cells in Loth the epithelia are attached to the tοοth by hcmidesmosomes.
-
➤
A viable biplogic scal exists between both epithelia
-
➤
Sulcus around, the implant is also lined by sulcular epithelium which is- contiuous with J Ε
-
➤
Capillary loops under both the epithelia appear to be similar
-
➤
Certain marker molecules of defence mechanism against bacterial challenge like t- PA ICAM-1. cytokeratin profile etc., appear similar to that of gingival J.E
Histochemical Aspects of normal Junctional Epithelium[51,52]
Histochemical techniques are considered important as they provide knowledge regarding various enzyme systems and chemical components that appear in normal gingiva which help us in appreciating physiologic processes in the gingiva and the changes that occur in disease. Following are various cellular and intercellular substances and enzymes that can be appreciated in the normal gingiva.
Cellular and intercellular substances
Heteropolysaccharide which stains PAS +ve is an intercellular ground substance seen between the cells of the epithelium.
Acid mucopolysaccharides, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate A, C and B etc., PAS -ve are present between the epithelial cells, and are considered by some investigators to be intercellular cementing substance and by others to be certain stained portions of intercellular attachment apparatus.
PAS +ve glycogen is present in the epithelium in concentrations inversely related to the amount of keratinisation.
Normally sulfhydryls and disulfides bonds are present in the gingival epithelium.
The DNA and RNA activity of the epithelium at the gingival margin and junctional epithelium is greater than in the remaining oral mucosa.
Enzymes
Various enzymes found to be present in the J.E are:
Collagenase
Alkaline phosphatase
Lysosomes
Diphospho and triphosphopyridine nucleotide reductase
Cytochromic oxidase
Regeneration of the junctional epithelium
Because of its anatomical location, injury of J.E may occur through various mechanical methods or clinical probing or through some intentional trauma.
-
Clinical Probing:
Clinical probing disrupts J.E cells mechanically from the tooth surface. Several studies focused on whether and how fast a new epithelial attachment can be reformed. An experimental study done in marmosets was shown that 5 days after complete separation of J.E following clinical probing, a new epithelial attachment was established.
In another study it was shown that epithelial seal around implants was re-established within about the same time period following clinical probing.[53] Based on the findings of these 2 studies, clinical probing around implants and natural teeth does not lead to irreversible damage of the soft tissue components.
∅ Oral Hygiene Practices:
Regular oral hygiene practices may cause unintentional trauma to J.E. Waerhaug (1981) reported that following the use of dental floss in 12-year-old humans at premolar regions and after cessation of flossing there is detachment of cells which persisted for 24 hours and then new epithelial reattachment started within 3 days.[54]
-
Gingivectomy:
Oral hygiene never completely removes J.E from tooth surface. However, the application of gingivectomy techniques would completely remove J.E. Subsequently, the formation of a new J.E must occur from basal cells of the oral gingival epithelium.
In humans, a new J.E after gingivectomy may form within 20 days indicating that it is a highly dynamic tissue with a fast self-renewal capacity.[55]
Scaling And Root Planing
JE forms in 2 weeks after phase I therapy.[56]
Open Flap Debridement
Formation of long J.E occurs in 4-6 months.[57]
-
Mucogingival Surgery
It takes 3-4 weeks and the stages involved are: - adaptation, proliferation, attachment and maturation.[58]
Conclusion
Junctional epithelium is a unique tissue that fulfils a challenging function at the border between the oral cavity, colonized by bacteria, and the tooth attachment apparatus. It is structurally and functionally very well-adapted to control the constant bacterial ingress. Its structural alteration is clearly the first step towards the progression of disease. The conversion of the J.E to pocket epithelium is regarded as a hallmark in the development of periodontitis. Thus, understanding the molecular architecture and function of the junctional epithelium attachment may aid in the understanding the onset and progression of periodontal disease and may provide new possibilities for manipulating periodontal healing.
References
- Patterns of phenotypic expression of human junctional, gingival and reduced enamel epithelia in vivo and in vitroDental Branch/Dental Science Institute, University of Texas, Houston 77335. Epithelial Cell Biology. [1992];1((4)):156-167.
- [Google Scholar]
- Periodontal literature review. Definition of junctional epithelium
- The border zone tooth-enamel and epithelium after periodontal treatment. An experimental electron microscopic study in the cat. ActaOdontol Scand. 1970;28((1)):147-55.
- [Google Scholar]
- The Junctional Epithelium: From Strength to Defense. J Dent Res. 2003;82((3)):158-161.
- [Google Scholar]
- Current Concepts of the Dentogingival Junction: The Epithelial and Connective Tissue Attachments to the Tooth. J. Periodontol. 1981;52((9))
- [Google Scholar]
- Periodontal literature reviews In: Periodontal diseases Vol Volume. 1996. (First edition). 1996. p. :12-35. Chapter 2
- [Google Scholar]
- Changes in cell phenotype during regeneration of junctional epithelium of human gingiva in vitro. J Periodontal Res. 1989;24:370-377.
- [Google Scholar]
- Textbook of dental and oral histology with embryology; Satish Chandra shaleen Chandra 2004, Page 200
- Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol. 1961;32:261-267.
- [Google Scholar]
- Clinical diagnosis & guidelines. International Dental Journal of Student's Research. 2015;3((2)):52.
- [Google Scholar]
- Changes in cell phenotype during regeneration of junctional epithelium of human gingiva in vitro. J Periodontal Res. 1989;24:370-377.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cytoskeleton and surface structures of cells directly attached to the tooth in the rat junctional epithelium. J Periodont Res. 2005;40:354-363.
- [Google Scholar]
- Characterization of the Human Junctional Epithelial Cells Directly Attached to the Tooth (DAT Cells)in Periodontal Disease. J Dent Res. 1994;73((12)):1818-1823.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cytochemistry and ultrastructure of gingival sulcus cells. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971;15((Suppl 15)):65-86.
- [Google Scholar]
- Immunohistochemical distribution of keratin proteins in clinically healthy human gingival epithelia. Scand J Dent Res. 1989;97:159-170.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cytokeratin profile of the junctional epithelium in partially erupted teeth. J Periodontal Res. 1994;29((3)):185-95.
- [Google Scholar]
- Presence of leukocytes in crevices of healthy and chronically inflamed gingivae. J Periodontal Res. 1970;5:42-47.
- [Google Scholar]
- Neutrophils in health and disease: An overview. Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology. 2006;10(1):38.
- [Google Scholar]
- The dento-epithelial junction: cell adhesion by type I hemidesmosomes in the absence of a true basal lamina. J Periodontol. 2001;72:788-797.
- [Google Scholar]
- Ultracytochemical localization of basal lamina anionic sites in the rat epithelial attachment apparatus. J Periodontal Res. 1992;27:256-263.
- [Google Scholar]
- Electron-immunocytochemistry of laminin and type-IV collagen in the junctional epithelium of rat molar gingiva. J PeriodontalRes. 1990;25:372-376.
- [Google Scholar]
- A Guide. New York: Springer; p. :574. p. ISBN 2009; 978-1-934115-46-6
- “Cross-talk between tight and anchoring junctions-lesson from the testis”. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.. 2008;636:234-5.
- [Google Scholar]
- “Genetic diseases and gene knockouts reveal diverse connexin functions”. Annual Review of Physiology. 1999;61((1)):283-310.
- [Google Scholar]
- “An interpretation of liver cell membrane and junction structure based on observation of freeze-fracture replicas of both sides of the fracture”. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1970;47((1)):49-60.
- [Google Scholar]
- Immunohistochemical study of nerve fibres with substance P- or calcitonin gene-related peptide-like immunoreactivity in the junctional epithelium of developing rats. Arch. Oral Biol.. 1992;37:655-662.
- [Google Scholar]
- An immunohistochemical and monastral blue-vascular labelling studyon the involvement of capsaicin-sensitive sensory innervation of the junctional epithelium in neurogenic plasma extravasation in the rat gingiva. Arch. Oral Biol. 1995;40:931-940.
- [Google Scholar]
- Immunocytochemical study of nerve fibers containing substance P inthe junctional epithelium of rats. J. Periodont. Res.. 1996;31:187-194.
- [Google Scholar]
- Turnover of the gingival epithelium in marmosets. Acta Odontol Scand. 1965;23:623-643.
- [Google Scholar]
- Fine structure of developing epithelial attachment of human teeth In: Wolsky A, ed. Monographs in developmental biology. Vol Vol. 2. Basel: Karger; 1971. p. :1-134. In: editor pp.
- [Google Scholar]
- The origin and variation in number of leukocytes in the human saliva. J Periodontal Res. 1970;5:36-41.
- [Google Scholar]
- Host mediators in gingival crevicular fluid: implications for the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1992;3((1-2)):31-60.
- [Google Scholar]
- Die Entstehung plaquebedingter Gingivataschen im Tiermodell. Eine histologische Studie an unentkalkten Dünnschliffen. Dtsch Zahnärztl.. 1990;45:264-266.
- [Google Scholar]
- The mechanism of pocket formation. A light microscopic study on undecalcified human material. J Periodontol. 1988;59:215-221.
- [Google Scholar]
- Sulcular polymorphonuclear leucocytes and gingival exudate during experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontal Res.. 1980;15:151-158.
- [Google Scholar]
- Pocket formation: a hypothesis In: Lehner T, Cimasoni G, eds. The borderland between caries and periodontal disease II. London, New York: Academic Press/Grune & Stratton; 1980. p. :99-123. In: editors pp.
- [Google Scholar]
- The gingival tissues: The architecture for periodontal protection. Periodontol. 19972000;13:91-120.
- [Google Scholar]
- Interaction of Porphyromonas gingivalis with gingival epithelial cells maintained in culture. Oral Microbiol Immuno.. 1992;7:364.
- [Google Scholar]
- Porphyromonas gingivalis invasion of gingival epithelial cells. Infect Immun.. 1995;63:3878-3885.
- [Google Scholar]
- Porphyromonas gingivalis invades human pocket epithelium in vitro. J Periodontal Res. 1994;29:62-69.
- [Google Scholar]
- Role of bacterial proteinases in matrix destruction and modulation of host responses. Periodontol 2024:153-192.
- [Google Scholar]
- Cysteine proteases of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2001;12:192-216.
- [Google Scholar]
- The scientific basis for and clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI Dental Implant System: a consensus report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11((Suppl 1)):33-58.
- [Google Scholar]
- Immunolocalization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the periimplant epithelium. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1997;38:187-193.
- [Google Scholar]
- Ultrastructural and immunoelectron microscopic studies of the periimplant epithelium-implant (Ti-6Al-4V) interface of rat maxilla. J Periodontol. 2000;71:961-973.
- [Google Scholar]
- An experimental study on the features of peri-implant epithelium: immunohistochemical and electron microscopic observations. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2003;44:185-199.
- [Google Scholar]
- Implants and clinical dentistry;Field of Periodontology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Studies. Tokyo Medical and Dental University;
- Plasminogen activator in human gingival tissue adjacent to dental implants. Clin Oral Implants. 1992;3((2)):85-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Localization of some enzymes in the periodontium of the rat molar. Acta Histochem. 1980;67((2)):173-9.
- [Google Scholar]
- Radioautographic visualization of collagen metabolism in the periodontal tissue of the mouse. Arch. oral Biol.. 1965;10:833-848.
- [Google Scholar]
- Healing after standardized clinical probing of the periimplant soft tissue seal: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:571-580.
- [Google Scholar]
- Healing of the dento-epithelial junction following the use of dental floss. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 1981;8:144-150.
- [Google Scholar]
- An electron microscopic study of the regeneration of gingival epithelium following gingivectomy in the dog. J Periodontal Res. 1970;5:196-204.
- [Google Scholar]
- Healing of the dento-epithelial junction following subgingival plaque control. II: As observed on extracted teeth. J Periodontol. 1978;49((3)):119-34.
- [Google Scholar]
- Healing responses of human intraosseous lesion following the use of debridement, grafting and citric acid root treatment.Clinical and histologic observations 6 months post-surgery. J periodontol. 1983;54:67-76.
- [Google Scholar]
- Histogenesis of repair following osseous surgery. Journal of Periodontology. 1970;41((10)):551-565.
- [Google Scholar]
